2.3L Ecoboost - Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums



2009 - 2014 F150 Discuss the 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 Ford F150

2.3L Ecoboost

Reply
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 11-13-2013, 11:28 AM
hsfbfan hsfbfan is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 560
hsfbfan is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.hsfbfan is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
2.3L Ecoboost

Lincoln just introduced the 2015 MKC crossover. It has as an option a 2.3L Ecoboost engine that puts out 275 HP and 300 torque. Similar to the current 3.7L V6 standard in the F150.

Does this engine make it into the F150 lineup? Discuss......
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-13-2013, 11:52 AM
Tom's Avatar
Tom Tom is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Braham, MN
Posts: 21,370
Tom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputation
I think it would be a great choice, but I don't know if the average truck buyer would warm to the idea of a four-cylinder full size pickup.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-13-2013, 11:57 AM
Robbgt's Avatar
Robbgt Robbgt is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 3,232
Robbgt has a great reputation on FTE.Robbgt has a great reputation on FTE.Robbgt has a great reputation on FTE.Robbgt has a great reputation on FTE.Robbgt has a great reputation on FTE.
I would be willing to wager that that 2.3L EB will most likely carry higher price points than the 3.7L v6. This would most likely keep if from the lineup for companies and individuals who want stripped down base model work trucks.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-13-2013, 12:03 PM
Pool Runner's Avatar
Pool Runner Pool Runner is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 722
Pool Runner has a very good reputation on FTE.Pool Runner has a very good reputation on FTE.Pool Runner has a very good reputation on FTE.
I could see this in say XL, STX & XLT models. Reg/ Super Cab, preferably 6/speed manual, but we all know it would be automatic only. Probably not geared lower numerically than 3.55 at the least but 3.73 and a 4.10 option would be best suited. Would also likely be 2wd only, like the four cylinder EcoBoost Explorer?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-13-2013, 12:04 PM
seventyseven250's Avatar
seventyseven250 seventyseven250 is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 4,793
seventyseven250 has much to be proud ofseventyseven250 has much to be proud ofseventyseven250 has much to be proud ofseventyseven250 has much to be proud ofseventyseven250 has much to be proud ofseventyseven250 has much to be proud ofseventyseven250 has much to be proud ofseventyseven250 has much to be proud ofseventyseven250 has much to be proud of
It would be a nice option if they ever built a lighter weight F100 style truck, but on the current F150, I don't see it as an improvement over the current engines.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-13-2013, 07:11 PM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins tseekins is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 25,175
tseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputation
I've read where Ford is working on it's next gen EB engines also known as Nano engines. A 4 banger EB is reported to be on the horizon for the F-150.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-13-2013, 07:12 PM
efx4's Avatar
efx4 efx4 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,046
efx4 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.efx4 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Since the 2015 F-150's are targeted by Ford to go down by as much as 700 LBS. in vehicle weight, the 2.3 Eco sounds like a reasonable engine option in some models. I think it's a possibility.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-13-2013, 07:45 PM
KJ Smith KJ Smith is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 436
KJ Smith has a good reputation on FTE.KJ Smith has a good reputation on FTE.KJ Smith has a good reputation on FTE.
My wife currently drives a Ford Edge with the 2.0 ecoboost.

Its 240 hp. no clue on the Tq....

It moves the 4K lbs Edge around with no problems whatsoever.

You would never know it was a 4 banger.


While the 2.3 would be fine in a F150.... I don't think the Truck buying public is ready for that......... yet.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-13-2013, 11:14 PM
2ndStroke's Avatar
2ndStroke 2ndStroke is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 9,243
2ndStroke has a superb reputation2ndStroke has a superb reputation2ndStroke has a superb reputation2ndStroke has a superb reputation2ndStroke has a superb reputation2ndStroke has a superb reputation2ndStroke has a superb reputation2ndStroke has a superb reputation2ndStroke has a superb reputation2ndStroke has a superb reputation2ndStroke has a superb reputation
The 2.0 Eco in my escape is super fast. 275 hp sounds decent for a truck, maybe more for someone who might not tow heavily. The 4.6 3v was 292 hp, not that far off....
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-14-2013, 12:25 AM
Pool Runner's Avatar
Pool Runner Pool Runner is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 722
Pool Runner has a very good reputation on FTE.Pool Runner has a very good reputation on FTE.Pool Runner has a very good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2ndStroke View Post
The 2.0 Eco in my escape is super fast. 275 hp sounds decent for a truck, maybe more for someone who might not tow heavily. The 4.6 3v was 292 hp, not that far off....
It's not the hp I would be so worried about, it's the torque. While it's possible that this 2.3T could produce enough low-end grunt, but for how long and where would it fall off a cliff?

