Notices
2009 - 2014 F150 Discuss the 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

Question for those with 3.5 Ecoboost

  #1  
Old 12-15-2012, 09:40 AM
dkean1's Avatar
dkean1
dkean1 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question for those with 3.5 Ecoboost

I have a 2006 F350 6.0 diesel. The biggest problem I ever had with this truck was with the turbo. I don't use the truck enough and the turbo gets rusty. I don't know if it's because it's a diesel or not being used enough. The dealer had to clean it twice.

Are the turbo's on the 3.5 the same or are they made different so they won't rust?

I'm going to trade in the F350 for a 2013 F150. Right now I'm leaning towards a 5.0 because I don't want to deal with the turbo rust. I won't be towing any more.
 
  #2  
Old 12-17-2012, 12:52 AM
swann79's Avatar
swann79
swann79 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kemmerer, Wyoming
Posts: 1,479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can't answer your question about the turbos. I think you would be happier with the 5.0 since you won't be towing anymore, but it all depends on your driving style. You have to stay out of the turbos to gain any mileage benefits from the EcoBoost. The 5.0 is proving to be pretty much equal in the fuel mileage department and you won't have to worry about turbos.
 
  #3  
Old 12-17-2012, 01:16 AM
mpally's Avatar
mpally
mpally is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by swann79
I can't answer your question about the turbos. I think you would be happier with the 5.0 since you won't be towing anymore, but it all depends on your driving style. You have to stay out of the turbos to gain any mileage benefits from the EcoBoost. The 5.0 is proving to be pretty much equal in the fuel mileage department and you won't have to worry about turbos.
That was the deciding factor for me as well. I don't tow, so I went with the 5.0. So far, it has been a great truck.
 
  #4  
Old 12-17-2012, 04:59 AM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
tseekins is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 38,125
Received 1,218 Likes on 801 Posts
Quite frankly, if I were to purchase a truck for commuting only and it got minimal use, I'd opt for the 3.7L. It gets superior sustained MPG's to any of the new engines, has gobs of power for a small engine and there is no upcharge as it's standard equipment on the lower tier models.
 
  #5  
Old 12-17-2012, 12:27 PM
mpally's Avatar
mpally
mpally is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tseekins
Quite frankly, if I were to purchase a truck for commuting only and it got minimal use, I'd opt for the 3.7L. It gets superior sustained MPG's to any of the new engines, has gobs of power for a small engine and there is no upcharge as it's standard equipment on the lower tier models.
Agreed, except for the impact on resale. It's kind of like the towing package. If you don't intend to tow, you don't need it. However, the guy buying it from you may want to tow. If you keep your trucks for a long period of time, then I wouldn't be as concerned with resale though.
 
  #6  
Old 12-17-2012, 01:39 PM
dkean1's Avatar
dkean1
dkean1 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seeing that I want a King Ranch it has to be the 5.0 or the 3.5. Also I worked for Ford from 1964 to 1975 I get the Z plan price. I priced out a King Ranch CC 4x4 3:55 locking rear 6.5 bed and the King Ranch Luxury Package. It came to $45,768.

On January 1 we make our last house payment. If I trade in my 06 dually and 32' fifth Wheel they might owe me money.
 
  #7  
Old 12-17-2012, 02:07 PM
BURNSTOUGHFORD's Avatar
BURNSTOUGHFORD
BURNSTOUGHFORD is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have never heard of turbos rusting. Something sounds fishy with the dealer cleaning a turbo to make an engine run correctly.
 
  #8  
Old 12-17-2012, 07:18 PM
efx4's Avatar
efx4
efx4 is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,058
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The turbo charger outer housing will surface rust no matter what, but rusting in the inside doesn't sound right, IMO, as there is oil inside the turbos.
 
  #9  
Old 12-18-2012, 05:58 AM
Rob.D's Avatar
Rob.D
Rob.D is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Cedar Springs,MI
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I also had an 06 F350 with the 6.0 PSD. Yes the variable vanes in the turbo will rust and stick. In the 6 years I owned the 6.0 the vanes stuck 3 times. The truck was a garage queen for the most part after I received a company vehicle. I traded the PSD for the ecoboost but it's my wifes daily driver. But I have no boubt the ecoboost would suffer the same variable vane sticking issues if it was a garage queen.
 
  #10  
Old 12-18-2012, 09:28 AM
tvsjr's Avatar
tvsjr
tvsjr is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The turbo isn't rusting... he's probably referring to carbon buildup/coking on the turbo vanes, thanks to someone's brilliant idea to recirculate sooty diesel exhaust gas back into the intake ahead of the turbo (EGR).

Don't hold any experiences with the 6.0 against turbo engines at large. The 6.0 was flawed from the start.
 
  #11  
Old 12-18-2012, 09:54 AM
BURNSTOUGHFORD's Avatar
BURNSTOUGHFORD
BURNSTOUGHFORD is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If that is the case then no. The EGR will be after the turbos.
 
  #12  
Old 12-20-2012, 07:12 PM
capn kirk's Avatar
capn kirk
capn kirk is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,118
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I got the ecoboost, cant say enough about it, we have the 5.0 in some of our trucks its also a great motor, but I'm really glad I got the ecoboost otherwise I'd be kicking myself now wishing I had
 
  #13  
Old 12-20-2012, 09:11 PM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
tseekins is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 38,125
Received 1,218 Likes on 801 Posts
If Ford were to follow suit with Ram and develop an 8 speed tranny, I'd be very interested to see what kind of MPG's the EB could achieve.
 
  #14  
Old 12-20-2012, 11:29 PM
j.grif's Avatar
j.grif
j.grif is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: plymouth mi
Posts: 730
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by Rob.D
I also had an 06 F350 with the 6.0 PSD. Yes the variable vanes in the turbo will rust and stick. In the 6 years I owned the 6.0 the vanes stuck 3 times. The truck was a garage queen for the most part after I received a company vehicle. I traded the PSD for the ecoboost but it's my wifes daily driver. But I have no boubt the ecoboost would suffer the same variable vane sticking issues if it was a garage queen.
I may be wrong but I think the turbos on the ecoboost are fixed pitch vanes, I work in a trucking company and we see more trouble with the variable vane setups than with the fixed pitch jobs egr or not, egr on a long haul or city truck is just wrong. on the old school turbo setups we very rarely see any problems with the turbos and we are a no idle company, so in many cases the drivers are shutting them off hot, our company tolerates no amount of idle time! but what we save in fuel wasted with the engines idle versus starter battery and alternator problems is miniscule at best.
 
  #15  
Old 12-21-2012, 12:34 AM
Jus2shy's Avatar
Jus2shy
Jus2shy is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The ecoboost engine utilizes a fixed-geometry turbo. So no nozzles or adjustable vanes are on this turbo. All it has is an old-school integrated wastegate. Those seldom ever cause any real issues. The ecoboost turbo's are very simple in regards to modern turbochargers, only thing to watch for is if coolant somehow makes it into the turbo since it is a water-jacketed unit. But that kind of failure is extremely rare.
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Question for those with 3.5 Ecoboost



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:47 AM.