If you could build any engine for your truck
#61
#62
Something I hadn't thought about was supplying fuel to a performance engine with the dual tank setup. Is it as simple as upgrading the in line pump or would the in tank pumps need upgrading as well.
Another option would be to swap to a big single tank and use a good in tank pump to run everything.
Another option would be to swap to a big single tank and use a good in tank pump to run everything.
#64
#65
Something I hadn't thought about was supplying fuel to a performance engine with the dual tank setup. Is it as simple as upgrading the in line pump or would the in tank pumps need upgrading as well.
Another option would be to swap to a big single tank and use a good in tank pump to run everything.
Another option would be to swap to a big single tank and use a good in tank pump to run everything.
Good news is, there's plenty of places that make higher LPH fuel delivery modules for this setup. Slide off old FDM, slide on new FDM, done.
That said, the 92-96 trucks all had the same LPH pump, regardless of engine. If memory serves me correctly, the stock pump is 120 LPH.
Last edited by Bob Gervais; 03-10-2014 at 11:22 AM. Reason: Stock pump info
#66
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Backwoods of Snowflake AZ
Posts: 10,080
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
I believe Bob that 90 or 91+ have no on the rail fuel pump because my brothers 91 F250 460 has no on the rail fuel pump. But yes the 92-96s did have the non inline fuel pump.
My dream built engine would be a super charged 6.8L V10 in one of these older trucks.
That or a nicely built 460 like we had in the 93 F250 we had before (that is for one of the F250s+ trucks)
Trav
My dream built engine would be a super charged 6.8L V10 in one of these older trucks.
That or a nicely built 460 like we had in the 93 F250 we had before (that is for one of the F250s+ trucks)
Trav
#67
Pretty sure the inline pump was only an 87-91 thing. Your truck should have one pump in each tank, no framerail pump.
Good news is, there's plenty of places that make higher LPH fuel delivery modules for this setup. Slide off old FDM, slide on new FDM, done.
That said, the 92-96 trucks all had the same LPH pump, regardless of engine. If memory serves me correctly, the stock pump is 120 LPH.
Good news is, there's plenty of places that make higher LPH fuel delivery modules for this setup. Slide off old FDM, slide on new FDM, done.
That said, the 92-96 trucks all had the same LPH pump, regardless of engine. If memory serves me correctly, the stock pump is 120 LPH.
#68
#69
#70
I'm bumping this up with one final question. I'm going with a small block and keeping a manual tranny. Since I'll be running a manual and MAF, could I use a Mustang computer and wiring harness or does the games need to come from a truck. Just trying to expand myoptions of sourcing the wires out.
#73
Glad to hear you decided on a engine platform - keep us up to date on your build.
If money was no object for me, I'd be dropping in an Ecoboost engine. Either the 2.0l or the 3.5l. I'm only running 2WD with stock size tires and don't typically haul heavy loads, so I don't need the power most of you are talking about. The 4.9l in my truck is cool, but I miss revving the **** out of an engine (looking forward to getting my Mustang back out ). The big thing for me is not having to stop for fuel as often and besides going diesel, reducing the displacement is the way to do it. Having the turbos keeps the power in the same ballpark (if not higher) and keeps the torque down low where I might need it if I did decide to carry something heavy. On top of all that, it would be unique. If I went the 2.0l route there would be a lot more room under the hood too. All in all, that would my ideal setup for this truck.
If money was no object for me, I'd be dropping in an Ecoboost engine. Either the 2.0l or the 3.5l. I'm only running 2WD with stock size tires and don't typically haul heavy loads, so I don't need the power most of you are talking about. The 4.9l in my truck is cool, but I miss revving the **** out of an engine (looking forward to getting my Mustang back out ). The big thing for me is not having to stop for fuel as often and besides going diesel, reducing the displacement is the way to do it. Having the turbos keeps the power in the same ballpark (if not higher) and keeps the torque down low where I might need it if I did decide to carry something heavy. On top of all that, it would be unique. If I went the 2.0l route there would be a lot more room under the hood too. All in all, that would my ideal setup for this truck.
#74
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
afinepoint
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
15
08-28-2007 05:30 PM
RapidRuss
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
8
04-25-2007 06:42 AM