EPA acknowledges that current emissions standards effect reliability - Page 2 - Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Diesel > General Diesel Discussion
Log In 


General Diesel Discussion SPONSORED BY:

EPA acknowledges that current emissions standards effect reliability

Reply
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #16  
Old 07-25-2014, 04:07 AM
BruteFord's Avatar
BruteFord BruteFord is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Kent WA
Posts: 2,937
BruteFord has much to be proud ofBruteFord has much to be proud ofBruteFord has much to be proud ofBruteFord has much to be proud ofBruteFord has much to be proud ofBruteFord has much to be proud ofBruteFord has much to be proud ofBruteFord has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjc transport View Post
but who can afford $65,000 for a truck?
All the people who buy them, the point is how much of that $65K is CAFE adjustment, EPA mandated equipment, and additional funds for expected EPA mandated warranty repairs.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-25-2014, 05:02 PM
92F350CC's Avatar
92F350CC 92F350CC is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 1,209
92F350CC has a brilliant future92F350CC has a brilliant future92F350CC has a brilliant future92F350CC has a brilliant future92F350CC has a brilliant future92F350CC has a brilliant future92F350CC has a brilliant future92F350CC has a brilliant future92F350CC has a brilliant future92F350CC has a brilliant future92F350CC has a brilliant future
The 6.7 gets double the MPG of the IDI or the 7.3 PSD?


I keep thinking about getting back into a diesel, but between the cost of fuel and maintenance as a result of the EPA, I can't quite justify it.
__________________
Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-25-2014, 05:54 PM
tjc transport's Avatar
tjc transport tjc transport is offline
i ain't rite
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: ElephantIsland Antarctica
Posts: 42,146
tjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by 92F350CC View Post
The 6.7 gets double the MPG of the IDI or the 7.3 PSD?
nope. it gets about the same as my IDI, and a little more than the 7.3 PSD.
my IDI with banks turbo gets around 15-16, and the PSD gets around 14
the 2010 and 2013 F-550 4X4 4Dr trucks get between 9 and 11 mpg loaded at 20,000 lbs, the 2014 F-350 gets 15-16mpg.
__________________
Tom
Alleged Moderator of the "not wrapped too tight forum"

owner of almost too many fords.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-25-2014, 06:55 PM
FORDF250HDXLT's Avatar
FORDF250HDXLT FORDF250HDXLT is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Maine/Oklahoma
Posts: 14,775
FORDF250HDXLT has much to be proud ofFORDF250HDXLT has much to be proud ofFORDF250HDXLT has much to be proud ofFORDF250HDXLT has much to be proud ofFORDF250HDXLT has much to be proud ofFORDF250HDXLT has much to be proud ofFORDF250HDXLT has much to be proud ofFORDF250HDXLT has much to be proud ofFORDF250HDXLT has much to be proud ofFORDF250HDXLT has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjc transport View Post
but who can afford $65,000 for a truck?
i can't even comprehend it,let alone afford that.to me that's so insane even if i had the $ to waste.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BruteFord View Post
Not when you can buy a replacement that gets twice the MPG.
31 years and they haven't even matched the economy of the 1983 6.9l diesel,first dropped into an f-series truck.a far cry from double.it's outright pathetic and they should be ashamed.
your not going to buy anything short of a little car that can double the economy.modern diesel trucks don't deliver the economy they should.the EPA and the power wars has crippled rational thinking and progression.

diesel trucks with their price tags and higher cost of fuel and maintenance are not,and have not been worth buying for the working class for a long while now.since the 6.0 was introduced.
__________________
Chip Truck: '93 F250HD XLT 4x4 Navistar 444ci IDI Diesel,Bull Moose IP w/ Hypermax SPL,Intercooled Banks Sidewinder Turbo,E4OD,3.55,Dually,9' Dump & Plow.

Log Truck: '93 F-Super Duty (F450) XLT Navistar 444ci IDI Diesel w/ Intercooled Banks Sidewinder Turbo,E4OD,5:13,Dually,16' Dump & Auto Crane.
The Toy: '68 T-bird Coupe 429TJ,C6,2:80
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-25-2014, 07:10 PM
Tedster9's Avatar
Tedster9 Tedster9 is online now
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Waterloo, Iowa
Posts: 9,139
Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.
Another group of vehicles that are waivered or need to be - all those MRAPS or whatever they are called, apparently DOD is going to retain title of them to get around pollution req's. Before I bought the Ranger had looked around for a small diesel truck and discovered none are really made here in America. Strange.

Sent from my iPhone using IB AutoGroup
__________________
Keep 'er between the ditches.

1964 F-100 292 V8
2009 XLT Ranger 4.0 V6
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 07-25-2014, 08:39 PM
BruteFord's Avatar
BruteFord BruteFord is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Kent WA
Posts: 2,937
BruteFord has much to be proud ofBruteFord has much to be proud ofBruteFord has much to be proud ofBruteFord has much to be proud ofBruteFord has much to be proud ofBruteFord has much to be proud ofBruteFord has much to be proud ofBruteFord has much to be proud of
When I said double I was getting at something like what Tedster9 said. We don't have many small diesels cause of EPA regulations. Look at the offerings even from ford in other countries.

My understanding is back in the day Ford was on track to go into production on a small diesel for the F150 and Expedition but was forced to stop by the new regs that went into effect in 2007.

