1984 F150 With a 302. - Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums



1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Early Eighties Bullnose Ford Truck

1984 F150 With a 302.

Reply
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 05-31-2013, 09:29 PM
Brando1988 Brando1988 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 10
Brando1988 is starting off with a positive reputation.
1984 F150 With a 302.

I recently bought a motor off of Craigslist. The Guy told me it was a 302. Came with a C-4 transfer too. Well after doing all the work on pulling the motor out of my truck I noticed a size difference. Apparently the motor he sold me is a 289... not a 302. The truck is an 84, the motor and transfer came out of a 74 mustang. I need suggestions on the installation of the 289 into my truck. Specifically the installation of the transmission as the OEM transfer in the truck will not bolt up to the 289. Any assistance would be appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-31-2013, 09:36 PM
Gary Lewis's Avatar
Gary Lewis Gary Lewis is online now
FTE Chapter Leader
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Northeast, OK
Posts: 28,565
Gary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant future
The 302 came out in 68 from what I read, so if it came out of a 74 it is a 302. But, when you say the "OEM transfer in the truck will not bolt up to the 289" I get confused. The transfer case bolts to the transmission and the transmission to the engine. And a C4 is a transmission, not a transfer case.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-31-2013, 09:43 PM
85e150six4mtod 85e150six4mtod is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 18,747
85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation
It came with a C4 transmission, right? Is that what you meant by "C4 transfer"?

You noticed a size difference? Externally? A post '65 289 is identical externally to a 302, with the only differences being accessory drives and maybe dipstick locations. Did you mean you checked the stroke while you were removing the engine?

"The motor and transfer came out of a '74 Mustang..." A '74 Mustang is a Mustang II. They were not equipped with V8s. The 302 was available in 1975. If a 289 came out of a Mustang II, regardless of year, it was a transplant. The last year for the 289 was 1968.

Your OEM "transfer". Are you now talking about the transfer case in your truck? If so, is it the type that bolts directly to the transmission? (referred to a "married") If so, it will not bolt to a car transmission. And the car transmission can not easily be converted to a 4x4 model, as a complete teardown and a replacement tailshaft and housing are required.

IF you have a 289, it would install exactly the same as a 302, as the blocks are the same--UNLESS it is an early '65 or older 289.

The transmission is a different issue.

Also, flywheel/flexplate balance changes in the early '80s, but we're not there yet.

Did you perhaps get a 2.8 V6 out of that '74 Mustang II, and that's the size difference you are noticing externally?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-31-2013, 11:29 PM
Brando1988 Brando1988 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 10
Brando1988 is starting off with a positive reputation.
My fault. Yes. I mean the OEM transmission. The size difference I am reffering to is the distance from head to head. It appeared to me that the 302 that I removed from my truck was wider than the alleged 302 that I bought. Upon further research I do notice a substantial difference in height, which makes sense given the information I was given by my father that the only difference in "size" is that the 302 has a longer stroke than a 289. I am unclear on the exact year of the 289. The number on it is hard to make out due to the age. My main concerns with the 289 set up is the differences in the transmissions. Specifically the shifter position and function and the cooling line connectors.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-31-2013, 11:34 PM
Brando1988 Brando1988 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 10
Brando1988 is starting off with a positive reputation.
I am counting 8 spark plugs total. The C-4. Transmission that came with the 289 is 1/2" shorter, (from the bell housing to the output shaft), than the motor installed (OEM) in the truck. I know the bolt patterns are dissimilar from the factory trans to the other trans.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-31-2013, 11:37 PM
Brando1988 Brando1988 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 10
Brando1988 is starting off with a positive reputation.
The motor mounts may be the same. I cannot tell yet. However the 289 has a 1" difference from head to head (looking at the water pump, then it is from left to right.) than the 302.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-01-2013, 12:41 AM
tbirdscott's Avatar
tbirdscott tbirdscott is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Willow River B.C.
Posts: 561
tbirdscott is starting off with a positive reputation.
Sounding more and more like you pulled a 351 out of your truck, not a 302.

289 - 302 head to head distance and all other exterior dimensions are exactly 100% the same. Internal differences are just the crank and rods. Only difference you will find is that some early 289 blocks had 5 bell housing bolts instead of the later 6.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-01-2013, 09:23 AM
Gary Lewis's Avatar
Gary Lewis Gary Lewis is online now
FTE Chapter Leader
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Northeast, OK
Posts: 28,565
Gary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant future
Quote:
Originally Posted by tbirdscott View Post
Sounding more and more like you pulled a 351 out of your truck, not a 302.

289 - 302 head to head distance and all other exterior dimensions are exactly 100% the same. Internal differences are just the crank and rods. Only difference you will find is that some early 289 blocks had 5 bell housing bolts instead of the later 6.
Amen. I'll bet you had a 351W in the truck, which is noticeably bigger than a 302. But you cannot tell a 289 from a 302 by measuring the external dimensions as they are identical.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-01-2013, 11:05 AM
Brando1988 Brando1988 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 10
Brando1988 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Can I get an idea on where tonfind the casting numbers so I can see if it is in fact a 351. On the front of the motor on the block beside the water pump i found a stainless steel plate glued to the block with the numbers 288994 stamped on it. Does this mean anything to anybody. I tried searching google about these numbers and could not find anything. As far as the casting numbers I am unsure where they would be located.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-01-2013, 11:10 AM
Brando1988 Brando1988 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 10
Brando1988 is starting off with a positive reputation.
I will say thatnif the motor i pulled out of my truck does turn out to be a 351 then it is getting bored, rebuilt, and reinstalled in my truck.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-01-2013, 11:19 AM
Brando1988 Brando1988 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 10
Brando1988 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Also on the back of the motor by the flywheel there is a small stamp that reads 7K2.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-01-2013, 11:21 AM
Gary Lewis's Avatar
Gary Lewis Gary Lewis is online now
FTE Chapter Leader
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Northeast, OK
Posts: 28,565
Gary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant future
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brando1988 View Post
I will say thatnif the motor i pulled out of my truck does turn out to be a 351 then it is getting bored, rebuilt, and reinstalled in my truck.
The 351W has more torque than a 302, all else being equal, due to its longer stroke. And torque, not horsepower, is king in a truck.

Yes, it is possible to build a 302 to have as much torque as a 351W, but it takes money to do so. And, a smaller chunk of money will get as much torque in the larger engine. They haven't, as yet, repealed the laws of physics which, loosely translated, say torque = stroke x force. So, given that the 302 and 351W have the same bore and, therefore, the same "force" if all else is equal, the longer stroke of the 351W gives more torque.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-01-2013, 11:46 AM
Brando1988 Brando1988 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 10
Brando1988 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Yea. And I take it that certain parts are interchangeable between the 302 and 351. Especially considering the fact that I have been buying parts for a 302 for the past 3 years and have never had a problem fitting them up. I just need to verify that this motor is in fact a 351.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-01-2013, 11:58 AM
Gary Lewis's Avatar
Gary Lewis Gary Lewis is online now
FTE Chapter Leader
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Northeast, OK
Posts: 28,565
Gary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant futureGary Lewis has a brilliant future
Measure across the intake manifold between the heads. A 351W measures about 11" and a 302 about 9".
Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
302 or 289 in my truck I'm not sure BigRobK 1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks 19 12-09-2015 06:44 AM
82 302 intake manifold str8sixman 1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 8 03-20-2015 10:20 PM
64 Ranchero w/c4 tranny JWHCMH Engine Swaps 10 08-31-2014 03:55 PM
Radiator size? benbuilder 1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks 3 04-22-2014 10:04 PM
Headers 302 289 Engine Branded 1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks 0 03-09-2014 07:56 PM


Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums >

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:06 AM.


This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.