As crazy as it sounds, combining the 2.3T EcoBoost with say a CVT would help keep the power in the power band. My wife's car which is a 2013 Subaru Outabck (A somewhat heavy crossover vehicle) Only has a 170hp N/A 4-pot. But it "feels" more powerful than it actually is due to the CVT.

People may laugh or be uncertain about CVT's, and I was too before I owned one. But I am completely comfortable with them now, I also read one of the big three was considering a CVT in the heavy duty class to gain improved mpg's.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-14-2013, 12:27 AM
Tofan's Avatar
Tofan Tofan is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,088
Tofan is a name known to allTofan is a name known to allTofan is a name known to allTofan is a name known to allTofan is a name known to allTofan is a name known to all
Too bad they didn't think enough to put a 2.3 in a Ranger :rolls eyes
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-14-2013, 06:48 AM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins tseekins is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 25,175
tseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputation
LMAO!!! I remember this mirror image of conversations when rumors of the 3.5L in the F-150 were going around.

I think that we naysayers have been proven wrong. I'm keeping an open mind on this one.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-14-2013, 07:02 AM
tvsjr tvsjr is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,295
tvsjr has a great reputation on FTE.tvsjr has a great reputation on FTE.tvsjr has a great reputation on FTE.tvsjr has a great reputation on FTE.tvsjr has a great reputation on FTE.tvsjr has a great reputation on FTE.
As far as the additional cost over the 3.7 N/A for fleet purchases, I wouldn't be too sure of that. I'm seeing a *lot* of fleet F-150s running around with the 3.5EB in them, presumably for fuel savings.

For performance, keep in mind that it wasn't terribly long ago - 1997 - that the 5.4 was making 235hp @ 4250 and 335lb-ft @ 3000. The trucks have gained weight since then, but that will decrease for 2015 and probably get back down to where the 1997 trucks were. Plus, the turbo motor will deliver its power at much lower RPM.

I definitely wouldn't rule this one out - especially for people and fleets that use their trucks primarily to haul things around in the bed, and aren't towing heavy.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-14-2013, 07:50 AM
MCDavis's Avatar
MCDavis MCDavis is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: RVA
Posts: 10,320
MCDavis has a superb reputationMCDavis has a superb reputationMCDavis has a superb reputationMCDavis has a superb reputationMCDavis has a superb reputationMCDavis has a superb reputationMCDavis has a superb reputationMCDavis has a superb reputationMCDavis has a superb reputationMCDavis has a superb reputationMCDavis has a superb reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by tseekins View Post
LMAO!!! I remember this mirror image of conversations when rumors of the 3.5L in the F-150 were going around.

I think that we naysayers have been proven wrong. I'm keeping an open mind on this one.
I was waiting for someone to mention it, and I'm glad it was Tim.
For someone like myself who rarely tows, but uses his truck for moderate duty work around the house and for fun (hauling bikes, furniture, etc) where a SUV doesn't really fit the bill due to vertical space or completely destroying an interior, I see the possibility of a 2.3L EB being a strong contender. I'm curious to see how this plays out. If the 2.3L EB could produce similar performance to the current 3.7L V6 yet produce a touch more economy then why not, right? Plus I'm sure that with a touch of tuning the 2.3L could be a screamer.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-14-2013, 08:02 AM
Tom's Avatar
Tom Tom is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Braham, MN
Posts: 21,370
Tom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by MCDavis View Post
If the 2.3L EB could produce similar performance to the current 3.7L V6 yet produce a touch more economy then why not, right? Plus I'm sure that with a touch of tuning the 2.3L could be a screamer.
I bet that it would be a very similar comparison as between the current generation EB and 5.0L engine. Both make very similar amounts of power, but the EB makes more torque down low, so I would bet that the 2.3 would drive better. Just my opinion of course.
Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2016 2.3L Ecoboost Explorer Limited PrinceValium 2011 & Newer Explorer 24 07-23-2016 11:16 AM
I woul reall want Ford to build a super efficient truck ncalf150 Performance & General Engine Building 11 03-13-2015 01:19 AM
Question of the Week: Do you like the EcoBoost engine in the new Raptor? Patrick R. 2015+ F150 3 01-19-2015 10:24 AM
Is Synthetic oil OK for ecoboost in warranty. TraderD Performance & General Engine Building 1 05-06-2014 06:13 PM
The Ultimate Showdown! (6.2L vs Comparably Equipped Ecoboost F-150) ''Drag Race Clips'' 640 CI Aluminum FORD 2009 - 2014 F150 40 08-19-2011 07:48 AM


Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums >

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:33 AM.


This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.