Budget performance help

  #1  
Old 06-06-2013, 12:42 AM
Silvestris's Avatar
Silvestris
Silvestris is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Budget performance help

I've got a 95 F-150 5.0 and I'm buying a mustang ho intake for $20. I'm looking at getting a set of ho heads and 1.7 rockers. So, here's a few questions. How are my valve clearences going to be? Too close? Will my compression change? Will it severely hurt my emissions? Will i have to modify the fuel system? Its a MAP system. Also, where can I find ho heads?I know I was able to find new reproduction pi heads for my 4.6 pretty easy. I would do mild a mild cam but I'm not sure I feel like going through all that hassle. Any and all information is super appreciated.
 
  #2  
Old 06-06-2013, 04:25 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,897
Likes: 0
Received 951 Likes on 755 Posts
Unfortunately you're almost totally wasting your time and money here, the '87+ Mustang 5.0 wears the exact same heads as the '87+ truck engine, and the HO intake is quite a bit smaller and more restrictive than the truck intake, so you would see more gains by just bolting 1.7 rockers on your truck motor as it is. The HO motor has a little bigger cam than the truck motor and you could swap one in but be aware all gains will be at upper rpms you won't see any gains below 2500rpm and may even lose some grunt, but that's the nature of the 5.0 and other cams produce similar results.
 
  #3  
Old 06-07-2013, 10:54 AM
Silvestris's Avatar
Silvestris
Silvestris is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So stick with just the rockers? What about the HO heads?
 
  #4  
Old 06-07-2013, 12:13 PM
Cobra-Kai's Avatar
Cobra-Kai
Cobra-Kai is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Peine, Germany
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Silvestris
What about the HO heads?
Conanski just said:

the '87+ Mustang 5.0 wears the exact same heads as the '87+ truck engine,
Means: You already have HO Heads installed.
 
  #5  
Old 06-07-2013, 01:23 PM
Silvestris's Avatar
Silvestris
Silvestris is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry. I'm at work and I kinda skimmed through the reply. Thanks for the info. Any other performance suggestions? I already have brand new ignition system, shorty headers, new cats, and cherry bomb. I think a CAI might hurt me more than help.
 
  #6  
Old 06-07-2013, 02:06 PM
Silvestris's Avatar
Silvestris
Silvestris is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And one more question. Are the rockers a shaft style, stud style, or pedestal style?
 
  #7  
Old 06-08-2013, 01:45 AM
Cobra-Kai's Avatar
Cobra-Kai
Cobra-Kai is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Peine, Germany
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't know if Ford has changed the rocker arm style between '89 and '95, but my '89 E150 302 has pedestral style rockers with 5/16 stud size
 
  #8  
Old 06-08-2013, 10:39 AM
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
baddad457 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: May 2003
Location: south louisiana
Posts: 11,122
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Silvestris
And one more question. Are the rockers a shaft style, stud style, or pedestal style?
Pedestal rockers. The difference in your 95's cam vs an HO roller is about ten degrees duration and .030 lift on the intake lobe. The exhaust lobe is the same lift and depending on where you find the duration specs, it's either the same or ten degrees. In short, there's not enough difference at all to justify opening up a running engine to swap in an HO cam when it's got the F4TE cam already. And as the others have pointed out, you've already got the HO heads.
 
  #9  
Old 06-08-2013, 01:24 PM
Silvestris's Avatar
Silvestris
Silvestris is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks a lot guys. This info is very much appreciated.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
broketruckjohn
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
09-02-2013 06:12 PM
1978300ford
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
5
11-01-2008 10:56 AM
franckybosnie
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
11
07-09-2007 09:41 AM
ckcn10
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
126
03-02-2007 12:20 AM
chris_567
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
37
11-04-2005 09:37 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Budget performance help



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:23 PM.