1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Bumpsides Ford Truck

Carb For my 1971 Ranger XLT?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 11-04-2012, 04:38 AM
Corkwheats's Avatar
Corkwheats
Corkwheats is offline
Mountain Pass
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: U.P. Of Michigan
Posts: 144
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Carb For my 1971 Ranger XLT?

Hi Guys,

Well, I'm having loads of fun hunting down items to pep up my 1971 Ford Pickup (360). One of the things I want to do is put on an aluminum high rise intake & 4 BBL Carb.

There's a guy nearby me that has a Motorcraft 750 4 BBL that was running fine, and just came off a Ford 460 V-8. I can get it for $50. Does that sound like a good fit? Thanks for any help. I really appreciate it.

Bob
 
  #2  
Old 11-04-2012, 06:18 AM
jowilker's Avatar
jowilker
jowilker is offline
Fleet Owner

Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Creedmoor, North Carolina
Posts: 24,552
Received 46 Likes on 44 Posts
Hi Bob, Welcome to FTE & the BUMP forum.

No sir, DO NOT buy either. The 360 is an early emissions engine, while it is still a horse, it is considered a dog by many. About 600 cfms is all that engine can handle and it can handle it well. It is a pulling engine not a hi revving race engine.

Suggest you start on a plan to rebuild one day, using 390 crank & rods, Edelbrock Performer or similar intake, add headers, a RV cam and you can have that big horse.



John
 
  #3  
Old 11-04-2012, 07:11 AM
Corkwheats's Avatar
Corkwheats
Corkwheats is offline
Mountain Pass
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: U.P. Of Michigan
Posts: 144
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jowilker
Hi Bob, Welcome to FTE & the BUMP forum.

No sir, DO NOT buy either. The 360 is an early emissions engine, while it is still a horse, it is considered a dog by many. About 600 cfms is all that engine can handle and it can handle it well. It is a pulling engine not a hi revving race engine.

Suggest you start on a plan to rebuild one day, using 390 crank & rods, Edelbrock Performer or similar intake, add headers, a RV cam and you can have that big horse.



John
Thank you very, very much! I had been looking around, and researching this. It's great to hear from somebody who knows. I actually found a guy online who sells rebuilt carbs and has a Holley 600 CFM (Model 4160 w/ Ford auto trans kickdown) that sounded like a good fit. And....I found some stock 360 4 BBL intake manifolds that were removed from 360's. Maybe I'll go that route!

Bob
 
  #4  
Old 11-04-2012, 07:45 AM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 88,826
Received 648 Likes on 543 Posts
Originally Posted by Corkwheats
I found some stock 360 4BBL intake manifolds.
There's no such thing as a 360 4V intake manifold. 360's were only installed in 1968/76 F100/350's and all came with 2 barrel carburetors.

1965/71 390 4V Passenger Car intake manifolds will bolt right on 360's, as will 1974/76 F100/350 390 4V intake manifolds. But, these manifolds are cast iron, just like your 2V manifold, weigh a ton.

Try reachin' over the grille or fender to remove one a these manifolds by yourself. Not an easy nor a pleasant experience.

What you might have found is some 1973/78 361 4V cast iron intake manifolds. PASS, you don't want any! The 361 is an FT engine, only installed in 500 and larger trucks.

360/390's share the same engine block, the bore (4.05") is the same. The stroke is different: 360: 3.50" / 390: 3.78"

All that's necessary to convert a 360 to a 390 is the 390's crank, rods, pistons and rings. EVERYTHING else is the same.
 
  #5  
Old 11-04-2012, 08:08 AM
Corkwheats's Avatar
Corkwheats
Corkwheats is offline
Mountain Pass
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: U.P. Of Michigan
Posts: 144
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NumberDummy
There's no such thing as a 360 4V intake manifold. 360's were only installed in 1968/76 F100/350's and all came with 2 barrel carburetors.

1965/71 390 4V Passenger Car intake manifolds will bolt right on 360's, as will 1974/76 F100/350 390 4V intake manifolds. But, these manifolds are cast iron, just like your 2V manifold, weigh a ton.

Try reachin' over the grille or fender to remove one a these manifolds by yourself. Not an easy nor a pleasant experience.

What you might have found is some 1973/78 361 4V cast iron intake manifolds. PASS, you don't want any! The 361 is an FT engine, only installed in 500 and larger trucks.
Thanks for your insight/correction. My bad. What I was viewing did not say it was from a 360. It was, however, from a Ford FE Engine that would fit a 360.

Is it your opinion that an aluminum intake, such as an Edelbrock Performer, etc., manifold would be better? Just as long as I don't "over-carb" it, and stick with a 600 CFM?

Thanks,
Bob
 
  #6  
Old 11-04-2012, 08:17 AM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 88,826
Received 648 Likes on 543 Posts
Originally Posted by Corkwheats
Thanks for your insight/correction. My bad. What I was viewing did not say it was from a 360. It was, however, from a Ford FE Engine that would fit a 360.

Is it your opinion that an aluminum intake, such as an Edelbrock Performer, etc., manifold would be better?
Absolutely, why mess with a cast iron manifold if you don't have to.

Just because it's an FE engine doesn't mean the parts will interchange. 1958/64 FE engines were only installed in Passenger Cars, have rounded valve covers without holes in them for oil cap/smog valve.

Have an oil fill tube on the right (passenger) side front of the engine. The bolt pattern on the block for the right/left steel/rubber insulators is different than 1965/71 FE engines.

The flywheel has 148 teeth, 1965/76 has 184 teeth. Three different 1958/64 FE waterpumps, none are the same as 1965/76 that use one waterpump. And the list goes on and on.

btw: Do you think your friend at the local shop that 'verified' the "14,000 actual" miles would know some/all of this jazz? Probably not.

I know your truck pretty well as I bought a 1971 Ranger XLT 390/C6 brand new, was a Ford partsman for 35 years (1962/97) and have been in this hobby since Ike was prez.
 
  #7  
Old 11-04-2012, 09:40 AM
Corkwheats's Avatar
Corkwheats
Corkwheats is offline
Mountain Pass
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: U.P. Of Michigan
Posts: 144
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NumberDummy
Absolutely, why mess with a cast iron manifold if you don't have to.

Just because it's an FE engine doesn't mean the parts will interchange. 1958/64 FE engines were only installed in Passenger Cars, have rounded valve covers without holes in them for oil cap/smog valve.

Have an oil fill tube on the right (passenger) side front of the engine. The bolt pattern on the block for the right/left steel/rubber insulators is different than 1965/71 FE engines.

The flywheel has 148 teeth, 1965/76 has 184 teeth. Three different 1958/64 FE waterpumps, none are the same as 1965/76 that use one waterpump. And the list goes on and on.

btw: Do you think your friend at the local shop that 'verified' the "14,000 actual" miles would know some/all of this jazz? Probably not.

I know your truck pretty well as I bought a 1971 Ranger XLT 390/C6 brand new, was a Ford partsman for 35 years (1962/97) and have been in this hobby since Ike was prez.
Thanks so much. I appreciate it. By the way, my friend at the shop actually does know all this stuff - when I first was going to get it, he began telling me all about the Fords, FE Engines, etc.

I'm the dummy here - just trying to learn some of this on my own. I don't plan on trying to make a hot rod out of this truck. I just want to have some fun, and boost it a bit in an "old school" sort of way.

I haven't messed around with cars since I was a kid. My first ever vehicle was a 1964 Ford Fairlane w/260 V8, 4 BBL, 4 Speed. The man who gave me the $ to buy this truck used to have a 1968 Ford Torino GT Fastback with a hot 390 in it (from the factory!). He currently has a cherry 1974 F100 w/360.

So, I just really appreciate all the expert info from you guys. I'll take all I can get! Thanks!

Bob
 
  #8  
Old 11-04-2012, 09:49 AM
Big_Foot's Avatar
Big_Foot
Big_Foot is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Chimacum, WA
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I put one of these Holley 2300 Street performers on my 390 recently, Love it! Was extremely easy to tune right out of the box and seems to be a great match for the truck, Its pretty much a bolt on and go carb.
AND best part, you keep your stock 2bbl intake manifold.

Holley 0-4412S Holley 2300 Street 2-Barrel Carburetors & Kits
 
  #9  
Old 11-04-2012, 04:26 PM
jowilker's Avatar
jowilker
jowilker is offline
Fleet Owner

Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Creedmoor, North Carolina
Posts: 24,552
Received 46 Likes on 44 Posts
Originally Posted by Corkwheats
Is it your opinion that an aluminum intake, such as an Edelbrock Performer, etc., manifold would be better? Just as long as I don't "over-carb" it, and stick with a 600 CFM?

Thanks,
Bob
Bob, The performer is a decent intake for your 360. But as posted earlier don't add anything like that until you rebuild it with more compression. You will be wasting your time.


John
 
  #10  
Old 11-04-2012, 06:32 PM
Corkwheats's Avatar
Corkwheats
Corkwheats is offline
Mountain Pass
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: U.P. Of Michigan
Posts: 144
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jowilker
Bob, The performer is a decent intake for your 360. But as posted earlier don't add anything like that until you rebuild it with more compression. You will be wasting your time.


John
Thanks John,

I have pretty much settled on that - My plan is to get a Professionally Rebuilt Holley 600 CFM (Model 4160 - $215) with a stock 4 Barrel Intake manifold that I can get for about $50 - $75.

Like you say - I'm not building a street rod. Just pumping it up a tad. Basically, it's going to be used to haul hay. I just want to have a little fun. I have a local guy who is going to put on a quality low restriction dual exhaust w glasspaks, as well. I'm not sticking a cam, etc., into this puppy.

Thanks for the info!

Bob
 
  #11  
Old 11-05-2012, 05:54 AM
Corkwheats's Avatar
Corkwheats
Corkwheats is offline
Mountain Pass
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: U.P. Of Michigan
Posts: 144
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Guys,

I'm planning on going with a Holley 600 CFM Carb (Model 4160). I don't need any more than that. Can anyone tell me what the "Ford Kickdown" on this carb is? Is that important? And, do I need electric choke or manual?

One last question - I'm looking at some stock used 4 BBL FE intake manifolds for my 360. In another thread, there was a discussion about the "S" manifolds vs. the "T" manifolds. I'm guessing there will be a big S or T that I'll be able to see. Which one would be best for my 360?

Thank you all so much!
Bob
 
  #12  
Old 11-05-2012, 03:59 PM
jowilker's Avatar
jowilker
jowilker is offline
Fleet Owner

Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Creedmoor, North Carolina
Posts: 24,552
Received 46 Likes on 44 Posts
Look at Bob's page of intakes, the dark blues are T & S FE Factory Intake Manifolds




John
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dilmachender
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
07-24-2014 05:36 AM
76HighboyGuy
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
24
07-17-2010 04:32 PM
Big Skier
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
18
03-31-2008 08:07 PM
YoungMT Hick
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
16
03-18-2007 12:05 PM
Damon Dimick
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
2
06-13-2003 07:05 PM



Quick Reply: Carb For my 1971 Ranger XLT?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:57 PM.