As for diesel pickups I think the technology exists for an F350 to get 30, maybe even 40. IMO a combination of high temps, hybrid turbo tech, miller cycle, variable valve timing, electronic common rail injection, and many gear transmissions could get it there. In particular if matched with aero upgrades, an air dam and under pan.

Toss in a hybrid system much like is used in modern F1 cars and you'd really get there.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-25-2014, 10:56 PM
Tedster9's Avatar
Tedster9 Tedster9 is online now
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Waterloo, Iowa
Posts: 9,139
Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.
Well - I was looking for a diesel that doesn't cost an arm and a leg and a second mortgage. All that stuff sounds pretty goldanged expensive!

Sent from my iPhone using IB AutoGroup
__________________
Keep 'er between the ditches.

1964 F-100 292 V8
2009 XLT Ranger 4.0 V6
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-26-2014, 07:47 AM
tjc transport's Avatar
tjc transport tjc transport is offline
i ain't rite
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: ElephantIsland Antarctica
Posts: 42,146
tjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputation
just buy an old ford diesel. the tempo cars got 40+ mpg. same with the first gen ranger diesels.

or an old gas car. 60's falcons with a six cylinder would regularly get 30+ mpg.
heck, even my 65 289 4 barrel falcon with auto trans gets 25 MPG if you do not open the secondaries.
__________________
Tom
Alleged Moderator of the "not wrapped too tight forum"

owner of almost too many fords.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-26-2014, 09:01 AM
Tedster9's Avatar
Tedster9 Tedster9 is online now
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Waterloo, Iowa
Posts: 9,139
Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.
No no.. Small diesel *truck*, nobody makes one for US market.

Sent from my iPhone using IB AutoGroup
__________________
Keep 'er between the ditches.

1964 F-100 292 V8
2009 XLT Ranger 4.0 V6
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-26-2014, 10:47 AM
BruteFord's Avatar
BruteFord BruteFord is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Kent WA
Posts: 2,937
BruteFord has much to be proud ofBruteFord has much to be proud ofBruteFord has much to be proud ofBruteFord has much to be proud ofBruteFord has much to be proud ofBruteFord has much to be proud ofBruteFord has much to be proud ofBruteFord has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tedster9 View Post
No no.. Small diesel *truck*, nobody makes one for US market.

Sent from my iPhone using IB AutoGroup
Currently no, IIRC there was some Isuzus in the late 80's early 90s, There's the Volkswagon things, and I think there was a diesel Luv.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 07-26-2014, 11:09 AM
Tedster9's Avatar
Tedster9 Tedster9 is online now
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Waterloo, Iowa
Posts: 9,139
Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.
Yeah, that's what torqued me off. Then found it was simply bureaucratic BS.

Sent from my iPhone using IB AutoGroup
__________________
Keep 'er between the ditches.

1964 F-100 292 V8
2009 XLT Ranger 4.0 V6
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 07-26-2014, 02:03 PM
th3jared th3jared is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 62
th3jared is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Epa will most likely never go away either.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 07-26-2014, 03:43 PM
BruteFord's Avatar
BruteFord BruteFord is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Kent WA
Posts: 2,937
BruteFord has much to be proud ofBruteFord has much to be proud ofBruteFord has much to be proud ofBruteFord has much to be proud ofBruteFord has much to be proud ofBruteFord has much to be proud ofBruteFord has much to be proud ofBruteFord has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tedster9 View Post
No no.. Small diesel *truck*, nobody makes one for US market.

Sent from my iPhone using IB AutoGroup
Just stumbled on that Ford did a diesel ranger in the 80s.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 07-26-2014, 03:54 PM
tjc transport's Avatar
tjc transport tjc transport is offline
i ain't rite
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: ElephantIsland Antarctica
Posts: 42,146
tjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputationtjc transport has a superb reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by BruteFord View Post
Just stumbled on that Ford did a diesel ranger in the 80s.
yup, that is why i mentioned it in my post this morning.
__________________
Tom
Alleged Moderator of the "not wrapped too tight forum"

owner of almost too many fords.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 07-26-2014, 04:15 PM
Tedster9's Avatar
Tedster9 Tedster9 is online now
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Waterloo, Iowa
Posts: 9,139
Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.Tedster9 has a spectacular reputation.
Sure, was looking for current production small pickup though. it doesn't make any sense that these are verboten.
Though after last winter maybe would have had second thoughts.

Sent from my iPhone using IB AutoGroup
__________________
Keep 'er between the ditches.

1964 F-100 292 V8
2009 XLT Ranger 4.0 V6
Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
EPA threatens to make converting your truck/car into a racecar illegal. 54Hydro General Automotive Discussion 1 02-10-2016 07:50 AM
vw -- OOPS! ford2go General Automotive Discussion 18 09-29-2015 11:07 PM
EPA Requirements on our Diesel Engines wharrell 6.7L Power Stroke Diesel 44 09-26-2015 11:03 PM
VW diesel Recalls donovan General Diesel Discussion 6 09-23-2015 07:53 PM
EPA Gestapo helilog56 6.0L Power Stroke Diesel 10 07-15-2014 12:26 AM


Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Diesel > General Diesel Discussion

Tags
6.0, delete, dpf delete, egr, emissions, epa

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:02 PM.

 

Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup