5 cylinder Diesel in F150's Future? - Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums



2009 - 2014 F150 Discuss the 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 Ford F150

5 cylinder Diesel in F150's Future?

Reply
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 03-23-2013, 10:08 AM
PrinceValium's Avatar
PrinceValium PrinceValium is online now
Postmaster
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Northern California
Posts: 2,919
PrinceValium is a name known to allPrinceValium is a name known to allPrinceValium is a name known to allPrinceValium is a name known to allPrinceValium is a name known to allPrinceValium is a name known to all
5 cylinder Diesel in F150's Future?

I was surfing the web trying to read about the 2014 F150 this morning and came across this article of a 3.2L South African built diesel used in The Ford Escort in Europe. (197hp with 325 lbs. -ft. of torque) Would you buy a F150 with this motor in it? It boasts 60 mpg!

Here is the article:

Is a Five-Cylinder Diesel In Ford's F150 Future? - Farm Progress
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-23-2013, 10:11 AM
Explorer10 Explorer10 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1
Explorer10 is starting off with a positive reputation.
I'd certainly take a close look.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-23-2013, 10:25 AM
PrinceValium's Avatar
PrinceValium PrinceValium is online now
Postmaster
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Northern California
Posts: 2,919
PrinceValium is a name known to allPrinceValium is a name known to allPrinceValium is a name known to allPrinceValium is a name known to allPrinceValium is a name known to allPrinceValium is a name known to all
Quote:
Originally Posted by Explorer10 View Post
I'd certainly take a close look.
Welcome to FTE!

Interesting stuff huh?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-23-2013, 11:26 AM
parkland parkland is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,099
parkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud of
60 MPG in a car...
I think it would be in the high 20's in the f150.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-23-2013, 11:26 AM
Lead Head Lead Head is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 7,031
Lead Head is a name known to allLead Head is a name known to allLead Head is a name known to allLead Head is a name known to allLead Head is a name known to allLead Head is a name known to all
This is not the engine used in the European Escort, as the Escort used a 1.8L 90HP Diesel. Not to mention the Escort hasn't been sold for ~10 years now. You also cannot directly compare European fuel economy to EPA. European fuel economy numbers are usually inflated 205-40% compared to EPA.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-23-2013, 08:43 PM
2ndStroke's Avatar
2ndStroke 2ndStroke is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 9,243
2ndStroke has a superb reputation2ndStroke has a superb reputation2ndStroke has a superb reputation2ndStroke has a superb reputation2ndStroke has a superb reputation2ndStroke has a superb reputation2ndStroke has a superb reputation2ndStroke has a superb reputation2ndStroke has a superb reputation2ndStroke has a superb reputation2ndStroke has a superb reputation
That's the motor that may be used in the 2013 ford transit. It's also used in the global ford ranger. There was a sort article about it in the last issue of dieselpower. Can't see it being used in a small escort?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-23-2013, 11:59 PM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins tseekins is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 25,194
tseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputation
I think it could be a home run even though I wouldn't get it for myself. Diesel fuel is too high and maintenance along with initial cost is a show stopper for me.

I can't imagine Ford having 5 engines available in the F-150. Which engine would go?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-24-2013, 01:23 AM
blueovelboy's Avatar
blueovelboy blueovelboy is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: sunnyvale
Posts: 804
blueovelboy has a very good reputation on FTE.blueovelboy has a very good reputation on FTE.blueovelboy has a very good reputation on FTE.blueovelboy has a very good reputation on FTE.
ya i cant see them with 5 motor to chose from in a F150 so they would kill one of the V8 i bet! i would guess the 5.0 because the raptor needs a power house to rest on!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-24-2013, 03:09 AM
640 CI Aluminum FORD 640 CI Aluminum FORD is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,140
640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by blueovelboy View Post
ya i cant see them with 5 motor to chose from in a F150 so they would kill one of the V8 i bet! i would guess the 5.0 because the raptor needs a power house to rest on!
If it came to that, I would bet the 6.2L would be the one on the choping block. Its more of a niche engine. The 5.0L is Fords volume V8, Alot more trucks roll off the dealership lots with the 5.0L than they do with the 6.2L.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-24-2013, 06:10 AM
03 SVT VERT 03 SVT VERT is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 451
03 SVT VERT has a good reputation on FTE.03 SVT VERT has a good reputation on FTE.03 SVT VERT has a good reputation on FTE.
The 6.2 would definately be the engine cut from the lineup. The Ecoboost and 5.0l make up the overwhelming majority of sales. Not to mention the 6.2l is terrible for Ford's CAFE rating.

Dropping the 6.2l from the F150 has seen passing references from Ford execs quite a few times in the past. Not that long ago Ford wanted imput from consumers on whether they would consider buying an Ecoboost Raptor over the 6.2l.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-24-2013, 07:26 AM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins tseekins is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 25,194
tseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by 640 CI Aluminum FORD View Post
If it came to that, I would bet the 6.2L would be the one on the choping block. Its more of a niche engine. The 5.0L is Fords volume V8, Alot more trucks roll off the dealership lots with the 5.0L than they do with the 6.2L.
Fully agreed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 03 SVT VERT View Post
The 6.2 would definately be the engine cut from the lineup. The Ecoboost and 5.0l make up the overwhelming majority of sales. Not to mention the 6.2l is terrible for Ford's CAFE rating.

Dropping the 6.2l from the F150 has seen passing references from Ford execs quite a few times in the past. Not that long ago Ford wanted imput from consumers on whether they would consider buying an Ecoboost Raptor over the 6.2l.
Not surprising at all sir. However, I think that dropping it all together would be a mistake as well. If the decision were all mine to make, I would still offer it in the SVT, Harley and Limited trucks and I would make sure that the company made a huge profit on each sale as a result.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-24-2013, 09:40 AM
Lead Head Lead Head is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 7,031
Lead Head is a name known to allLead Head is a name known to allLead Head is a name known to allLead Head is a name known to allLead Head is a name known to allLead Head is a name known to all
Quote:
Originally Posted by tseekins View Post
I think it could be a home run even though I wouldn't get it for myself. Diesel fuel is too high and maintenance along with initial cost is a show stopper for me.

I can't imagine Ford having 5 engines available in the F-150. Which engine would go?
It's not like they haven't had 5 engines available in a single F-Series truck before.

In the F-250s, you used to be able to option them with a 4.9, 5.0, 5.8, 7.5 and a 7.3 Diesel. Actually 6 options if you include the Lightning 5.8.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-24-2013, 11:15 AM
parkland parkland is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,099
parkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lead Head View Post
It's not like they haven't had 5 engines available in a single F-Series truck before.

In the F-250s, you used to be able to option them with a 4.9, 5.0, 5.8, 7.5 and a 7.3 Diesel. Actually 6 options if you include the Lightning 5.8.
I thought the 460 and diesel were only f250 and up options?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-24-2013, 02:37 PM
Lead Head Lead Head is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 7,031
Lead Head is a name known to allLead Head is a name known to allLead Head is a name known to allLead Head is a name known to allLead Head is a name known to allLead Head is a name known to all
They were, but you could get an F-250 with all of those engine options.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-24-2013, 04:13 PM
parkland parkland is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,099
parkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud of
Fair enough, I believe you are right.
Here is my personal guess as to what will happen....
The 6.2 will be gone, I think it was only brought to market to phase out the v10.
I think the 5.0 will be changed a bit into a ecoboost type engine, as it has been pointed out that some of the castings have provisions for such use in the future.

So I think that the f150 options will be 3.7 v6, 3.5 ecoboost, or 5.0 ecoboost for the raptor.
Ford ditched the ranger, because they speculated the only people that bought them wanted low budget trucks, so I expect they will use the 3.7 a lot on XL models.
Then for the super duty line up, I bet either 6.7 diesel, or 5.0 ecoboost will be the options.


I could be wrong though.
In fact, most of the time, I am wrong.
Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Interesting Read from the front page DDT11 2017 Super Duty 3 11-04-2016 03:50 PM
diesel spy shots? Rickyrobert 2015+ F150 35 10-23-2016 10:36 PM
REVIEW 2015 Ford F-150 XLT 4X4 is the Future edtahaney 2015+ F150 6 03-26-2015 09:31 PM
Could we see a 4-Cylinder F-150? Ford-Trucks Editors 2009 - 2014 F150 42 09-27-2011 08:07 PM
New engine info....6.2, Ecoboost.... powerstroke72 2009 - 2014 F150 24 03-18-2010 11:53 AM


Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums >

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:01 PM.


This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.