2015 - 2020 F150 Discuss the 2015 - 2020 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Halo Lifts
View Poll Results: Which 2015 F150 engine would you pick?
Naturally aspirated 3.5L V6
6
2.02%
5.0L V8
135
45.45%
2.7L EcoBoost V6
43
14.48%
3.5L EcoBoost V6
113
38.05%
Voters: 297. You may not vote on this poll

Question of the Week: Which 2015 Ford F150 Engine Would You Pick?

  #1  
Old 08-01-2014, 10:52 AM
Patrick R.'s Avatar
Patrick R.
Patrick R. is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question of the Week: Which 2015 Ford F150 Engine Would You Pick?

If you were ordering a 2015 Ford F150 today, which of the four engine options would you pick...and why? Select your ideal engine in the poll above and tell us why you would go that route in the comments below!
 
  #2  
Old 08-01-2014, 11:20 AM
paredneck33's Avatar
paredneck33
paredneck33 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: penn twp.
Posts: 3,485
Received 49 Likes on 41 Posts
For me to soon to know. I need to know more about the revisions to both the 3.5 ecoboost and the 5.0 first. Not to mention the fuel ratings for each of the four engines. Not that, that is as important to me as it is to some. But for the record it's not that I,m rich, cause I'm far from it. But it's just that I don't have false hopes nor do I expect that a 5-6000lbs truck with around 400hp will get the same fuel eco. while towing 11000lbs. that a damn Prius gets while empty.
 
  #3  
Old 08-01-2014, 12:45 PM
seventyseven250's Avatar
seventyseven250
seventyseven250 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 8,058
Received 434 Likes on 319 Posts
I love my current 3.5 EcoBoost so much, I can't imagine buying anything else.
 
  #4  
Old 08-01-2014, 03:47 PM
GuyGene's Avatar
GuyGene
GuyGene is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Clay Country, GA, NE MS
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I picked the last V8 in the F150. Just because.
 
  #5  
Old 08-01-2014, 04:12 PM
crblersr's Avatar
crblersr
crblersr is offline
New User
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I learned to drive in a early 70's F-250, hauling hay. My brother had a '78 F-150 with a 4 speed (manual) 400. That is what I want. I own a'77 with a 351m/400 4 speed 4wd. sad to know we can only get a 5.0.
 
  #6  
Old 08-01-2014, 04:22 PM
seventyseven250's Avatar
seventyseven250
seventyseven250 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 8,058
Received 434 Likes on 319 Posts
I learned to drive on an 1972 F250 with the 390, and I've owned 1977 F250's with the 460 and 400 engines.

I'd still take the 3.5 EcoBoost.
 
  #7  
Old 08-01-2014, 06:15 PM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
tseekins is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 38,115
Received 1,217 Likes on 800 Posts
I chose the 3.5L Ecoboost mainly because I have one and I can testify that they aren't as problematic as the internet may allude to.

I think the 2.7L will be a great choice but the 3.5L is great on gas when properly geared and delivers an abundance of stupid raw power that just makes a grown man get all smiley.
 
  #8  
Old 08-01-2014, 09:18 PM
crblersr's Avatar
crblersr
crblersr is offline
New User
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have not had the honor of driving an ecoBoost vehicle. My boss has a 2014 platinum-150 and says he gets 11 mpg. My wifes 1966 F-100 has a 460 and is wildly impressive to drive. It also gets about 11 mpg. Call me on it if ya want to, but old school Ford power is badass.
 
  #9  
Old 08-01-2014, 10:28 PM
Frdtrkrul's Avatar
Frdtrkrul
Frdtrkrul is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Utica, Nebraska
Posts: 1,244
Received 29 Likes on 20 Posts
It's a toss up for me between the EcoBoost engines and the Coyote. I don't do much towing right now, and its normally a 17' 1974 Starcraft with a 70hp Evinrude and a custom made ice fishhouse/camper. However the boat sits dormant for the last few years and the fish house doesn't move until Rifle Deer season in November and whenever our lakes have enough ice to hold the thing without breaking under the weight.

At work I have driven both the EcoBoost and the 5.0L. I like the diesel torque feeling of the 3.5L and with my style of driving I would be in the peak torque range. But I have not been able to test out for obvious reasons the 2.7L EB to give my 2 cents about it. Seeing the video of it in the Baja 1000 race, I am impressed...however with the CAC issues I would probably put my money on the 5.0L if I had the dough to buy a 2015 F150.

My current F150 at the best mpg was 19.2...from Kearney, NE to Prior Lake, MN without the interstate while driving around 55-62mph. Ideally if they offer the EcoBoost in 3.73 (not sure if they do never looked into it), I'd probably jump on it.

The 5.0L being somewhat familiar with it, I like how the coil packs are easy to get to and you don't have to dig under plastic covers to get to them...they are right there in your face where they belong! In the bit that I have driven turbocharged engines, I am impressed by them. But I like the simplicity of the N/A engines. So I guess it would depend on my mood, what kind of deals I can get, mileage and how easy to dang thing is to work on without a car lift.
 
  #10  
Old 08-02-2014, 12:50 AM
CuNmUdF250's Avatar
CuNmUdF250
CuNmUdF250 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,043
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
for me towing is not an issue.....the 5.0 is perfect...power and decent mpg
 
  #11  
Old 08-02-2014, 06:43 AM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 25,416
Received 664 Likes on 435 Posts
I'd have to see the fuel economy numbers, but if the 2.7L is as big of an improvement as I think it will that would be my choice. I don't have my big trailer anymore, so unless I needed to tow something heavy the little V6 would probably do a fine job for me.

It has 11% less torque and 12% less horsepower than the bigger 3.5L EcoBoost, and it happens to be around 10% lighter than the current trucks. Meaning the 2.7L engine should feel roughly equal in the 2015 to a current-gen 3.5L truck when empty.

I think lots of folks are discounting the 2.7L engine simply because of its size. I believe that to be as big of a mistake as those who did the same a few years ago to the 3.5L EcoBoost.
 
  #12  
Old 08-02-2014, 11:18 AM
03 SVT VERT's Avatar
03 SVT VERT
03 SVT VERT is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'd get the 3.2L Powerstroke.

Really though, I'm torn between the 5.0 and the 3.5L ecoboost. My fun side wants to get a regular cab/short bed 5.0 and then add a blower. My more practical side says crew cab ecoboost.
 
  #13  
Old 08-02-2014, 11:41 AM
DIYiT's Avatar
DIYiT
DIYiT is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,250
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'd go with the 2.7 Ecoboost. I've got the 3.5 in my truck now with 3.55, and for how little I've actually used the power and gearing, vs the long interstate drives unloaded, I'd be fine going with the 3.31 gears, 2.7 Ecoboost and take advantage of the better fuel economy. That said, I've still got my '95 to play with when I need to tow, the V8 noise, or more power.
 
  #14  
Old 08-02-2014, 10:59 PM
Papa Tiger's Avatar
Papa Tiger
Papa Tiger is offline
Temporarily Deactivated
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: California
Posts: 22,894
Received 3,425 Likes on 2,340 Posts
Going with the 2nd generation EB motor for sure !
 
  #15  
Old 08-02-2014, 11:44 PM
j.grif's Avatar
j.grif
j.grif is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: plymouth mi
Posts: 730
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
I have a 3.5 twin turbo right now and love the engine, I have a max tow and need/want the torque and horsepower for towing my travel trailer.
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Question of the Week: Which 2015 Ford F150 Engine Would You Pick?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:19 AM.