1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Dentsides Ford Truck
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

which intake is better the edelbrock performer or performer RPM

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 12-05-2013, 03:48 PM
Montana4x4xFord's Avatar
Montana4x4xFord
Montana4x4xFord is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
which intake is better the edelbrock performer or performer RPM

It's a stock 360 in a 73 Ford f100 4x4 and I am going to start upgrading it. And I was wondering which one I should get,thanks.
 
  #2  
Old 12-05-2013, 04:16 PM
turbohunter's Avatar
turbohunter
turbohunter is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Northern and Southern Cal
Posts: 4,656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For me, it's a truck. The regular Performer is fine, especially for torque. The RPM is worth more hp but I just made 400 with a regular Performer (it was port matched though).
The very first thing I would do if you are doing one thing at a time is get rid of the stock exhaust and go with headers. These engines are choked off at the exhaust. Free it up and you'll feel it in your seat.
 
  #3  
Old 12-05-2013, 04:19 PM
rockittsled's Avatar
rockittsled
rockittsled is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
x2 on turbohunter until you start upping the compression and cam work
 
  #4  
Old 12-05-2013, 04:23 PM
Roger Carter's Avatar
Roger Carter
Roger Carter is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corbett, Oregon
Posts: 966
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
The choice comes down to which upgrades you are going to do. Decide on what you want to end up with and choose products that will work for the end result.

You also need to be honest with yourself. You aren't going to be able to have a four wheel tire shredder that delivers 22 mpg on the highway, and it is a pretty safe bet that a mild 360 won't do either.

The best information is going to come from Edelbrock. They want their customers to be pleased with their products. They won't steer you wrong.

Read their information on both intakes and decide accordingly.

Roger Carter
 
  #5  
Old 12-05-2013, 04:24 PM
Montana4x4xFord's Avatar
Montana4x4xFord
Montana4x4xFord is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what is the difference between the two ?
 
  #6  
Old 12-05-2013, 04:27 PM
Montana4x4xFord's Avatar
Montana4x4xFord
Montana4x4xFord is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am going to do 260h cam , and a 1405 edelbrock 600cfm 4 barrel carb. And I will do headers.
 
  #7  
Old 12-05-2013, 04:39 PM
rockittsled's Avatar
rockittsled
rockittsled is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
without going to the website myself, essentially the RPM has larger ports for more power... if the engine can suck the air and fuel through it, i.e. low compression= low suck...small cam=small suck
 
  #8  
Old 12-05-2013, 04:44 PM
rockittsled's Avatar
rockittsled
rockittsled is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe the 73 360ci had 8.0-1 CR
 
  #9  
Old 12-05-2013, 04:52 PM
turbohunter's Avatar
turbohunter
turbohunter is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Northern and Southern Cal
Posts: 4,656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Montana4x4xFord
I am going to do 260h cam , and a 1405 edelbrock 600cfm 4 barrel carb. And I will do headers.
So by your part selection you just want to warm it up a bit.
Then IMO (and you know what those are like) the Performer is great for you.
As Roger said, "be honest with yourself".
A warmed up 360 is a nice little engine but that's about it.
BTW I would do a compression test and make sure you have a good base to start with.
And above all else, HAVE FUN.
 
  #10  
Old 12-05-2013, 04:55 PM
Montana4x4xFord's Avatar
Montana4x4xFord
Montana4x4xFord is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So does what I want to get work?
 
  #11  
Old 12-05-2013, 05:04 PM
turbohunter's Avatar
turbohunter
turbohunter is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Northern and Southern Cal
Posts: 4,656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sure it'll work.
It's a good little torque cam.
Sounds like you are being very conservative and you just want a nice running truck.
 
  #12  
Old 12-05-2013, 05:10 PM
Roger Carter's Avatar
Roger Carter
Roger Carter is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corbett, Oregon
Posts: 966
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
For the parts you have listed I would go with the Performer intake. You won't have any need for what the RPM has to offer.

You should have a real nice running 360.

One thing I didn't see listed was an ignition upgrade. If you haven't already converted to an electronic ignition now would be a good time. I am partial tp the Ford Duraspark, but any decent conversion will do the job. If your distributor is in good condition the Pertronix conversion is hard to beat. Reasonably prices and easy to install.

RC
 
  #13  
Old 12-05-2013, 05:11 PM
orangeford's Avatar
orangeford
orangeford is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Eastern, Idaho
Posts: 888
Received 19 Likes on 13 Posts
Each intake will have an rpm range of power listed with it.

The RPM will breathe better at high rpm like 4000 up. The performer is better for a truck with normal driving. You want torque in a useable rpm range for what you plan to do with the truck. Sometimes the stock manifold is better just depends on what you want, fuel economy, pulling power, racing etc.

An intake is only a part of the process and changing one thing without changing others may not make the difference you are looking for.

As mentioned exhaust is usually the first choke point, I would go there first.
 
  #14  
Old 12-05-2013, 05:11 PM
Montana4x4xFord's Avatar
Montana4x4xFord
Montana4x4xFord is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do u have any idea at all where that would put me If did edelbrock intake the 260h cam, the 4 barrel carb,headers for HP and torque?
 
  #15  
Old 12-05-2013, 05:12 PM
turbohunter's Avatar
turbohunter
turbohunter is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Northern and Southern Cal
Posts: 4,656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Roger Carter
One thing I didn't see listed was an ignition upgrade.
RC
X2 on that.
 


Quick Reply: which intake is better the edelbrock performer or performer RPM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:28 AM.