Snow Testing the Ford Turbo Ranger - Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums



Ranger & B-Series All Ford Ranger and Mazda B-Series models

Snow Testing the Ford Turbo Ranger

Reply
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 07-28-2014, 04:16 PM
edtahaney edtahaney is offline
FTE Editor
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 323
edtahaney is starting off with a positive reputation.
Snow Testing the Ford Turbo Ranger

In the early 80’s Ford was going to put the 2.3L Turbo engine from the Thunderbird Turbo Coupe into a regular cab short bed Ranger. I was working at Roush Industries at the time and was assigned to this program. We had a half dozen development trucks and we were progressing through the testing required to put this into production.

It was scheduled for the 1985 model year. Since the Ranger was several hundred pounds lighter than the Thunderbird, these trucks were a riot to drive! And our development trucks had no indication that they were anything other than stock 4 banger trucks. They just hauled!

There was a new test under development at the time. Ford called it snow packing. If one were to drive in a severe blizzard the engine compartment could get filled with snow and cause problems. So Ford was developing a test to objectively determine how a vehicle would perform in those conditions.

Read the complete post here:

Snow Testing the Ford Turbo Ranger | Ford Trucks

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-29-2014, 12:01 AM
twigsV10's Avatar
twigsV10 twigsV10 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,834
twigsV10 is a splendid one to beholdtwigsV10 is a splendid one to beholdtwigsV10 is a splendid one to beholdtwigsV10 is a splendid one to beholdtwigsV10 is a splendid one to beholdtwigsV10 is a splendid one to behold
Snow packing as you put it was a big problem on my 89 Ranger, when going though drifts it would pack the engine compartment so full it would push the hood up. I fixed this buy making a plastic a skid plate from the front bumper to the sway bar mounts and have it stick back almost to the front axle, it completely eliminated any snow pushing up into the engine compartment and it also now goes over instead of though drifts.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-29-2014, 12:10 AM
twigsV10's Avatar
twigsV10 twigsV10 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,834
twigsV10 is a splendid one to beholdtwigsV10 is a splendid one to beholdtwigsV10 is a splendid one to beholdtwigsV10 is a splendid one to beholdtwigsV10 is a splendid one to beholdtwigsV10 is a splendid one to behold
It would have been nice if that plastic cover on the throttle linkage was still on my truck when I got it, had the throttle freeze wide open a time or two! Not cool.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-30-2014, 07:42 AM
mebe2k's Avatar
mebe2k mebe2k is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ford, WA
Posts: 882
mebe2k is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
why did they not continue with the 2.3 turbo ranger?? man that would've been sweet in a 2wd shortbox ranger..I guess Ford didn't want a truck that would be able to smoke a Mustang...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-30-2014, 02:55 PM
Mark Kovalsky's Avatar
Mark Kovalsky Mark Kovalsky is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: SE Florida
Posts: 14,846
Mark Kovalsky has a superb reputationMark Kovalsky has a superb reputationMark Kovalsky has a superb reputationMark Kovalsky has a superb reputationMark Kovalsky has a superb reputationMark Kovalsky has a superb reputationMark Kovalsky has a superb reputationMark Kovalsky has a superb reputationMark Kovalsky has a superb reputationMark Kovalsky has a superb reputationMark Kovalsky has a superb reputation
I never found out why it was cancelled. We were all very disappointed.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-30-2014, 09:16 PM
Old93junk's Avatar
Old93junk Old93junk is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: McKenzie River
Posts: 23,809
Old93junk has a superb reputationOld93junk has a superb reputationOld93junk has a superb reputationOld93junk has a superb reputationOld93junk has a superb reputationOld93junk has a superb reputationOld93junk has a superb reputationOld93junk has a superb reputationOld93junk has a superb reputationOld93junk has a superb reputationOld93junk has a superb reputation
Why couldn't we have had the 2.3 turbo Ranger instead of the anemic 2.9 V-6 "Ranger GT" of the same time period?..........or better yet a real Ranger GT with the same drivetrain of the 5.0 Mustang GT?
Why not, Mopar was stuffing 318s and 360s in Dakotas.
Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Emissions Engineering Evaluation letter from Ford doczenith1 6.7L Power Stroke Diesel 7 01-28-2016 10:57 PM
Snow Testing the Turbo Ranger Mark Kovalsky General Automotive Discussion 8 07-31-2014 02:25 PM
Ford F150 Roush 2000 upper control arms DRamseyer Lightning, Harley-Davidson F-150, Roush F-150 & Saleen F-150 4 07-18-2013 11:35 PM
Chat with an Engine Development Specialist Robb M. 2009 - 2014 F150 112 01-31-2011 06:41 PM
Roush F150 Project FTE Ken Projects 1 12-08-2008 01:51 PM


Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums >

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:24 AM.


This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.