Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Older, Classic & Antique Trucks > 1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 05-12-2013, 06:16 PM
Aus56's Avatar
Aus56 Aus56 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 393
Aus56 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.Aus56 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Does a 351 Cleveland fit well in a 56 F100 or is a 351 Windsor a better fit?

I presently have a 302 Windsor in my truck, my mechanic thinks it is a smog era engine. I am considering fitting a 351 for some extra grunt. I see a lot of you use Windsor engines and I understand they are more compact than Clevelands. I believe I have occasionally seen Cleveland engined trucks on here.

I met a hotrodder with a 351 Cleveland for sale for $2500 that sounds good. I was after a Windsor but wonder if it is a problem with fit. He has a 48 Ford sedan and he can't get extractors to fit. So this is a worry straight off for me.

Are they longer as well as wider?

The truck has a 74 Nova front end and Chev steering box, left hand drive.

Does anyone have experience with this situation, any Cleveland owners have a comment?

I look forward to your comments.
__________________
Neville
My old girl has the original look, which I do love. I would like to customise the body of my truck, but don't have the nerve to pull it apart for a significant custom rebuild. Long live the darkside and those with the courage to travel there.

Last edited by Aus56; 05-12-2013 at 06:27 PM. Reason: More info
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-12-2013, 07:12 PM
irondragon79's Avatar
irondragon79 irondragon79 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,392
irondragon79 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I'm putting a 351m (a 351c derivative) in my 52 F-3. I'll have to take some pictures of the engine bay, but I have a ton of room. One argument though of a Windsor over a Cleveland is that performance parts tend to be more common and inexpensive.
__________________
Jon
1952 F-3 Extended Cab
1948 F-1
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-12-2013, 07:23 PM
Aus56's Avatar
Aus56 Aus56 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 393
Aus56 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.Aus56 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Jon, thanks for your reply, I gather you mean there are more parts for Windsors available there. In Australia the Cleveland is considered higher than Windsors, some suggesting the Windsor is only good for a boat anchor. A great deal of Cleveland hot up stuff available here, and Windsor stuff is available also. I am concerned about fitting extractors as I don't seem to have a lot of room available now.

I am concerned if I had to shift the engine forward to fit, the new driveshaft I just had made up to fit my 8.8 rear end will be a problem for length. I guess once you change something there is always something else you have to worry about
__________________
Neville
My old girl has the original look, which I do love. I would like to customise the body of my truck, but don't have the nerve to pull it apart for a significant custom rebuild. Long live the darkside and those with the courage to travel there.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-12-2013, 07:26 PM
85e150six4mtod 85e150six4mtod is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 16,033
85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation
351m? Oh gosh, please make it warmed over 400. 137 horse is just not enough.....

The 351C actually has a slightly lower deck than the 351W. 9.206" for the C, 9.503" for later model W's. The 302 is 8.206".


(The 351M/400 is 10.297, almost as high as a 429/460.)

http://mustangsandmore.com/ubb/EngineDimensions.html

JMO, but if I had a smog era 302 but was otherwise happy with the installation, I'd beef it up, and consider a stroker for it. Can you get 302 parts any easier than 351w stuff?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-12-2013, 07:40 PM
irondragon79's Avatar
irondragon79 irondragon79 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,392
irondragon79 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 85e150six4mtod View Post
351m? Oh gosh, please make it warmed over 400. 137 horse is just not enough
my motor is pushing 300hp, and very close to the same in torque. I chose the 351m for its lower end, low rpm power range. Building a it for work truck, not speed. I do have a second motor and a 400 crank ready for a future project


Aus56 sorry didn't pay attention to your location when you posted. Yeah, I know the Cleveland engines are popular down your way, and I think size wise you could readily fit one in.

On a side note, as far as the Cleveland series of engines (351C and M, and the 400M) the Australian 351C v4 heads are the top of the line for performance building and bring a pretty penny here in the states.
__________________
Jon
1952 F-3 Extended Cab
1948 F-1
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-12-2013, 08:20 PM
Aus56's Avatar
Aus56 Aus56 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 393
Aus56 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.Aus56 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Thanks for your replies again fellas. Jon it is funny that the Clevelands get so much attention here and the Windsors in the US.

The Cleveland has a rich racing history here and it was in one of our most loved local muscle cars, the Falcon GT/GT HO, at the time the fastest four door in the world as we liked to say.

I am no hot car guru by any stretch, I would just like to have a good reasonably powerful motor to sound good and the pleasure of driving a powerful car, even if I don't need a street fighter. The sort of figures you are talking Jon would probably be great.

