Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

95 f150 302.what mafs can i use.tb and injector question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-19-2013, 07:29 PM
jrp79's Avatar
jrp79
jrp79 is offline
5th Wheeling
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
95 f150 302.what mafs can i use.tb and injector question

My mass air sensor is bad and was wondering what mafs i can use or does it have to be from a 95.
What size tb is stock and what size injectors.
My motor has a edrlbrock rolling thunder cam, shorty headers with no cats or mufflers.i want it to run as close to best with out a tune for now.
Was thinking about maybe mustang 19 or 24lb injectors, explorer 65mm tb and if a stang mafs caled for the 19s or 24s would work.
 
  #2  
Old 08-19-2013, 09:56 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,926
Likes: 0
Received 964 Likes on 763 Posts
Originally Posted by jrp79
My mass air sensor is bad...
My motor has a edrlbrock rolling thunder cam,
Are you sure it's not just the cam that's making the motor run bad.


Originally Posted by jrp79
What size tb is stock and what size injectors
Stock injectors are 19lb and the stock TB is a dual 52mm which is equal to a single 72mm.


.
 
  #3  
Old 08-19-2013, 10:09 PM
jrp79's Avatar
jrp79
jrp79 is offline
5th Wheeling
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Conanski
Are you sure it's not just the cam that's making the motor run bad.


Stock injectors are 19lb and the stock TB is a dual 52mm which is equal to a single 72mm.


.
Ok so id be better to keep stock tb and intake.was thinking about swapping to gt-40/explorer style intake.
Mafs is bad.i check for 12v at the live and both grounds and was good.the signal wire showed nothing
 
  #4  
Old 08-20-2013, 07:22 AM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,926
Likes: 0
Received 964 Likes on 763 Posts
Originally Posted by jrp79
was thinking about swapping to gt-40/explorer style intake.
That would be a downgrade.

Originally Posted by jrp79
Mafs is bad.i check for 12v at the live and both grounds and was good.the signal wire showed nothing
Signal wire should be at zero unless the engine was running. Are you also getting codes for the MAF?
If you do have to replace the meter then one from a 5.0 or 5.8 truck would be the best.
 
  #5  
Old 08-20-2013, 06:19 PM
jrp79's Avatar
jrp79
jrp79 is offline
5th Wheeling
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Conanski
That would be a downgrade.

Signal wire should be at zero unless the engine was running. Are you also getting codes for the MAF?
If you do have to replace the meter then one from a 5.0 or 5.8 truck would be the best.
Signal wire remained at zero even with truck at idle and rpm raising slow and fast.
Is the 5.8 maf the same as the 5.0.the 5.8 isnt bigger in dia. And its calibrated for the same as the 5.0 maf?
 
  #6  
Old 08-21-2013, 07:38 AM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,926
Likes: 0
Received 964 Likes on 763 Posts
Both trucks use the same MAF and injectors, and MAF meters aren't calibrated the computer is... those companies that sell "calibrated" MAF meters are lying to you.
 
  #7  
Old 08-28-2013, 10:39 AM
94_SVT's Avatar
94_SVT
94_SVT is offline
New User
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You will have a better top end with the explorer intake, but loose tq power...Im going Holley Systemax on mine
 
  #8  
Old 08-28-2013, 05:00 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,926
Likes: 0
Received 964 Likes on 763 Posts
Originally Posted by 94_SVT
You will have a better top end with the explorer intake, but loose tq power...Im going Holley Systemax on mine
The dyno results I have seen contradict that, the Explorer intake produces more low to midrange torque than all the others including the Holley which interestingly is heavily based on the 5.0 truck intake.
 
  #9  
Old 08-29-2013, 01:51 AM
UNTAMND's Avatar
UNTAMND
UNTAMND is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lansdale, PA
Posts: 3,634
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by 94_SVT
You will have a better top end with the explorer intake, but loose tq power...Im going Holley Systemax on mine
If you have a 351, the systemax intake is a great upgrade. If you have a 302/5.0 then the systemax lower is nearly identical to the stock truck lower.

The explorer intake is a good upgrade for a car or a lower reving engine. But there are plenty of better choices if you're willing to spend the money.
 
  #10  
Old 08-29-2013, 01:52 AM
UNTAMND's Avatar
UNTAMND
UNTAMND is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lansdale, PA
Posts: 3,634
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Oh, and if your maf is bad, you don't need to swap the whole meter, just swap the electronic piece on the top, no "calibration" required.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
covshark
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
24
02-13-2013 03:39 PM
TheRon
Bronco II
9
06-11-2009 09:07 AM
Jimn8or
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
5
12-10-2008 11:47 PM
pc_2000
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
04-28-2008 03:06 PM
gamudslinger88
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
9
01-29-2008 06:34 PM



Quick Reply: 95 f150 302.what mafs can i use.tb and injector question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:11 PM.