Modular V10 (6.8l)  

First drive with 4.88s and I have questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 06-08-2014, 12:50 AM
JD'sBigredv10's Avatar
JD'sBigredv10
JD'sBigredv10 is offline
More Turbo
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Poway, CA
Posts: 629
Received 133 Likes on 63 Posts
I have a hard time making heads or tails of the reason why there are such wide variations in mileage. I am running 35.4" with 11" of tread making contact with the pavement. I have 2 1/2" leveling kit which exposes more of the truck to wind resistance. I am also configured heavy (4X4, CC, LB). Does all of that work against me to the tune of 4-5 MPG unloaded? Apparently so based upon Big78bronco's mileage. Luckily for me, I am good with 10 MPG. Heck I'm okay with 8. I love my truck and I am willing to pay that penalty.

Speaking of loving my truck...I hauled a yard of gravel (2800 lbs.?) up to the local mountains for a Boy Scout project today. This is a two lane winding road with about 3000 feet of elevation gain in 25 miles. This is the first time I've had a load in the truck since the new gears went in. I also recently added Stable Loads to keep the *** end from sagging so much when loaded. I can honestly say that this is the first time ever that "I didn't even feel the load back there". The truck just pulled constantly and almost never down shifted. As for the Stable Loads, I loved them. The first 1/2 yard settled the truck a couple inches and solidly engaged the overloads. When the second bucket went in...nothing. The rear didn't even budge. Handling on the winding road was perfect. The ride was excellent. I could not have asked for any more.

I am just two weeks away from starting a 3000 mile tow. That will be a real test!

And Kopperhed, I have 20 inch wheels on my truck (stock was 17") and although I am not a nuclear physicist, I do not consider myself a moron. If I am a moron (I have been called worse), I have lots of company because the roads and dealer lots are full of Super Duties with stock and aftermarket 20s. It is possible to build yourself a very capable truck on 17, 18 or 20 inch wheels. It may not be ideal but way more than adequate. Your Lariat edition is loaded with what many would consider superfluous BS that lessens it's capability. Every ounce of gingerbread is one less ounce of payload/towing capacity. The ultimate towing vehicle would not be particularly pretty or comfortable. Like life, it is all about balance.
 
  #17  
Old 06-08-2014, 06:12 AM
Im50fast's Avatar
Im50fast
Im50fast is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 3,084
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Yeah man, you can't just call people morons for getting bigger wheels- it's rude and it doesn't even make logical sense.

And you're crazy if you think you'll get increased MPG at 3,250rpm compared to 1,800. It's called injector pulse width: look it up.

The 3,250 peak torque is based on full throttle testing. Not part-throttle driving.

When you refer to "peak torque" being "max efficiency" it's only half true. Some people consider power or torque as efficiency. Others: MPG. Others: speed or velocity.

Like the guy just said above me: it's about balance.
 
  #18  
Old 06-08-2014, 09:35 AM
78bigbronco's Avatar
78bigbronco
78bigbronco is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JD'sBigredv10
I have a hard time making heads or tails of the reason why there are such wide variations in mileage. I am running 35.4" with 11" of tread making contact with the pavement. I have 2 1/2" leveling kit which exposes more of the truck to wind resistance. I am also configured heavy (4X4, CC, LB). Does all of that work against me to the tune of 4-5 MPG unloaded? Apparently so based upon Big78bronco's mileage. Luckily for me, I am good with 10 MPG. Heck I'm okay with 8. I love my truck and I am willing to pay that penalty.
Yeah I have a hard time believing a mild lift and moderately larger tires actually result in less mpg than hauling say 8,000 extra pounds, but rarely have I ever heard anyone with 35's or bigger getting much more than 10-12. And I really want to get atleast 35's... but think I'm going to have to find a more efficient daily driver first!
 
  #19  
Old 06-15-2014, 02:46 PM
Boss08v10's Avatar
Boss08v10
Boss08v10 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Elk River, MN
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Kopperhed
I think the biggest hogs are the old 2-valve pre-'05 V10s that made less power, thus your foot is to the floor more often. I just bought a 2010 F250 SuperCab longbed FX4 Lariat 2 weeks ago, that rolled off the line with 18" wheels, and some moron changed out to 20"s......so it has 34" tires. No towing yet, but 2 tanks of mostly highway driving and I'm getting 10.3 mpg. Not complaining, because it runs great unloaded, and I'm hopping off the deisel bandwagon. But I'm going to put 17"s on it before I tow anything heavier than a 20' boat, because it is geared with 4.10s, and the tall tires keep the engine rpms too low. The V10 wants to rev, and it's torque peak is at 3250, which is where the engine is running most efficiently. This ideally would be the rpms at highway cruise for best mileage.
I haul 42' Trailer that weights 14,000 plus on my 20's and 4.10's with no issues whatsoever. I rarely ever see 3250 rpm mostly overdrive at 2200 rpm.

I get 11-12 mpg empty and 6-7 towing but I tow at 65-70 mph because I am not retired and my weekends only have so much free time.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Technologiq
Excursion - King of SUVs
10
05-29-2013 08:42 PM
ddrws6ta
1997 - 2003 F150
4
09-09-2010 09:26 PM
ford390gashog
General Automotive Discussion
10
06-09-2007 12:25 AM
SPL Tech
Excursion - King of SUVs
17
04-02-2007 05:11 AM
heavnbound
Excursion - King of SUVs
8
11-23-2004 09:57 AM



Quick Reply: First drive with 4.88s and I have questions



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:16 AM.