Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

easiest bolt-on traction bars for 92 f150

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 09-23-2012, 12:56 PM
GNR22's Avatar
GNR22
GNR22 is offline
Fabri-cobbler
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Central Wisconsin
Posts: 4,163
Received 515 Likes on 340 Posts
Your drawing is completely biased. In order for that top picture to be true, you made that top side bar out of elastic..
 
  #17  
Old 09-23-2012, 01:19 PM
danr1's Avatar
danr1
danr1 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sand Lake, MI
Posts: 5,670
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
The arrows in the drawings only illustrate load direction. Not suggesting anything as elastic.

The bars location above or below the axle isn't what makes the difference, its how its attached at the axle end.

The bar in the first drawing utilizes a pivot point at both ends, second image uses a solid connection, no provision to allow for pivot at the rear most end. That is what completely eliminates axles ability to rotate "ladder bar".

If it used that same pivoting connection as the top link at its axle end? it would do no more to prevent wrap then the top link.
 
  #18  
Old 09-23-2012, 01:31 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is online now
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,925
Likes: 0
Received 962 Likes on 762 Posts
Originally Posted by Lead Head
A bar on the bottom puts the spring under tension when the pinion starts to climb and is far more effective.
I have to disagree with that the under mounted snubber style bars are not any more effective...seen lots of old cars with them producing all kinds of wheel hop at the drag strip. If the springs are soft enough to bend into an S shape they're gonna do it regardless what type bolt-on trac-bar is used so like you and I both said the full solution would be beefier springs and traction bars or something that involves welding like ladder bars or a complete linked rear axle setup.
 
  #19  
Old 09-23-2012, 01:35 PM
Lead Head's Avatar
Lead Head
Lead Head is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 7,867
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by danr1
The bars location above or below the axle isn't what makes the difference, its how its attached at the axle end.

The bar in the first drawing utilizes a pivot point at both ends, second image uses a solid connection, no provision to allow for pivot at the rear most end. That is what completely eliminates axles ability to rotate "ladder bar".

If it used that same pivoting connection as the top link at its axle end? it would do no more to prevent wrap then the top link.
Incorrect, they both are allowed to pivot on both ends. It's where the rod is located on the axle that makes the difference.

Rod on top: Pinion begins to climb the ring gear and twist the axle back, the traction bar gets put under tension, which causes the front of the spring to be put under compression. This compression causes the spring to bend up into an S shape.

Rod on bottom: Pinion begins to climb ring gear and twist the axle back, the traction bar gets put under compression, which causes the spring to be put under tension (the exact opposite of the bar on top). This "tightens" the spring -making it seem stronger then it really is. It forms a kind of triangulation which prevents the axle from turning.

The single rod on bottom can still wrap under the right conditions. You need a dual bar (ladder bar), or a full linked suspension to eliminate axle wrap completely.

Go read the article I linked, or even search around some off-road and truck pulling forums. Single bars on top do not work.
Originally Posted by Conanski
I have to disagree with that the under mounted snubber style bars are not any more effective...seen lots of old cars with them producing all kinds of wheel hop at the drag strip. If the springs are soft enough to bend into an S shape they're gonna do it regardless what type bolt-on trac-bar is used so like you and I both said the full solution would be beefier springs and traction bars or something that involves welding like ladder bars or a complete linked rear axle setup.
Axle-wrap almost always causes wheel-hop, wheel hop is not always caused by axle-wrap. Improper springs, poor shocks, tires, bad shackle/spring geometry can all cause wheel hop.

At worst a bar on bottom won't prevent axle wrap all that much, at best they'll eliminate most of your wrap.. At worst a bar on top will blow your u-joints right out of the vehicle, at best they'll hardly do anything.
 
  #20  
Old 09-23-2012, 01:52 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is online now
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,925
Likes: 0
Received 962 Likes on 762 Posts
Ian--- BTW I agree with your point on the under mounted bar working better if it's the type that is attached at both ends, I was only considering the snubber style bars that are just bolted to the axle and not the frame when I made the above comments.

As for the springs bending into an S shape and allowing the driveshaft to be dislodged that really shouldn't be a problem on a truck with what should be a fairly hefty leaf pack, if they're fatigued, broken, or the straps are missing then all bets are off of course.
 
  #21  
Old 09-23-2012, 02:12 PM
danr1's Avatar
danr1
danr1 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sand Lake, MI
Posts: 5,670
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Lead Head
Incorrect, they both are allowed to pivot on both ends. It's where the rod is located on the axle that makes the difference.

Rod on top: Pinion begins to climb the ring gear and twist the axle back, the traction bar gets put under tension, which causes the front of the spring to be put under compression. This compression causes the spring to bend up into an S shape.

Rod on bottom: Pinion begins to climb ring gear and twist the axle back, the traction bar gets put under compression, which causes the spring to be put under tension (the exact opposite of the bar on top). This "tightens" the spring -making it seem stronger then it really is. It forms a kind of triangulation which prevents the axle from turning.

The single rod on bottom can still wrap under the right conditions. You need a dual bar (ladder bar), or a full linked suspension to eliminate axle wrap completely.

Go read the article I linked, or even search around some off-road and truck pulling forums. Single bars on top do not work.

Axle-wrap almost always causes wheel-hop, wheel hop is not always caused by axle-wrap. Improper springs, poor shocks, tires, bad shackle/spring geometry can all cause wheel hop.

At worst a bar on bottom won't prevent axle wrap all that much, at best they'll eliminate most of your wrap.. At worst a bar on top will blow your u-joints right out of the vehicle, at best they'll hardly do anything.
Yea I understand that, top or bottom location with pivot allowed at both ends can not completely eliminate the ability of the spring to turn into an S.
A ladder bar will because it does not allow the axle to wrap because of the difference in the way its connected at the axle.

Would it help being under rather then on top? yea little bit however it can not remove it completely. Still hugely reliant on spring stiffness, if single spring or soft weak spring pack it'd be all but useless. The axle travel up while allowing spring to "S" in reaction of pinion attempt to climb ring gear.

Same effect different location, tad better yes but only because leverage is greater, has axle by top and bottom however still a weak "four link" arrangement and reliant on the spring as an integral component, one highly subject to deflection.
 
  #22  
Old 09-23-2012, 03:02 PM
Lead Head's Avatar
Lead Head
Lead Head is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 7,867
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
It has nothing to do with leverage. A leaf spring is much stronger under tension, then compression.

A single bar on top will make axle wrap worse in most cases. It puts even more compressive force on the spring then without.

A single bar on the bottom can only reduce axle wrap, how it reduces depends on the geometry of the lower bar and the spring setup.
 
  #23  
Old 09-23-2012, 11:52 PM
Blurry94's Avatar
Blurry94
Blurry94 is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Calhoun GA
Posts: 3,477
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 35 Posts
My best experience has been with torque arm type traction bars, like the old Rancho and now LFP long bars. They bolt to the frame and then to the axle and leaf spring with their supplied hardware and brackets. These traction bars don't affect the ride quality and I don't experience any wheel hop. These are expensive, but with what I've experienced and seen with traction bars, you get what you pay for.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cdan
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
9
04-18-2013 09:56 PM
66crawler
Offroad & 4x4
3
09-13-2010 01:58 AM
PowerstrokeJunkie
1999 to 2016 Super Duty
8
10-23-2006 08:29 PM
stangman67
Brakes, Steering, Suspension, Tires, & Wheels
7
04-26-2004 09:46 AM
Knucklebuster
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
19
12-31-2003 10:38 AM



Quick Reply: easiest bolt-on traction bars for 92 f150



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:44 PM.