1999 to 2016 Super Duty 1999 to 2016 Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty with diesel V8 and gas V8 and V10 engines
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Tire downsize?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-25-2013, 03:17 PM
ncon's Avatar
ncon
ncon is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Boston
Posts: 177
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Tire downsize?

Wanted some feedback on the idea of downsizing my stock 265/75/16 if reasonably safe, seeking to increase the stock 3.73 ratio some (and replace worn tires)for cheaper than swapping to 4.10's or 4.30's (x2 for 4x4).
I never realized how much bigger is better for load capacity until I started this track a couple weeks ago.

I have stock lariot package wheels 16x7 AL with 265/75/16E (123/120) and 31.5in circumference. Seeking the smallest load rane E tire that fits my wheel and find two choices: 245/75/16E (120/116)@ 1in smaller (I think was a stock option), and 225/75/16E (115/112) rating w/ 2in smaller diameter.

Also consider stock 265's are 8.1in wide, 225's are 7.1in...so this drops an inch from the overall axle width. I've heard strong feedback this is a very bad idea (the firestone / explorer thing all over again), but can find any science behind these warnings. I see huge box trucks and E350 vans running 225/75/16 (115/112) load range E tires.
?

Neil
 
  #2  
Old 02-25-2013, 05:08 PM
meborder's Avatar
meborder
meborder is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Sioux Falls Area
Posts: 6,171
Received 365 Likes on 260 Posts
a lot of dually chebbies run 215/85r16's
Tire Search Results
or
http://www.discounttiredirect.com/di...15&ar=85&rd=16

couldnt find the diameter off hand, but there are as small as i have seen for a LRE.

good luck.
(gonna look different, that's for sure)
 
  #3  
Old 02-25-2013, 06:29 PM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 25,426
Received 671 Likes on 440 Posts
This is an interesting question.

The reason smaller tires are bad for load capacity is because the weight is carried by the tire through your pressure acting on the surface area of the tire. To carry more weight at the same pressure requires more surface area touching the ground, and that happens through sidewall flex as more of the tread is touching the asphalt supporting the load. So when you make the tire narrower, you have to have a longer cross section of tread touching the road to support the same load, which causes more sidewall flex. That's why smaller tires aren't rated for as much weight.

Most LRE tires are rated for 80 PSI, and therefore the maximum load is calculated by figuring the maximum permitted deflection and how much weight will put the tire at that limit at the maximum pressure. For the BFG Commercial T/A 215/85R16 that's only 2,721 lbs per tire. If your truck is a diesel you would be close to that on your front axle running empty, because a crew cab diesel weighs about 5,000 lbs on the front axle. There would be a few hundred pounds of capacity left so I think it would be safe. The rear would be just over 2,000 lbs under max tire load, so you'd have to watch how much you loaded your truck down with.

BF Goodrich lists that tire as being compatible with rims between 5.5-7" wide, so you should be fine. It would be safe but would compromise the load capacity of the truck. If you're not snowplowing or hauling heavy things you should be fine with this size as long as they are properly inflated.

ON edit: The same BFG Commerical T/A in the stock size of 265/75R16 is rated for 3,415 lbs as a comparison. So you'd be losing ~1,400 lbs tire capacity on each axle.
 
  #4  
Old 02-25-2013, 07:50 PM
CuNmUdF250's Avatar
CuNmUdF250
CuNmUdF250 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,043
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
my chevy work van has 245/75/16 tires...I would`nt go any smaller on a super duty
 
  #5  
Old 02-25-2013, 08:05 PM
ncon's Avatar
ncon
ncon is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Boston
Posts: 177
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
thats kinda where I'm settling at...but still seeking the key reasoning

the 245/75/16E drops a 3.73 ratio to 31.5/30.5*3.73 = 3.85

a 225/75/16E drops my 3.73 gearing to 31.5/29.5*3.73 = 3.98

3.98 is closer to what i want, why i'm still holding out some hopes here.

NC
 
  #6  
Old 02-25-2013, 08:19 PM
CuNmUdF250's Avatar
CuNmUdF250
CuNmUdF250 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,043
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
What load ratings are you finding on the 225s ? I just don`t think it`s wise to be right at max loaded weight or even within a few hundred pounds at all times.Otherwise if the load ratings are cool I`d do the 225s but I`d be damn certain to maintain the air pressure.
 
  #7  
Old 02-25-2013, 09:13 PM
ncon's Avatar
ncon
ncon is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Boston
Posts: 177
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
all three sizes are load range E...however the bigger tire can take more load (rated for more weight). all take 80psi max pressure.
weight rating:
265 = 3400lbs
245 = 3000lbs
225 = 2700lbs

I should note I'm a 5.4 gasser, no plow, just tow a 6Klb boat / trailer occasionally short distances.

Also have 2in oversized spring in the front, f350 blocks in the rear.

NC
 
  #8  
Old 02-25-2013, 09:14 PM
jerem0621's Avatar
jerem0621
jerem0621 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
My Dually has 235/85R16E transforce currently. They look great on the truck.

When examining my payload and options sticker it said the truck came with 215/85r16's...

I went to pepboys and tirerack.com and they say that SuperDuties never came with 215/85r16's... Well, I have a sticker that proves otherwise. LOL

Seriously, I don't think I would go smaller than 235/85's on a superduty.
 
  #9  
Old 02-25-2013, 09:17 PM
jwsrules's Avatar
jwsrules
jwsrules is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi if you only hauling that much should be fine with the 225's half tons come with p rated tires and are rated to tow more then 6k. the total weight rating of tires is more then the truck is rated for so should be fine.
 
  #10  
Old 03-07-2013, 05:24 PM
ncon's Avatar
ncon
ncon is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Boston
Posts: 177
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
So I lucked out and found a cheap local set of commercial truck tires (steel belted sidewalls) off a box truck to test this out, slightly used LT225/75/16E commercial truck tires, Goodyear G949 RSA Armor MAX. Sidewalls are twice as thick as stock 265's, and weigh in about the same at 49lbs each.

Its not pretty, and handling is not as good as stock tires...but ride is as smooth as glass (highway tread), and the new gear ratio is AWESOME! Wow, biggest power increase I've had yet; over CAMs, Y-pipe, 90mm CAI, e-fan, tuning, etc.

I know its going to help fuel mileage (will calculate over the coming weeks) as I can now hold 45mpg in overdrive on inclines, while maintaining over 10+lbs of intake vacuum.

Man I screwed up by not getting 4.30 gears from the factory!! And of-coarse we are getting a snowstorm now. lol.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hambass
Excursion - King of SUVs
32
04-21-2017 08:37 PM
reptar0077
1999 to 2016 Super Duty
3
01-06-2016 08:55 PM
jefftb
Other; Brakes, Electrical, Hitches, Weight Distribution & CDL Discussion
1
07-06-2008 11:36 AM
foxracer800
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
7
03-12-2006 09:02 AM
PSD6litre40
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel
23
12-09-2004 02:38 PM



Quick Reply: Tire downsize?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:27 PM.