Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Newer Light Duty Trucks > 2015 F150
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


2015 F150 Discuss the 2015 Ford F150 SPONSORED BY:

Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
View Poll Results: Which 2015 F150 engine would you pick?
Naturally aspirated 3.5L V6 2 1.46%
5.0L V8 62 45.26%
2.7L EcoBoost V6 25 18.25%
3.5L EcoBoost V6 48 35.04%
Voters: 137. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 08-01-2014, 10:52 AM
Patrick R. Patrick R. is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 7
Patrick R. is starting off with a positive reputation.
Question of the Week: Which 2015 Ford F150 Engine Would You Pick?

If you were ordering a 2015 Ford F150 today, which of the four engine options would you pick...and why? Select your ideal engine in the poll above and tell us why you would go that route in the comments below!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-01-2014, 11:20 AM
paredneck33 paredneck33 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: penn twp.
Posts: 1,512
paredneck33 has a good reputation on FTE.paredneck33 has a good reputation on FTE.paredneck33 has a good reputation on FTE.
For me to soon to know. I need to know more about the revisions to both the 3.5 ecoboost and the 5.0 first. Not to mention the fuel ratings for each of the four engines. Not that, that is as important to me as it is to some. But for the record it's not that I,m rich, cause I'm far from it. But it's just that I don't have false hopes nor do I expect that a 5-6000lbs truck with around 400hp will get the same fuel eco. while towing 11000lbs. that a damn Prius gets while empty.
__________________
Alex just another Fordaholic here!!!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-01-2014, 12:45 PM
seventyseven250's Avatar
seventyseven250 seventyseven250 is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 3,036
seventyseven250 is a name known to allseventyseven250 is a name known to allseventyseven250 is a name known to allseventyseven250 is a name known to allseventyseven250 is a name known to allseventyseven250 is a name known to all
I love my current 3.5 EcoBoost so much, I can't imagine buying anything else.
__________________
2012 F150 SuperCrew EcoBoost 4x4 XLT/XTR 145" WB 3.31 Axle

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jklnhyd View Post
Holy hell, its not even 9am and you folks are gonna drive me to drink....
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-01-2014, 03:47 PM
GuyGene's Avatar
GuyGene GuyGene is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Clay Country, GA, NE MS
Posts: 409
GuyGene is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I picked the last V8 in the F150. Just because.
__________________
That old man, he don't think like no old man.
"He's pinned under an outcropping of rock. Lucky for him, the rock kept the dirt from burying him alive". Dirt, it's nothing but dirt, I tell ye...
"I thought I was wrong one time, but I was mistaken." Command Sergeant Major Jim

'02 Supercrew, 5.4 Two WD
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-01-2014, 04:12 PM
crblersr crblersr is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 3
crblersr is starting off with a positive reputation.
I learned to drive in a early 70's F-250, hauling hay. My brother had a '78 F-150 with a 4 speed (manual) 400. That is what I want. I own a'77 with a 351m/400 4 speed 4wd. sad to know we can only get a 5.0.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-01-2014, 04:22 PM
seventyseven250's Avatar
seventyseven250 seventyseven250 is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 3,036
seventyseven250 is a name known to allseventyseven250 is a name known to allseventyseven250 is a name known to allseventyseven250 is a name known to allseventyseven250 is a name known to allseventyseven250 is a name known to all
I learned to drive on an 1972 F250 with the 390, and I've owned 1977 F250's with the 460 and 400 engines.

I'd still take the 3.5 EcoBoost.
__________________
2012 F150 SuperCrew EcoBoost 4x4 XLT/XTR 145" WB 3.31 Axle

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jklnhyd View Post
Holy hell, its not even 9am and you folks are gonna drive me to drink....
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-01-2014, 06:15 PM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins tseekins is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hampton, Virginia
Posts: 19,287
tseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputation
I chose the 3.5L Ecoboost mainly because I have one and I can testify that they aren't as problematic as the internet may allude to.

I think the 2.7L will be a great choice but the 3.5L is great on gas when properly geared and delivers an abundance of stupid raw power that just makes a grown man get all smiley.
__________________
Tim
SCPO United States Coast Guard Retired
2011 F-150 XLT 4x4 Ecoboost
2010 Ford Focus
2004 Expedition XLT 4x2

FTE Guidelines
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-01-2014, 09:18 PM
crblersr crblersr is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 3
crblersr is starting off with a positive reputation.
I have not had the honor of driving an ecoBoost vehicle. My boss has a 2014 platinum-150 and says he gets 11 mpg. My wifes 1966 F-100 has a 460 and is wildly impressive to drive. It also gets about 11 mpg. Call me on it if ya want to, but old school Ford power is badass.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-01-2014, 10:28 PM
Frdtrkrul Frdtrkrul is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Prior Lake, MN
Posts: 331
Frdtrkrul is starting off with a positive reputation.
McSniperliger
It's a toss up for me between the EcoBoost engines and the Coyote. I don't do much towing right now, and its normally a 17' 1974 Starcraft with a 70hp Evinrude and a custom made ice fishhouse/camper. However the boat sits dormant for the last few years and the fish house doesn't move until Rifle Deer season in November and whenever our lakes have enough ice to hold the thing without breaking under the weight.

