Gear ratio question - Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Older, Classic & Antique Trucks > 1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
Log In 


1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks

Gear ratio question

Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 02-04-2014, 05:53 PM
my 66 my 66 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 217
my 66 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Gear ratio question

I have a 65 f-100 with a 302 with a mild cam. The truck has a 5 spd out of a 95 f-150 I-6. I have the rearend out of the truck the trans came out of and i want to put it in the truck. The tag on the rearend has S842A
73 88 1A09
Can someone tell me the ratio of this rearend?
Also has anyone had this setup are close to it and how did it work? I will pull a car trailer now and then and i would like to know if it will do the job?
Thanks for any help you can give.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-04-2014, 06:35 PM
norfolknova norfolknova is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: 7th realm of hell, Va.
Posts: 754
norfolknova is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
It looks like you are missing a digit, but from what you posted it looks like a 3.73 gear with an 8.8 inch ring gear made in 1991?? january 9th

I found this using google

Differential Identification | West Coast Differentials

You should do o.k. towing with that combo

matt
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-04-2014, 07:00 PM
rla2005's Avatar
rla2005 rla2005 is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 9,783
rla2005 is a splendid one to beholdrla2005 is a splendid one to beholdrla2005 is a splendid one to beholdrla2005 is a splendid one to beholdrla2005 is a splendid one to beholdrla2005 is a splendid one to beholdrla2005 is a splendid one to beholdrla2005 is a splendid one to behold
OBS trucks never came with 3.73 gears from the factory. I think we need more tag numbers.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-04-2014, 08:03 PM
my 66 my 66 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 217
my 66 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Thanks

Thanks for the replys i will recheck the tag tomorrow and she if i can see the missing number and let ya'll know. Thanks Don
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-04-2014, 10:03 PM
M_Jennings's Avatar
M_Jennings M_Jennings is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 46
M_Jennings is starting off with a positive reputation.
most likely 2.73
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-05-2014, 08:05 AM
rla2005's Avatar
rla2005 rla2005 is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 9,783
rla2005 is a splendid one to beholdrla2005 is a splendid one to beholdrla2005 is a splendid one to beholdrla2005 is a splendid one to beholdrla2005 is a splendid one to beholdrla2005 is a splendid one to beholdrla2005 is a splendid one to beholdrla2005 is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by M_Jennings View Post
most likely 2.73
X2
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-05-2014, 08:48 AM
my 66 my 66 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 217
my 66 is starting off with a positive reputation.
checked the tag this morning and their is a 2 next to the bolt which makes it a 2.73 ratio. So with my 302 how will it be suited for pulling a car trailer now and then. I looked on the west coast site and it stated small block should turn 1800, to 2800 rpms at highway speed. so is highway speed 55, 60,65or70 mph. The site said 2.73 with 235-75-r15 at 70mph it will turn about 1779 rpms. What do ya'll think?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-05-2014, 08:51 AM
rla2005's Avatar
rla2005 rla2005 is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 9,783
rla2005 is a splendid one to beholdrla2005 is a splendid one to beholdrla2005 is a splendid one to beholdrla2005 is a splendid one to beholdrla2005 is a splendid one to beholdrla2005 is a splendid one to beholdrla2005 is a splendid one to beholdrla2005 is a splendid one to behold
No way would I ever consider a 2.73 gear ratio in any truck. 3.55 or better is my recommendation. Why Ford ever put such a tall gear in a truck is beyond me.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-05-2014, 09:42 AM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski Conanski is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 21,800
Conanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud of
This should say it all, the factory tow rating for an I6 truck with manual trans and 2.73 gears was ZERO. Go find yourself a 3.55LS axle.. it was very common in 5.0 and 5.8 1/2 ton trucks.
__________________
Paul (Conan) O'Brien

2006 E250 4.6L 4R75w 4.10, 2004 Ranger 3.0L 5-sp X-cab 4.10, 1994 Ranger 3.0L 5-sp x-cab 3.45, 2004 Subaru Legacy 2.5L 5-spd
1996 Kawasaki ZX11D, 2002 Honda VFR800,
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-05-2014, 10:26 AM
skyfox10's Avatar
skyfox10 skyfox10 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: southwest michigan
Posts: 2,294
skyfox10 has a very good reputation on FTE.skyfox10 has a very good reputation on FTE.skyfox10 has a very good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Conanski View Post
This should say it all, the factory tow rating for an I6 truck with manual trans and 2.73 gears was ZERO.
I think it was actually zero to 2100 lbs

The 3.55 with bring that up to 3600.
__________________

1996 F150: RC/SB / 351 / E4OD / 4x4 / 3.08 / Eddie Bauer
2000 F250: SC/SB / V10 / 4R100 / 4x4 / 3.73 / XLT
2000 Mountaineer: / 5.0 / 4R70W / AWD / 3.73 LS
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-05-2014, 04:05 PM
my 66 my 66 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 217
my 66 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Ok we not putting the 2.73 rear in the truck. Now, the tag on the stock rear reads BG-f2 3.89 3MG 301. I think this tells me its a 3.89 ratio rear which should pull my trailer fine. So if i rebuild my stock 9" rear with the 3.89 i would like to get another chunk and put some taller gears for when i'am around home in south louisiana (flat) and not pulling are carrying a load. Would 2.73 be ok with my 302 mild cam 5 spd?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-05-2014, 05:45 PM
rla2005's Avatar
rla2005 rla2005 is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 9,783
rla2005 is a splendid one to beholdrla2005 is a splendid one to beholdrla2005 is a splendid one to beholdrla2005 is a splendid one to beholdrla2005 is a splendid one to beholdrla2005 is a splendid one to beholdrla2005 is a splendid one to beholdrla2005 is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by my 66 View Post
Ok we not putting the 2.73 rear in the truck. Now, the tag on the stock rear reads BG-f2 3.89 3MG 301. I think this tells me its a 3.89 ratio rear which should pull my trailer fine. So if i rebuild my stock 9" rear with the 3.89 i would like to get another chunk and put some taller gears for when i'am around home in south louisiana (flat) and not pulling are carrying a load. Would 2.73 be ok with my 302 mild cam 5 spd?
See my answer in Post# 8: Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums - View Single Post - Gear ratio question

That 302 needs RPM to build some torque. Add in a "mild cam" now your power curve is shifted to the right versus a stock 302. That means it may makes less torque for the same RPM in the lower RPM range. Stick to the 3.89 geared 9" and call it day.
Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2014, 05:45 PM
 
 
 
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dana 60 Rearend swap gtotiger65 1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks 11 06-01-2015 04:47 PM
65 ford f100 rearend ? diesel jim 1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1 09-17-2013 08:40 AM
Tell me about my Dana 70 Rearend brobrad 1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks 15 05-08-2012 01:13 AM
Axle-Driveline-U-Joint confusion. DutchB100 1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks 10 01-14-2012 08:15 PM
1988 ranger auto overdrive problems wm427 Ranger & B-Series 4 06-02-2001 11:02 AM


Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Older, Classic & Antique Trucks > 1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:35 PM.

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup