Rebuilding my 1950 F-2
#16
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Saskatoon SK Canada
Posts: 6,682
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
8 Posts
The problem with the 1997-2003 F-150 2WD suspension is:
1. The front track width is wider. 65.4" vs stock 58"
2. You would have to graft in the entire front frame section and it is also too wide. 39.5" vs stock front width of 32" (rear 34").
3. Metric wheel bolt pattern 5 x 135mm. This bolt pattern was only used 1997-2003 vs stock 8 x 6.5" 1948-present day or 5 x 5.5" 1940's-present day
4. Shouldn't be attempted unless your a well experienced fabricator.
It will be much easier and surprisingly cheaper to fix the stock suspension plus you will have it road worthy faster. It should be relatively easy to find a running 302/351W and you won't have deal with making it fit as its already equipped. The fuel injected engines just need an intake and distributor change to be carbureted.
1. The front track width is wider. 65.4" vs stock 58"
2. You would have to graft in the entire front frame section and it is also too wide. 39.5" vs stock front width of 32" (rear 34").
3. Metric wheel bolt pattern 5 x 135mm. This bolt pattern was only used 1997-2003 vs stock 8 x 6.5" 1948-present day or 5 x 5.5" 1940's-present day
4. Shouldn't be attempted unless your a well experienced fabricator.
It will be much easier and surprisingly cheaper to fix the stock suspension plus you will have it road worthy faster. It should be relatively easy to find a running 302/351W and you won't have deal with making it fit as its already equipped. The fuel injected engines just need an intake and distributor change to be carbureted.
#17
The problem with the 1997-2003 F-150 2WD suspension is:
1. The front track width is wider. 65.4" vs stock 58"
2. You would have to graft in the entire front frame section and it is also too wide. 39.5" vs stock front width of 32" (rear 34").
3. Metric wheel bolt pattern 5 x 135mm. This bolt pattern was only used 1997-2003 vs stock 8 x 6.5" 1948-present day or 5 x 5.5" 1940's-present day
4. Shouldn't be attempted unless your a well experienced fabricator.
It will be much easier and surprisingly cheaper to fix the stock suspension plus you will have it road worthy faster. It should be relatively easy to find a running 302/351W and you won't have deal with making it fit as its already equipped. The fuel injected engines just need an intake and distributor change to be carbureted.
1. The front track width is wider. 65.4" vs stock 58"
2. You would have to graft in the entire front frame section and it is also too wide. 39.5" vs stock front width of 32" (rear 34").
3. Metric wheel bolt pattern 5 x 135mm. This bolt pattern was only used 1997-2003 vs stock 8 x 6.5" 1948-present day or 5 x 5.5" 1940's-present day
4. Shouldn't be attempted unless your a well experienced fabricator.
It will be much easier and surprisingly cheaper to fix the stock suspension plus you will have it road worthy faster. It should be relatively easy to find a running 302/351W and you won't have deal with making it fit as its already equipped. The fuel injected engines just need an intake and distributor change to be carbureted.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scott2k
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
10
12-02-2018 04:33 PM
mike85120
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
12
04-28-2014 04:09 PM
Dano78
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
14
06-01-2011 11:09 PM
lvin4jc
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
20
06-22-2010 08:27 PM