Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Older, Classic & Antique Trucks > 1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 01-13-2014, 09:32 AM
Doc's Avatar
Doc Doc is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: East KY
Posts: 3,843
Doc is a splendid one to beholdDoc is a splendid one to beholdDoc is a splendid one to beholdDoc is a splendid one to beholdDoc is a splendid one to beholdDoc is a splendid one to behold
Aluminum F-150

Thought this might interest you guys. I wonder what kind of MPG's these trucks are gonna get.

Aluminum-intensive 2015 Ford F-150 revealed | Fox News
__________________
Shane
1949 F1, Stock / 1950 F-5
1950 F1, 302, AOD (still in a lot of pieces)
1997 F150 XLT, 4.6L
2008 F250 XLT, 6.4L Powerstroke
2011 Expedition EL
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-13-2014, 09:46 AM
FortyNiner's Avatar
FortyNiner FortyNiner is online now
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: u-rah-rah Wisconsin
Posts: 1,556
FortyNiner has a great reputation on FTE.FortyNiner has a great reputation on FTE.FortyNiner has a great reputation on FTE.FortyNiner has a great reputation on FTE.FortyNiner has a great reputation on FTE.
Class-exclusive integrated loading ramps and a remote opening tailgate will be offered...

Mercy - a remote for THE TAILGATE?
__________________

19 and 49 F1 jes' like Henry II built

DW
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-13-2014, 10:39 AM
raytasch's Avatar
raytasch raytasch is online now
Old guy with old toys
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: S.E. TN
Posts: 3,755
raytasch is a splendid one to beholdraytasch is a splendid one to beholdraytasch is a splendid one to beholdraytasch is a splendid one to beholdraytasch is a splendid one to beholdraytasch is a splendid one to behold
Let me see, my '07 is how old? But, only 55,000 miles thereon. Recon I need a new truck?
__________________
Ray
1949 F-4 Built to drive--script bed.
1956 F350 Stock rebuilt script bed
2007 F150 SC. Driven once in a whle.
If there’s one thing that the government is highly skilled at, it is creating excessive amounts of bureaucracy and extra layers of red tape for people to wade through.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-13-2014, 10:58 AM
Doc's Avatar
Doc Doc is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: East KY
Posts: 3,843
Doc is a splendid one to beholdDoc is a splendid one to beholdDoc is a splendid one to beholdDoc is a splendid one to beholdDoc is a splendid one to beholdDoc is a splendid one to behold
I'm thinking I'd rather hold out for the 2016 Model. I remember when that truck "revolution" was happening back in the 90's. Dodge kind of got the ball rolling, and the others had to keep up. I bought a 1997 F-150 (the first year of the entirely new look). It had (and still has) some issues that were quickly corrected for the next model year. The one that comes to my mind was the brake rotors. Ford got em WAY too tight. Basically, they had to be broken off the spindles during the first brake job. Ask anybody who owned a brand new 97--they'll remember the hell of trying to get those rotors off. There were some other issues as well. The exhaust was in an awkward place, the oil filter was in a very vulnerable location, etc. etc.

Considering so many people like the patina, or primered, look now, I wonder if there will be an option of "no paint". Just let the aluminum shine, LOL.
__________________
Shane
1949 F1, Stock / 1950 F-5
1950 F1, 302, AOD (still in a lot of pieces)
1997 F150 XLT, 4.6L
2008 F250 XLT, 6.4L Powerstroke
2011 Expedition EL
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-13-2014, 11:11 AM
topmoo's Avatar
topmoo topmoo is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,182
topmoo is a splendid one to beholdtopmoo is a splendid one to beholdtopmoo is a splendid one to beholdtopmoo is a splendid one to beholdtopmoo is a splendid one to beholdtopmoo is a splendid one to beholdtopmoo is a splendid one to beholdtopmoo is a splendid one to behold
"electronic driver assist features include adaptive radar cruise control, a blind-spot warning system and lane-keeping assist, which uses a camera to help steer the truck between the lines on the road."

There are a lot of drivers here in Houston that really, really need this feature!

I am wondering what the price tag for these is going to be...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-13-2014, 11:27 AM
Doc's Avatar
Doc Doc is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: East KY
Posts: 3,843
Doc is a splendid one to beholdDoc is a splendid one to beholdDoc is a splendid one to beholdDoc is a splendid one to beholdDoc is a splendid one to beholdDoc is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by topmoo View Post
"electronic driver assist features include adaptive radar cruise control, a blind-spot warning system and lane-keeping assist, which uses a camera to help steer the truck between the lines on the road."

There are a lot of drivers here in Houston that really, really need this feature!

I am wondering what the price tag for these is going to be...
All good points!! LOL I wonder about the price tag too.

For those of you who have been to Truckstock, can you imagine me trying to drive that truck down my little crooked, broken, narrow road with that "lane-keeping assist" stuff? Can you imagine how hard it would slam me into the hillside or throw me over the edge when it encountered that little squiggly white line they drew around that hole in the pavement? I'm sure you guys remember the one I'm talking about. A bunch of you laughed hard about it.
__________________
Shane
1949 F1, Stock / 1950 F-5
1950 F1, 302, AOD (still in a lot of pieces)
1997 F150 XLT, 4.6L
2008 F250 XLT, 6.4L Powerstroke
2011 Expedition EL
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-13-2014, 12:00 PM
Jag Red 54's Avatar
Jag Red 54 Jag Red 54 is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 4,279
Jag Red 54 has a very good reputation on FTE.Jag Red 54 has a very good reputation on FTE.Jag Red 54 has a very good reputation on FTE.
I hope that the basic truck is not changed. However, one article says that they may shrink the engine some to promote mpgs. As for the price, Ford says that they will continue the 2014 pricing and make up the difference on reduced recycling costs. I guess the revenue from recycling AL vs FE is a lot! But seriously folks. NO MORE RUST! Talk about keeping the vehicles on the road a long time. People in the snow belt should love this improvement. JAG
__________________
54 F100
55 Fairlane
68 F100
55 Crown Victoria
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-13-2014, 12:15 PM
ALBUQ F-1's Avatar
ALBUQ F-1 ALBUQ F-1 is offline
postin' fool
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Albuquerque area
Posts: 16,969
ALBUQ F-1 has much to be proud ofALBUQ F-1 has much to be proud ofALBUQ F-1 has much to be proud ofALBUQ F-1 has much to be proud ofALBUQ F-1 has much to be proud ofALBUQ F-1 has much to be proud ofALBUQ F-1 has much to be proud ofALBUQ F-1 has much to be proud of
Aluminum "rusts", mostly due to salt. Not the same way as steel, but it disappears. Where it contacts steel, and gets salt, whoa nelly! No question it is better than steel from a corrosion standpoint, but I bet this gives refinishers fits.

Did I read that right that there won't be a manual trans option, only 6-sp autos????

I'd rather see them quit trying to make vehicles that can survive a head-on with a locomotive at 65 mph, and get the weight back down where it was in the late 60's/early 70's.
__________________
Ross
1952 F-1 Flat V8 3-on-the-tree MSD, Rochester 2G, Red's Headers
“It’s really hard to make predictions, especially about the future.” -- Yogi Berra
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-13-2014, 12:25 PM
MisterCMK's Avatar
MisterCMK MisterCMK is offline
Avid Winter Hater
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Maple Grove, MN
Posts: 19,383
MisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by ALBUQ F-1 View Post
Aluminum "rusts", mostly due to salt. Not the same way as steel, but it disappears. Where it contacts steel, and gets salt, whoa nelly! No question it is better than steel from a corrosion standpoint, but I bet this gives refinishers fits.

Did I read that right that there won't be a manual trans option, only 6-sp autos????

I'd rather see them quit trying to make vehicles that can survive a head-on with a locomotive at 65 mph, and get the weight back down where it was in the late 60's/early 70's.
There hasn't been a manual option for a number of years.

You want to see more people killed in auto accidents?
__________________
Chris - Avid Winter Hater
2007 F-250 XLT 4x4 CC SB 6.0 PSD - ARP, IPR Gen2 EGR Delete, 4" turbo-back, no muffler, no cat, 6.4 banjo bolts, SCT X3, EA 270A Alt, coolant filter, air bags, Ranchos, etc.
1994 Mustang GT - HCI, Novi2k blower, MM suspension parts, etc
Hope & A Prayer Motorsports
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-13-2014, 12:38 PM
Gicknordon's Avatar
Gicknordon Gicknordon is online now
Elder User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Birdsboro PA
Posts: 706
Gicknordon has a very good reputation on FTE.Gicknordon has a very good reputation on FTE.Gicknordon has a very good reputation on FTE.
gicknordon
Im interested what the new 2.7 eco boost engine will get for mileage, and if they bump up the hp on the 5.0 and the 3.5 eco boost. With out the 6.2, hopefully the eco boost will get a decent boost in power.
__________________
Nick Gordon
1997 F-350 crew cab long bed 7.3 powerstroke
1988 ford thunderbird turbo coupe
1948 F-1 project 429 big block
Build thread for 48 http://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/11...9-ford-f1.html
Photobucket album for 48 http://s1137.photobucket.com/albums/...don/49%20ford/
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-13-2014, 01:04 PM
ALBUQ F-1's Avatar
ALBUQ F-1 ALBUQ F-1 is offline
postin' fool
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Albuquerque area
Posts: 16,969
ALBUQ F-1 has much to be proud ofALBUQ F-1 has much to be proud ofALBUQ F-1 has much to be proud ofALBUQ F-1 has much to be proud ofALBUQ F-1 has much to be proud ofALBUQ F-1 has much to be proud ofALBUQ F-1 has much to be proud ofALBUQ F-1 has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterCMK View Post
There hasn't been a manual option for a number of years.

You want to see more people killed in auto accidents?
Well, that ices the cake, cancel my order! Last thing I need is an automatic that costs $4k+ to rebuild.

I don't wish more people to die in accidents, but lighter pickups would HELP the people who get smacked by an F-150 while driving their <3,000 lb cars.
__________________
Ross
1952 F-1 Flat V8 3-on-the-tree MSD, Rochester 2G, Red's Headers
“It’s really hard to make predictions, especially about the future.” -- Yogi Berra
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-13-2014, 01:07 PM
Nojive55 Nojive55 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: KC Kansas metro
Posts: 195
Nojive55 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Around here if it ain't nailed down and painted aluminum has a tendency to disappear. I can see coming out in the morning and having all the panels cut out of your new truck. Would definitely raise the scrap vs. repair break.

I have a question for you body men, would these be harder or easier to repair (patch welding, shaping, filler etc.), what about painting, any special paint or prep.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-13-2014, 01:11 PM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Hacienda Heights CA
Posts: 55,291
NumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc View Post
I'm thinking I'd rather hold out for the 2016 Model.
2015 will be all new, not a 2009/2014 that is a 'restyled' 2004/2008.

Current F150 5.0L 2WD Super Crew with its fully boxed frame weighs 5,875 lbs. It's the heaviest of all the automakers "1/2 ton" pickups.

The dash in the 2015 looks like it came from a 2004/2014 Titan.

Bought this 1/22/2011: 2011 F150 Lariat 5.0L 2WD Super Crew: Optional Lariat Plus Package, heated/cooled captains chairs with flow thru center console/shifter, trailer brake controller. MSRP: $39,990.00.

Current 3.5L Eco-Boost is 365 HP, 5.0L is 360 HP. Y'all can have the Eco, 215 cid to power a 3 ton truck...how long will it last?

btw: Lariat comes standard with 5.0L, Eco-Boost is an option that adds about 1400 bucks to the MSRP. I told the salespeep no thanks in 2011, will say no thanks again when the time comes.
__________________
Bill / Retired Ford Parts Manager / SoCal Chapter Member / Part number research: 1928/2001 trucks & 1928/89 passenger cars.

2013 Escape FWD 2.0L Eco-Boost
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-13-2014, 01:25 PM
underthebridgejim's Avatar
underthebridgejim underthebridgejim is offline
FTE fan
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: paradise, northern calif.
Posts: 1,861
underthebridgejim has much to be proud ofunderthebridgejim has much to be proud ofunderthebridgejim has much to be proud ofunderthebridgejim has much to be proud ofunderthebridgejim has much to be proud ofunderthebridgejim has much to be proud ofunderthebridgejim has much to be proud ofunderthebridgejim has much to be proud ofunderthebridgejim has much to be proud of
This may be a stupid question, but in this day and age can you still order a "Plain Jane" model of anything, rubber/plastic mats no radio, etc?
__________________
Jimmy / 1950 F-1 / 302/C4
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-13-2014, 01:38 PM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Hacienda Heights CA
Posts: 55,291
NumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputationNumberDummy has a superb reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by underthebridgejim View Post
This may be a stupid question, but in this day and age can you still order a "Plain Jane" model of anything, rubber/plastic mats no radio, etc?
XL is the plain jane, MSRP begins at around 24,000 bucks for a Regular Cab w/a 3.7L V6.

Vinyl seats, rubber floor mat, crank windows standard equipment (except Super Crew), cloth seats, carpeting optional.

Power windows, door locks/keyless entry standard on Super Crew, optional on Regular & Super Cab.

All these trucks come with a radio and A/C. XL standard equipment radio is AM/FM/Clock, no C/D or Sync (optional).

I'm reading this from the 2013 brochure, haven't swung by the dealer yet for the 2014 version.

btw: The 2WD's have a very high step in height, the 4WD's are worse, running boards are optional. But none, including the 50 grand Limited (comes with 22" wheels), have a left side grab handle.

To get in, you have to grab onto the steering wheel...which, over time, won't do the steering column any good.
__________________
Bill / Retired Ford Parts Manager / SoCal Chapter Member / Part number research: 1928/2001 trucks & 1928/89 passenger cars.

2013 Escape FWD 2.0L Eco-Boost
Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2014, 01:38 PM
 
 
 
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Older, Classic & Antique Trucks > 1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The new Ford truck (2015) is announced! BassFantasizer General NON-Automotive Conversation 2 06-30-2014 02:23 AM
Aluminum Body alloro Expedition & Navigator 9 01-17-2014 02:13 AM
2015 F150 Shadowrider123 1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks 0 01-13-2014 10:45 PM
New 2015 F-150 spy pics and info/speculation. 640 CI Aluminum FORD 2015 F150 53 01-10-2014 04:17 AM
F-150 2015' radical design? ArtsBest 2009+ F150 10 01-06-2013 10:47 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup