Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > 6.2L V8
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


6.2L V8 Discuss the 6.2L V8

Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 01-04-2014, 06:48 AM
winginit's Avatar
winginit winginit is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: SOUTHBURY CT
Posts: 92
winginit is starting off with a positive reputation.
IS THE 6.2 A BIG BLOCK ?

What size is the motor,and hp ratings? Will
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-04-2014, 07:14 AM
Slowpoke Slim's Avatar
Slowpoke Slim Slowpoke Slim is online now
Senior User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Bismarck, ND
Posts: 228
Slowpoke Slim is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.Slowpoke Slim is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I don't think it's a "Big block" per se.

Hp is 385, torque is 405.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-04-2014, 07:18 AM
JohnnyThunder JohnnyThunder is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Moose Jaw Saskatchewan
Posts: 282
JohnnyThunder is starting off with a positive reputation.
I think it is considered a medium block and was designed with 7 liter displacement in mind. There are some running in drag racing.
__________________
John
2011 F250 Lariat FX4 CC 6.2 3.73's Retrax bed cover Jimmi Jammers & Gate Keeper 5 Star Tuned
2009 Ford Escape XLT 3.0 with leather
2011 Flagstaff V-Lite 30WRLS
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-04-2014, 07:31 AM
winginit's Avatar
winginit winginit is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: SOUTHBURY CT
Posts: 92
winginit is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyThunder View Post
I think it is considered a medium block and was designed with 7 liter displacement in mind. There are some running in drag racing.

That`s what i thought. thank`s Will.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-04-2014, 11:03 AM
rvpuller's Avatar
rvpuller rvpuller is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Home Base Nebraska
Posts: 2,304
rvpuller has a very good reputation on FTE.rvpuller has a very good reputation on FTE.rvpuller has a very good reputation on FTE.rvpuller has a very good reputation on FTE.
The 6.2 is a 379 cubic inch with a 4.01 bore with a 3.74 stroke motor. I grew up in the muscle car days and back then we considered the 289, 302, 289, 327, 340, 351W to name a few small blocks. When you got into the big bore motors like the 351C, 390, 427, 383, 440, 348, 396, 454 then they where big blocks, many of the big blocks shared the same block but longer strokes to make bigger displacement. So back then you would open up the hood and see a small motor like a 289 and it was small compared to a 351C so it was a small block.

I consider the 6.2 a big bore short stroke motor and when you get on it that's what it sounds like and it looks big under the hood.

Denny
__________________
Moderator 6.2 & V10 Forum
2013 F350 Lariat SC DRW 2WD 6.2 4.30 Gears Air Lifts 50 Aux tank
2003 HH Premier 35 FKTG
Retired 2000 F350 Lariat SC DRW V10 4.30 Gears BrakeSmart
Air Lifts 4X2
http://www.ford-trucks.com/guidelines.html
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-04-2014, 11:45 PM
03 SVT VERT 03 SVT VERT is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 414
03 SVT VERT has a good reputation on FTE.03 SVT VERT has a good reputation on FTE.03 SVT VERT has a good reputation on FTE.
The Bore Spacing is typically the determining factor.

Ford traditionally had three different bore spacings for their V8 engines:

4.38" was a "Small Block"
4.63" was a "Medium Block"
4.90" was a "Big Block"

That was further broken up into tall deck and short deck blocks. For example, Ford's old 302 and 351 (Windsor or Cleveland) both had a 4.38" bore spacing, but the former was a short deck block, while the latter was a tall deck block. Taller deck meant a longer possible stroke, which meant greater displacement without moving to the next bore spacing.

When they introduced the Modular Engine Family, the main characteristic of that family was a 100mm bore spacing. The 4.6L has it, the 5.0L coyote has it, the 5.4L has it, even the 6.8L V10 has it. In English measurements this would be a 3.937" bore spacing, making it essentially a smaller than small block using the old naming system.

Of course the problem you run into with the Modular family is that your bore spacing limits your displacement. Even with a tall deck block you're still limited to about 5.8L in a production Modular V8 engine. Hence why they had to create the 6.8L V10....it's essentially a 5.4L V8 with two more cylinders added.

Since everyone else was moving to 6+ liter V8's in various applications, Ford felt they needed a new engine design to be competitive. That required a different bore spacing, which then requires a completely new engine family. Hence why the 6.2L is from the "Boss" family and not from the "Modular" family, even though they share a lot in common.

Now the Boss engine family uses a 115mm bore spacing, which would be 4.53".

Here is the bore spacing on some other engines:
Chevy Small block (both traditional and modern LS family): 4.40"
Chevy Big Block: 4.84"
Chrysler/Dodge A and LA Small Block: 4.46"
Chrysler/Dodge B and RB Big Block: 4.80"
Modern Hemi Small Block: 4.46"

So where does the Boss engine family fit in? At a 4.53" bore spacing it's not a big block in the traditional sense. It's not really a small block either. It's closest to a medium block, though like the Modular family, it doesn't quite match the bore spacing of Ford's old medium block.

I guess, with all the true big blocks gone from regular production, we could say the 6.2L is a modern big block, but I feel like that would be confusing and just a little too inaccurate.


Maybe if Ford brought out a production version of the Boss engine with more than 428 cubic inches I could be swayed. That's about where the old medium block family stopped and GM's new small block stops at 427ci for a production engine. I think a new Boss with about 460ci would be just perfect. They could use it in the F650 and maybe a limited edition F250.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-04-2014, 11:51 PM
AlaskanEx's Avatar
AlaskanEx AlaskanEx is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Anchorage Alaska
Posts: 9,170
AlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slowpoke Slim View Post
I don't think it's a "Big block" per se.

Hp is 385, torque is 405.

your numbers are correct in a super duty, but in a f-150 they are 411HP and 430TQ
__________________
Russ-
2011 F-150 Limited #3679 6.2 V8 4x4, Retrax bed cover
2002 Excursion Limited V10 4x4, 2.5/2" lift, HIDs,20" DC wheels on Cooper LTZ, Daily Driver
1998 Expedition XLT 5.4 4x4,HIDs,16x8 ultra wheels,led taillights, Daily Driver
1991 F-250 lairat 4x4 5.0, 7'6" BOSS snow plow, Back Rack, Strobes, Work lights
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-08-2014, 07:25 PM
BlueOvalJunkie11 BlueOvalJunkie11 is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 51
BlueOvalJunkie11 is starting off with a positive reputation.
doesnt the 150 have a hotter cam for those numbers? or is the super duty 6.2 just detuned?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-09-2014, 06:29 AM
JohnnyThunder JohnnyThunder is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Moose Jaw Saskatchewan
Posts: 282
JohnnyThunder is starting off with a positive reputation.
They are actually closer than a glance would indicate. The F150 is rated on premium fuel where the SD is rated on 87 octane. The Ford engineer stated way back the SD was very close to 400 hp on premium fuel. Not sure what they did though to make that extra 11 or so hp.
__________________
John
2011 F250 Lariat FX4 CC 6.2 3.73's Retrax bed cover Jimmi Jammers & Gate Keeper 5 Star Tuned
2009 Ford Escape XLT 3.0 with leather
2011 Flagstaff V-Lite 30WRLS
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-18-2014, 12:08 AM
SDDL-UP SDDL-UP is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: North Idaho
Posts: 108
SDDL-UP is starting off with a positive reputation.
+1 03 SVT VERT

In no way is a 351C a "big block"! Even the 351M and 400 are just tall deck small blocks.

I would agree with your assessment of the 6.2L Boss as well. It's a small block with a lot of displacement potential.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-18-2014, 08:20 AM
FordmanNJ's Avatar
FordmanNJ FordmanNJ is online now
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 334
FordmanNJ is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.FordmanNJ is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Is the 6.2L V8 a big block?

Yes. It is the biggest block I have owned! LOL Before the current truck, my F150 had a 5.4 which was .4 liters more than any other V8 I owned. Ford 302 and Chevy 305. Everything else was a V6. If I were to purchase an inline 4, I would not know what to think of it. I would probably say where is the other half of the engine! LOL
__________________
2011 F250 XLT CCSB 4X4, 6.2L V8, 6R140, 3.73 Elocker, Cooper Discoverer A/T3 LT275/70R/18, Lariat Rims, Premium XLT, Chrome, FX4, Camper, Plow packages, ESOF and Powerscope mirrors Tuxedo Black Metallic
2008 Kodiak 30BHLS Travel Trailer
2005 Ford Explorer XLT 4x4 V6 4.0, 5RE55, 3.73LS
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-20-2014, 11:54 PM
Louisville Joe Louisville Joe is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 602
Louisville Joe is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
6.2L a 'big block'? Sure, about as big as you are going to see these days. As for the Cleveland/M/400's, SDDL-UP is right, they are small blocks. Bore spacing is the same as a Windsor.

I think the 'Boss' bore spacing as about the same as the old FE's.
Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2014, 11:54 PM
 
 
 
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > 6.2L V8

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
... miko6810 Modular V10 (6.8l) 9 06-04-2014 06:14 AM
Can someone explain this to me? 1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 10 03-28-2014 07:56 PM
. sgtrwg 1978 - 1996 Big Bronco 15 10-17-2012 06:13 PM
Exhaust (cat) 1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 7 08-22-2012 11:39 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup