Road Draft Tube How To
#1
#2
#5
The draft tube was useless sitting still and at speeds below 25 - 30 mph. This is why cars of the 1950`s had a 2,000 mile oil change interval. The oil would just become to saturated with combustion blow by that it had to be replaced.
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#8
#9
I think you are looking for something like this http://www.summitracing.com/parts/vpe-11189
It uses exhaust flow to create a venture and pull crankcase blowby out of engine into exhaust.
It uses exhaust flow to create a venture and pull crankcase blowby out of engine into exhaust.
#10
When you drive down the road the air blowing across the draft tube creates a low pressure suction on the end of the tube. This is the same effect on carburetors and how fuel is pulled from the carb.
Now as far as higher pressure forcing its way out through the draft tube, thats not how it always works. There has been numerous issues with draft tube equipped cars of the 1950`s that were blowing oil out past seals due to crank case pressure building up. As a combustion engine is running it is putting blow by pressure into the crank case, this is happening faster than it can find its own away out through the draft tube or the breather cap.
The main reason for PCV to come out and replace draft tubes was not entirely emission based. Chevrolet started using PCV setups on their engines starting in 1961/62 for example.
But if you want to believe that it was brought out for emission reasons then please, be my guest. I do not see it as the reason as the PCV had more benefits being more efficient than the draft tube over the emission point of view.
#11
if ur bound and determined ..
The above race-option of scavenging to the exhaust is used a lot...but a lot will depend on which engine you have, how well it returns oil to the pan, what rpms, and whether or not you need a catch-can setup....(another study)..
kudos for thinking outside the box though, for these obviously older engine designs we seem to like.
#12
There is another diesel forum I am a member of, and they sure have tried everything over there. Some guys just run a hose from the fitting on the top and let it hang down underneath. Works well enough, but it spits oil all over the bottom of the truck and when they were at a stoplight people would start waving at them thinking their truck was on fire. There is a lot of smoke that comes out.
Some guys tried the exhaust thing, but then they had terrible amounts of smoke coming out of the tailpipe, enough to be embarrassed about it and take it back off.
Some used the hose in combination with a homemade catch can for the oil. Worked ok but still smoked like a freight train.
Then they had a guy cut one of the CDR's apart, and found out how it really worked, and they then figured out these things by their design can rarely go bad and really never need replacing. The only downside to them is the back two cylinders can run a little hotter,, since they are burning some of the blowby oil from the cdr.
Some guys tried the exhaust thing, but then they had terrible amounts of smoke coming out of the tailpipe, enough to be embarrassed about it and take it back off.
Some used the hose in combination with a homemade catch can for the oil. Worked ok but still smoked like a freight train.
Then they had a guy cut one of the CDR's apart, and found out how it really worked, and they then figured out these things by their design can rarely go bad and really never need replacing. The only downside to them is the back two cylinders can run a little hotter,, since they are burning some of the blowby oil from the cdr.
#13
Genuine PCV systems (on gas engines) are a lot older than some people realize.
I have a 1942 6x4 GMC truck; these have the same 270 GMC engines as the 6x6.
Part-way through the war GM began sending PCV kits into the field to update the engines with, as trucks were serviced.......along with other ongoing upgrades over the production period.
The kit was just like a modern system, with a valve & the necessary piping (steel, not rubber) to plumb into the inlet manifold & rocker cover.
I have a 1942 6x4 GMC truck; these have the same 270 GMC engines as the 6x6.
Part-way through the war GM began sending PCV kits into the field to update the engines with, as trucks were serviced.......along with other ongoing upgrades over the production period.
The kit was just like a modern system, with a valve & the necessary piping (steel, not rubber) to plumb into the inlet manifold & rocker cover.
#14
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Dryden, ON, Canada
Posts: 5,330
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes
on
12 Posts
You don't want a RDT on a 6.9, the smoke will have people telling you your truck is catching fire. Been there, done that, have the t-shirt.
Why are you replacing the CDR valve every 25,000 miles?
All they ever need is a cleaning, they never wear out.
On the other hand, my 12V has a RDT, and you would never know it does with how little comes out of it.
Why are you replacing the CDR valve every 25,000 miles?
All they ever need is a cleaning, they never wear out.
On the other hand, my 12V has a RDT, and you would never know it does with how little comes out of it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post