Transit from E-Series: A Look into the New Ford Transit Vans
#16
I'm a letter carrier for the USPS and I agree, some vehicles shouldn't be used as a constant stop and go delivery vehicle. UPS like any other courier service
is start and stop and jamming through the gears all day.
I'm seeing a bunch of Sprinters in the FedEx fleet and I wonder how they're doing. *** communications is migrating to the Mercedes and Sprinters and they basically idle all day and they seem to be holding up well.
Sent from my Telegraph using IB AutoGroup
#17
There's no way to tell for sure without seeing maintenance records. In contrast, we know that the 6.0L diesel in the superduty trucks didn't hold up well at all and most larger fleets like *** have gotten rid of them.
#18
The point is, it is foolhardy to make claims as to the reliability or durability of a vehicle based on what one perceives a vehicle to be doing. You don't have any data to back up those claims.
#19
CAFE generally applies to vehicles under 8,500 GVWR. The Transit Full Size commercial vans discussed in this thread are 8,600 GVWR and over.
This is a Ford Truck forum. There's probably another forum online somewhere for promoting a political persuasion, but around here, discussions centered around Fords and facts are preferred.
#20
CAFE generally applies to vehicles under 8,500 GVWR. The Transit Full Size commercial vans discussed in this thread are 8,600 GVWR and over.
This is a Ford Truck forum. There's probably another forum online somewhere for promoting a political persuasion, but around here, discussions centered around Fords and facts are preferred.
This is a Ford Truck forum. There's probably another forum online somewhere for promoting a political persuasion, but around here, discussions centered around Fords and facts are preferred.
As for facts on this forum, take your lecture on facts around here, and go on a trip down threads that bring up Chevrolet products and come back and tell me that with a straight face.
The fact is, whether I supported him or not, which you don't know, based upon my comment, he led the charge on raising those standards. Government has put enormous pressure on the industry to improve efficiency in ALL vehicles. Heck, so has the marketplace, for that matter. I never said I was opposed to it, did I? In fact, I've been enjoying the 4+ mpg improvement of the Transit over our Express.
The Econoline was a good solid van, but was basically a 50 year old design tweaked and improved. They weren't going to get much out of it in weight, and thus, efficiency. Aerodynamically, it was a brick.
#21
I see a large number of fleets with 6.0 trucks that aren't going away. Xcel energy has a ton of pickups with the 6.0 and they seem to be hanging on to them.
The point is, it is foolhardy to make claims as to the reliability or durability of a vehicle based on what one perceives a vehicle to be doing. You don't have any data to back up those claims.
The point is, it is foolhardy to make claims as to the reliability or durability of a vehicle based on what one perceives a vehicle to be doing. You don't have any data to back up those claims.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post