mustang 302 and f150 302 ?'s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-26-2012, 11:28 PM
extcab 95flareside's Avatar
extcab 95flareside
extcab 95flareside is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: spring Texas
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mustang 302 and f150 302 ?'s

I have a 95 f150 and it has a 5.0 what would fit on it and whats the difference? Pleas help
 
  #2  
Old 09-27-2012, 08:11 AM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,898
Likes: 0
Received 951 Likes on 755 Posts
I listed the differences in your other thread. The only part worth swapping IMO is the cam but if you're going through all that trouble you'll see more gains with an aftermarket cam.
 
  #3  
Old 09-27-2012, 10:49 AM
extcab 95flareside's Avatar
extcab 95flareside
extcab 95flareside is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: spring Texas
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
alright thank you. Does any one make a good intake for less than the edelbrock one for about $600?. I'v herd that people use the gt40 intake and have alo herd about the trick flow intake
 
  #4  
Old 09-27-2012, 12:53 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,898
Likes: 0
Received 951 Likes on 755 Posts
The truck intake is not restricting the motor at all it actually matches the Edelbrock and can be easily ported to exceed it, and all of these are capable of feeding an engine making upwards of 350hp. If you're looking for more power change the cam and replace the complete exhaust system with headers and an aftermarket single or dual setup, those are the components that are holding it back.
 
  #5  
Old 09-27-2012, 01:00 PM
extcab 95flareside's Avatar
extcab 95flareside
extcab 95flareside is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: spring Texas
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok thank-you for all the help.and just wondering witch are better long tube or short tube headers
 
  #6  
Old 09-27-2012, 01:08 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,898
Likes: 0
Received 951 Likes on 755 Posts
Longtubes will produce more gains at lower rpms so they're arguably better suited to truck applications, but shorties will also produce gains across the board from stock when paired with a complete free flowing aftermarket exhaust system, the stock manifolds and Y-pipe n cats are well known to be rather restrictive.
 
  #7  
Old 09-27-2012, 01:22 PM
extcab 95flareside's Avatar
extcab 95flareside
extcab 95flareside is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: spring Texas
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok well thank you very much for all the info on everything. You saved me alot of money with the info on the intake
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
factory594x4
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
3
01-30-2011 12:15 PM
Dearborn-1979-mudder
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
6
04-27-2009 07:24 PM
302 F-150
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
3
06-12-2007 08:29 AM
Ford347
Performance & General Engine Building
15
06-06-2007 10:11 PM
D351W
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
1
11-19-2004 06:45 AM



Quick Reply: mustang 302 and f150 302 ?'s



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:33 PM.