My old bus sounds OK and with the previous 3.92 gears was OK around town, but it would be great to have a good sounding/performing motor. I wouldn't expect to compete with the street monsters at the local Friday and Saturday night car meetings but still a nice note would be good.
__________________
Neville
My old girl has the original look, which I do love. I would like to customise the body of my truck, but don't have the nerve to pull it apart for a significant custom rebuild. Long live the darkside and those with the courage to travel there.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-12-2013, 08:21 PM
seaves46 seaves46 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: australia
Posts: 221
seaves46 is starting off with a positive reputation.
It should drop straight in using the same transmission and using the same engine mounts !
Only minor changes would be needed as in exhaust and rad hoses etc .
I would leave the Windsor in there if it's a good runner .
Just for the record I've had both engines fitted in my 53 when I had it and I now have a Windsor in the 56 i'm building and these engine bays have a ton of room . .
__________________
Scott

1956 f100
1933 ford pickup
1936 ford 3 window coupe
1947 ford club coupe
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-12-2013, 08:42 PM
Aus56's Avatar
Aus56 Aus56 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 393
Aus56 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.Aus56 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Thanks Scott I appreciate your experience with this situation. My engine does run ok but as a smog era engine doesn't have a lot of grunt. I would like some more power. I don't want to spend money on my motor as it seems that blokes pull out good motors to put in something else/ hotter etc.and their motor often goes cheap. I don't want to spend $8,000 on building a good motor IF I can get a good 2nd hand one that will do what I want and has good life left in it.

Thanks for the info about fit. So you have had no problem fitting extractors?
__________________
Neville
My old girl has the original look, which I do love. I would like to customise the body of my truck, but don't have the nerve to pull it apart for a significant custom rebuild. Long live the darkside and those with the courage to travel there.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-12-2013, 08:55 PM
seaves46 seaves46 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: australia
Posts: 221
seaves46 is starting off with a positive reputation.
No problem at all with the 53 , that had a worked 351 clevo in it with block hugger headers .
__________________
Scott

1956 f100
1933 ford pickup
1936 ford 3 window coupe
1947 ford club coupe
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-12-2013, 09:15 PM
Aarons54f100's Avatar
Aarons54f100 Aarons54f100 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 274
Aarons54f100 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I'm putting a Cleveland in my 54. I have had no issues with space yet. Long tube headers might be a pain to figure out. I have had no issues finding Cleveland parts on the internet either. At the shows is a different story...
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-12-2013, 09:37 PM
Aus56's Avatar
Aus56 Aus56 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 393
Aus56 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.Aus56 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Thanks Aaron and Scott for your help. One way or another I will get a good motor, Windsor or Cleveland, nice to know a Cleveland is a real contender for what I need as so much is available for them.

Aaron yes headers have worried me as I have seen some blokes tie their pipes up in knots just about to get clearance. I am assuming block hugger headers are not as effective as you don't have the long pipes to get the exhaust pulses equalised or is that not correct?
__________________
Neville
My old girl has the original look, which I do love. I would like to customise the body of my truck, but don't have the nerve to pull it apart for a significant custom rebuild. Long live the darkside and those with the courage to travel there.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-12-2013, 09:57 PM
Aarons54f100's Avatar
Aarons54f100 Aarons54f100 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 274
Aarons54f100 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Correct, shorty headers are not as effective but I would assume still a nice improvement over manifolds. As even still the collection area for the pipes is far enough away so that one piston isn't robbing another.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-12-2013, 10:44 PM
Aus56's Avatar
Aus56 Aus56 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 393
Aus56 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.Aus56 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Thanks Aaron, appreciate your comments. I have been a bystander all my life, now I am trying to get involved as well as I can. It's enjoyable, the forum is great from the advice, to the humorous posts and I look forward to getting my truck sorted. Looking for 17" mags and radial WWW's to suit, then finish some things off in the cab and somewhere along the way upgrade my engine.
__________________
Neville
My old girl has the original look, which I do love. I would like to customise the body of my truck, but don't have the nerve to pull it apart for a significant custom rebuild. Long live the darkside and those with the courage to travel there.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-13-2013, 07:29 AM
54TexasF100's Avatar
54TexasF100 54TexasF100 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: West Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 237
54TexasF100 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.54TexasF100 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Not sure if this helps but we all like pictures. My co-worker had a 351C in his 56 F-100.
Attached Images
  
__________________
Stephen
1954 F-100, 351W, 4 Speed Toploader w/Hurst, 9 inch (2.75) on Leafs, Aerostar IFS, 1970 Mustang 22 Gal
Build Thread-http://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/11...4-f-100-d.html
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-13-2013, 05:26 PM
Aus56's Avatar
Aus56 Aus56 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 393
Aus56 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.Aus56 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Stephen, thanks for the pictures, looks good, and seems to be a reasonable space on the left for pipes at least.

Cheers
__________________
Neville
My old girl has the original look, which I do love. I would like to customise the body of my truck, but don't have the nerve to pull it apart for a significant custom rebuild. Long live the darkside and those with the courage to travel there.
Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2013, 05:26 PM
 
 
 
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Older, Classic & Antique Trucks > 1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help Radiator Hose suit Cleveland! 86F350XLT4x4 1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 6 04-05-2014 04:44 AM
351 engine identification (Windsor, Cleveland, Modified) caleballen95 1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1 03-23-2014 04:18 PM
will a C6 off a 400m bolt to a 302? bullmoose11 1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks 27 08-29-2013 06:57 AM
What engine is in my truck? ol'blue77 1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks 21 01-14-2013 10:35 PM
351 Cleveland, Windsor, Modified ol'blue77 1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks 7 01-12-2013 08:19 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup