Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

acceleration hesitation

  #1  
Old 11-01-2013, 05:30 PM
austinlittle34's Avatar
austinlittle34
austinlittle34 is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
acceleration hesitation

hello i have a 1990 f150 with a 4.9 and i have a real bad acceleration problem it bucks and sputters till 2000 rpms then smoothes out untill under 200 rpms and has to warm up for about 10 minutes to run right heres my specs;
idle : @925 rpms
battery voltage at idle :13.96 ( high output alternator)
fuel pressure : 22 psi at idle
oil pressure :42 psi @ 2000 rpms
coolant temp warmed up : 210 degrees farenheit
compression test: (psi)
1(125 2(122 3(122 4(121 5(130 6(125
no vaccum leaks ,new tps sensor ,new cap, rotor ,plugs and wires and coil and icm and fuel filter its got over sized valves all comp cams valve train and a ported head .also a cold air intake .
 

Last edited by austinlittle34; 11-01-2013 at 05:50 PM. Reason: forgot something
  #2  
Old 11-01-2013, 05:49 PM
timbersteel's Avatar
timbersteel
timbersteel is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mexico, Missouri
Posts: 4,698
Received 46 Likes on 36 Posts
Fuel psi should be 45-50 with vacuum line connected to FPR, removed should increase 5 psi. 22 psi is to low of fuel psi.
 
  #3  
Old 11-01-2013, 05:53 PM
danr1's Avatar
danr1
danr1 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sand Lake, MI
Posts: 5,670
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by timbersteel
Fuel psi should be 45-50 with vacuum line connected to FPR, removed should increase 5 psi. 22 psi is to low of fuel psi.
+1, find out why fuel pressure is half what it should be.
 
  #4  
Old 11-01-2013, 06:21 PM
timbersteel's Avatar
timbersteel
timbersteel is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mexico, Missouri
Posts: 4,698
Received 46 Likes on 36 Posts
I tried to edit my 1st post, but wanted to add this...

The symptoms you describe are Identical, with the exception of fuel psi, when my PCM failed due to leaking capacitors. The 4.9l seems to be plagued with leaking, blown capacitors versus the V8 PCMs. Just thought I would share.
 
  #5  
Old 11-01-2013, 07:29 PM
austinlittle34's Avatar
austinlittle34
austinlittle34 is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks for the responses timbersteel ill check my fuel pressure at the pump it self and see what i got cause the one i gave in my previous post was at the rail and i though 22 psi was pretty low
 
  #6  
Old 11-01-2013, 07:42 PM
danr1's Avatar
danr1
danr1 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sand Lake, MI
Posts: 5,670
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by austinlittle34
thanks for the responses timbersteel ill check my fuel pressure at the pump it self and see what i got cause the one i gave in my previous post was at the rail and i though 22 psi was pretty low
Fuel pressure at the pump is going to be the same as at the rail, check the fuel pressure regulator for proper operation.

Removing the vac line to it should increase the pressure 5 to 10 psi, if you get no increase at all that'd strongly suggest the FPR as the problem.

Still might be even if you see a rise in pressure vac line removed (engine running of course)

Check for signs of fuel in the vac line too.

Suggested quick test for low pressure, pinch off rubber section of return line (not completely but enough to greatly restrict flow back to tank). If pump is up to spec pressure should rise to or even beyond spec, if so replace FPR.

If restricting return line flow to tank does not increase fuel pressure reading, the pump would be suspect instead.
 
  #7  
Old 11-01-2013, 08:14 PM
austinlittle34's Avatar
austinlittle34
austinlittle34 is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ok sounds good ill do that and see what happens but i only have 22 psi before the regulator so how could it be the regulator just wondering
 
  #8  
Old 11-01-2013, 08:26 PM
danr1's Avatar
danr1
danr1 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sand Lake, MI
Posts: 5,670
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by austinlittle34
ok sounds good ill do that and see what happens but i only have 22 psi before the regulator so how could it be the regulator just wondering
Fuel pressure is regulated by what is allowed to flow back to the tank, low vacuum equates engine load equates to need for more fuel, low vacuum supplied to FPR it decreases amount of fuel allowed to flow back to tank by restricting flow through the return line as it leaves the rail.

Think of it like putting your thumb over end of garden hose to increase distance you can spray it, while no more water is coming to the end of the hose by limiting what can exit it you increase the pressure.
 
  #9  
Old 11-01-2013, 08:27 PM
austinlittle34's Avatar
austinlittle34
austinlittle34 is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i completely understand now thanks
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Slash19
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
35
06-09-2020 09:48 PM
goose_ss4
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
40
10-25-2015 01:32 AM
VIPERK30
1994.5 - 1997 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
12
06-22-2012 10:47 PM
John311t
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
34
03-29-2007 11:16 AM
klhwarf
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
6
03-03-2001 01:33 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: acceleration hesitation



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:21 PM.