At work I have driven both the EcoBoost and the 5.0L. I like the diesel torque feeling of the 3.5L and with my style of driving I would be in the peak torque range. But I have not been able to test out for obvious reasons the 2.7L EB to give my 2 cents about it. Seeing the video of it in the Baja 1000 race, I am impressed...however with the CAC issues I would probably put my money on the 5.0L if I had the dough to buy a 2015 F150.

My current F150 at the best mpg was 19.2...from Kearney, NE to Prior Lake, MN without the interstate while driving around 55-62mph. Ideally if they offer the EcoBoost in 3.73 (not sure if they do never looked into it), I'd probably jump on it.

The 5.0L being somewhat familiar with it, I like how the coil packs are easy to get to and you don't have to dig under plastic covers to get to them...they are right there in your face where they belong! In the bit that I have driven turbocharged engines, I am impressed by them. But I like the simplicity of the N/A engines. So I guess it would depend on my mood, what kind of deals I can get, mileage and how easy to dang thing is to work on without a car lift.
__________________
-History is written by the victor, history is filled with liars.
-1999 F150 5.4L V8 auto XLT Ext. Cab long bed 245K
-Ford Today, Ford Tomorrow, Ford FOREVER!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-02-2014, 12:50 AM
CuNmUdF250's Avatar
CuNmUdF250 CuNmUdF250 is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 769
CuNmUdF250 has a good reputation on FTE.CuNmUdF250 has a good reputation on FTE.
for me towing is not an issue.....the 5.0 is perfect...power and decent mpg
__________________
e99 F250 XLT 4x4 V10...13 F150 XLT 4x4 5.0
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-02-2014, 06:43 AM
Tom's Avatar
Tom Tom is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Union, CT
Posts: 14,642
Tom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputation
TomB985
I'd have to see the fuel economy numbers, but if the 2.7L is as big of an improvement as I think it will that would be my choice. I don't have my big trailer anymore, so unless I needed to tow something heavy the little V6 would probably do a fine job for me.

It has 11% less torque and 12% less horsepower than the bigger 3.5L EcoBoost, and it happens to be around 10% lighter than the current trucks. Meaning the 2.7L engine should feel roughly equal in the 2015 to a current-gen 3.5L truck when empty.

I think lots of folks are discounting the 2.7L engine simply because of its size. I believe that to be as big of a mistake as those who did the same a few years ago to the 3.5L EcoBoost.
__________________
Tom,

Currently truckless.
Most recently: 2013 F150 XLT 4x4 EcoBoost
Moderators, Guidelines, and How They are Enforced
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-02-2014, 11:18 AM
03 SVT VERT 03 SVT VERT is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 414
03 SVT VERT has a good reputation on FTE.03 SVT VERT has a good reputation on FTE.03 SVT VERT has a good reputation on FTE.
I'd get the 3.2L Powerstroke.

Really though, I'm torn between the 5.0 and the 3.5L ecoboost. My fun side wants to get a regular cab/short bed 5.0 and then add a blower. My more practical side says crew cab ecoboost.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-02-2014, 11:41 AM
DIYiT's Avatar
DIYiT DIYiT is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,202
DIYiT has a good reputation on FTE.DIYiT has a good reputation on FTE.
I'd go with the 2.7 Ecoboost. I've got the 3.5 in my truck now with 3.55, and for how little I've actually used the power and gearing, vs the long interstate drives unloaded, I'd be fine going with the 3.31 gears, 2.7 Ecoboost and take advantage of the better fuel economy. That said, I've still got my '95 to play with when I need to tow, the V8 noise, or more power.
__________________
2013 F150 FX4, Ecoboost, 3.55 SCrew 5.5

1995 F-250 - Vortech 460, E40D - 4x4 3.55, Single Cab, Long Box
DIYiT's F-250 Build Thread
--Dana 60 Swap --Vortech Install
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-02-2014, 10:59 PM
Papa Tiger's Avatar
Papa Tiger Papa Tiger is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,005
Papa Tiger has a good reputation on FTE.Papa Tiger has a good reputation on FTE.
Going with the 2nd generation EB motor for sure !
__________________
Women might not find ya handsome but they will find ya in your F150.
Ford Built_Ford Tough
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-02-2014, 11:44 PM
j.grif's Avatar
j.grif j.grif is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: plymouth mi
Posts: 314
j.grif is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.j.grif is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I have a 3.5 twin turbo right now and love the engine, I have a max tow and need/want the torque and horsepower for towing my travel trailer.
__________________
2012 fx4 supercab max tow
Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2014, 11:44 PM
 
 
 
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Newer Light Duty Trucks > 2015 F150

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question of the Week: Should Ford have kept the 6.2L V8 for the 2015 F150? Patrick R. 2015 F150 33 09-15-2014 06:32 PM
Question of the Week: New Raptor or New Lightning? Patrick R. 2015 F150 5 09-14-2014 12:51 PM
2015 F350 DRW 6.7 Diesel Towing lb27312 Super Duty & Heavy Duty 5 08-25-2014 10:06 AM
2015 Platinum? or King Ranch? and why. mikethomas 6.7L Power Stroke Diesel 75 04-06-2014 08:17 AM
will ford make an suv based on the 2015 f150? elemint 2015 F150 27 03-07-2014 06:39 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup