Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Newer Light Duty Trucks > 2009+ F150
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


2009+ F150 Discuss the 2009 through 2014 Ford F150 SPONSORED BY:

Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 12-15-2012, 09:40 AM
dkean1 dkean1 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 12
dkean1 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Question for those with 3.5 Ecoboost

I have a 2006 F350 6.0 diesel. The biggest problem I ever had with this truck was with the turbo. I don't use the truck enough and the turbo gets rusty. I don't know if it's because it's a diesel or not being used enough. The dealer had to clean it twice.

Are the turbo's on the 3.5 the same or are they made different so they won't rust?

I'm going to trade in the F350 for a 2013 F150. Right now I'm leaning towards a 5.0 because I don't want to deal with the turbo rust. I won't be towing any more.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-17-2012, 12:52 AM
swann79's Avatar
swann79 swann79 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Riverton, Wyoming
Posts: 1,479
swann79 has a very good reputation on FTE.swann79 has a very good reputation on FTE.swann79 has a very good reputation on FTE.
swannsa
I can't answer your question about the turbos. I think you would be happier with the 5.0 since you won't be towing anymore, but it all depends on your driving style. You have to stay out of the turbos to gain any mileage benefits from the EcoBoost. The 5.0 is proving to be pretty much equal in the fuel mileage department and you won't have to worry about turbos.
__________________
'12 F-150 4x4 XLT SuperCrew, EcoBoost, Max Tow
'66 F-250 4x4 short bed, 390, 4-sp. *FOR SALE*
'94 Bronco XLT, 5.8, Auto
'07 Foose Stallion (Mustang GT)

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-17-2012, 01:16 AM
mpally mpally is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 110
mpally is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by swann79 View Post
I can't answer your question about the turbos. I think you would be happier with the 5.0 since you won't be towing anymore, but it all depends on your driving style. You have to stay out of the turbos to gain any mileage benefits from the EcoBoost. The 5.0 is proving to be pretty much equal in the fuel mileage department and you won't have to worry about turbos.
That was the deciding factor for me as well. I don't tow, so I went with the 5.0. So far, it has been a great truck.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-17-2012, 04:59 AM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins tseekins is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hampton, Virginia
Posts: 19,277
tseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputation
Quite frankly, if I were to purchase a truck for commuting only and it got minimal use, I'd opt for the 3.7L. It gets superior sustained MPG's to any of the new engines, has gobs of power for a small engine and there is no upcharge as it's standard equipment on the lower tier models.
__________________
Tim
SCPO United States Coast Guard Retired
2011 F-150 XLT 4x4 Ecoboost
2010 Ford Focus
2004 Expedition XLT 4x2

FTE Guidelines
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-17-2012, 12:27 PM
mpally mpally is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 110
mpally is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tseekins View Post
Quite frankly, if I were to purchase a truck for commuting only and it got minimal use, I'd opt for the 3.7L. It gets superior sustained MPG's to any of the new engines, has gobs of power for a small engine and there is no upcharge as it's standard equipment on the lower tier models.
Agreed, except for the impact on resale. It's kind of like the towing package. If you don't intend to tow, you don't need it. However, the guy buying it from you may want to tow. If you keep your trucks for a long period of time, then I wouldn't be as concerned with resale though.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-17-2012, 01:39 PM
dkean1 dkean1 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 12
dkean1 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Seeing that I want a King Ranch it has to be the 5.0 or the 3.5. Also I worked for Ford from 1964 to 1975 I get the Z plan price. I priced out a King Ranch CC 4x4 3:55 locking rear 6.5 bed and the King Ranch Luxury Package. It came to $45,768.

On January 1 we make our last house payment. If I trade in my 06 dually and 32' fifth Wheel they might owe me money.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-17-2012, 02:07 PM
BURNSTOUGHFORD's Avatar
BURNSTOUGHFORD BURNSTOUGHFORD is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,483
BURNSTOUGHFORD has a good reputation on FTE.BURNSTOUGHFORD has a good reputation on FTE.
I have never heard of turbos rusting. Something sounds fishy with the dealer cleaning a turbo to make an engine run correctly.
__________________
2012 F-150 SCREW 3.5TT FX4 3.73
2010 Taurus SEL
1999 F-150 SCAB 5.4l Lots of Mods
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-17-2012, 07:18 PM
efx4's Avatar
efx4 efx4 is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 981
efx4 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
The turbo charger outer housing will surface rust no matter what, but rusting in the inside doesn't sound right, IMO, as there is oil inside the turbos.
__________________
2013 Keystone Outback 33' Travel Trailer
2013 F-150 Max Tow Ecoboost Lariat
2014 Ford Fusion SE Ecoboost
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-18-2012, 05:58 AM
Rob.D's Avatar
Rob.D Rob.D is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Cedar Springs,MI
Posts: 739
Rob.D is starting off with a positive reputation.
I also had an 06 F350 with the 6.0 PSD. Yes the variable vanes in the turbo will rust and stick. In the 6 years I owned the 6.0 the vanes stuck 3 times. The truck was a garage queen for the most part after I received a company vehicle. I traded the PSD for the ecoboost but it's my wifes daily driver. But I have no boubt the ecoboost would suffer the same variable vane sticking issues if it was a garage queen.
__________________
2013 Ford Screw Platinum 4x4, Off Road, Ecoboost, Ruby Red Metallic, Max Tow, 3.73 E-Locker, ARE Z, RAS, 5* Tuning.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-18-2012, 09:28 AM
tvsjr tvsjr is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,932
tvsjr has a great reputation on FTE.tvsjr has a great reputation on FTE.tvsjr has a great reputation on FTE.tvsjr has a great reputation on FTE.
The turbo isn't rusting... he's probably referring to carbon buildup/coking on the turbo vanes, thanks to someone's brilliant idea to recirculate sooty diesel exhaust gas back into the intake ahead of the turbo (EGR).

Don't hold any experiences with the 6.0 against turbo engines at large. The 6.0 was flawed from the start.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-18-2012, 09:54 AM
BURNSTOUGHFORD's Avatar
BURNSTOUGHFORD BURNSTOUGHFORD is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,483
BURNSTOUGHFORD has a good reputation on FTE.BURNSTOUGHFORD has a good reputation on FTE.
If that is the case then no. The EGR will be after the turbos.
__________________
2012 F-150 SCREW 3.5TT FX4 3.73
2010 Taurus SEL
1999 F-150 SCAB 5.4l Lots of Mods
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-20-2012, 07:12 PM
capn kirk capn kirk is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,106
capn kirk is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I got the ecoboost, cant say enough about it, we have the 5.0 in some of our trucks its also a great motor, but I'm really glad I got the ecoboost otherwise I'd be kicking myself now wishing I had
__________________
2011 F150 xlt ecoboost 4x4 screw 6.5bed added Firestone Ride-Rite airbags w/ hd compressor
Sold-1996 F-250 460 Super Cab 8' Bed 4x4 [/B]
3.73 limited slip frnt/rear, 35x12.50 BFG All-Terrain, 4" Skyjacker, 3" body lift, hedman headers 3" single-back turndown before rear axle, K&N Air Filter,rebuilt trans, deep trans pan, Warn manual hubs
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-20-2012, 09:11 PM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins tseekins is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hampton, Virginia
Posts: 19,277
tseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputation
If Ford were to follow suit with Ram and develop an 8 speed tranny, I'd be very interested to see what kind of MPG's the EB could achieve.
__________________
Tim
SCPO United States Coast Guard Retired
2011 F-150 XLT 4x4 Ecoboost
2010 Ford Focus
2004 Expedition XLT 4x2

FTE Guidelines
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-20-2012, 11:29 PM
j.grif's Avatar
j.grif j.grif is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: plymouth mi
Posts: 314
j.grif is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.j.grif is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.D View Post
I also had an 06 F350 with the 6.0 PSD. Yes the variable vanes in the turbo will rust and stick. In the 6 years I owned the 6.0 the vanes stuck 3 times. The truck was a garage queen for the most part after I received a company vehicle. I traded the PSD for the ecoboost but it's my wifes daily driver. But I have no boubt the ecoboost would suffer the same variable vane sticking issues if it was a garage queen.
I may be wrong but I think the turbos on the ecoboost are fixed pitch vanes, I work in a trucking company and we see more trouble with the variable vane setups than with the fixed pitch jobs egr or not, egr on a long haul or city truck is just wrong. on the old school turbo setups we very rarely see any problems with the turbos and we are a no idle company, so in many cases the drivers are shutting them off hot, our company tolerates no amount of idle time! but what we save in fuel wasted with the engines idle versus starter battery and alternator problems is miniscule at best.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-21-2012, 12:34 AM
Jus2shy Jus2shy is online now
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 423
Jus2shy has a great reputation on FTE.Jus2shy has a great reputation on FTE.Jus2shy has a great reputation on FTE.Jus2shy has a great reputation on FTE.
The ecoboost engine utilizes a fixed-geometry turbo. So no nozzles or adjustable vanes are on this turbo. All it has is an old-school integrated wastegate. Those seldom ever cause any real issues. The ecoboost turbo's are very simple in regards to modern turbochargers, only thing to watch for is if coolant somehow makes it into the turbo since it is a water-jacketed unit. But that kind of failure is extremely rare.
__________________
Currently: 2013 RAM 3500 Crew Cab Short Box (a different 6.7 I suppose)
Used to Own: 2010 Ford F-150 Supercrew FX4


Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2012, 12:34 AM
 
 
 
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Newer Light Duty Trucks > 2009+ F150

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1994 7.3 IDI Non Turbo Won't start jblueep Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L) 53 02-16-2014 07:05 PM
460 vs 7.3 turbo diesel WCSf350 1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 96 01-29-2014 08:20 PM
460 vs 7.3 turbo diesel questions WCSf350 Big Block V8 - 385 Series (6.1/370, 7.0/429, 7.5/460) 4 01-25-2014 11:52 AM
Turbo v10 E350 moosey78 1968-2013 Full Size Vans 26 08-13-2013 12:11 AM
Appropriate Portable Battery Jumper for Diesels? Chief-e9 Super Duty & Heavy Duty 8 05-27-2013 10:12 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup