Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Older, Classic & Antique Trucks > 1957 - 1960 F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


1957 - 1960 F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Box Style Ford Trucks




 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2012, 03:39 AM
willowbilly3 willowbilly3 is offline
Postmaster
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,893
willowbilly3 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
A crazy thought

While laying under my all wheel drive Aerostar to measure the front suspension for a possible Aerostar swap into my 58-60 project, I got to thinking..hmmm.. I wonder how hard it would be to put the four wheel drive front from an Areostar under the fridge. Set it up with a 4.6 and E4od or whatever tranny those use. What a great cruiser and one that would do good on our winter roads.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2012, 07:47 PM
spurredon's Avatar
spurredon spurredon is offline
Postmaster
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 4,190
spurredon has a great reputation on FTE.spurredon has a great reputation on FTE.spurredon has a great reputation on FTE.spurredon has a great reputation on FTE.spurredon has a great reputation on FTE.
Well I would agree with one aspect of this idea, it's crazy! Personally have never been a big Aero fan. However, if it works for you it's the right way to go, nothing wrong with a little crazy from time to time.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2012, 11:15 PM
willowbilly3 willowbilly3 is offline
Postmaster
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,893
willowbilly3 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I've had 2 of the vans and in the winter they are awesome. Plus the 4.0 is bullet proof. It looks like the front track is a couple inches wider but I couldn't get an accurate measurement on the F100. The frame width on the van is about an inch wider and I'm not sure on oil pan clearance but it looks like an easy swap other than the angle of the input shaft on the rack.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2012, 11:27 PM
chetspencer's Avatar
chetspencer chetspencer is online now
Elder User
2005 Ford Excursion
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Fairfield, CA
Posts: 721
chetspencer is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I have a similar crazy idea of putting 1997 F450 4x4 axles and springs under my 59 F100 4X4. Might be a bad idea as my 59 is about 95% or better original, but if I can get the running gear for free I would just have to deal with the big ol' 10 nut hubs.
__________________
6.0L heads are like onions: If you peel off more than the skin it will make you cry.
Chet
1959 F100 4X4 Custom Cab Styleside
2005 Excursion limited 4X4 6.0L
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-2012, 11:08 PM
GB SISSON's Avatar
GB SISSON GB SISSON is online now
Posting Guru
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Orcas Island Wa.
Posts: 2,026
GB SISSON has a great reputation on FTE.GB SISSON has a great reputation on FTE.GB SISSON has a great reputation on FTE.GB SISSON has a great reputation on FTE.
I would venture a guess that those ten lug axles are twice as good as those five lug ones you have on there. Without running it as a dually, the track width would be too narrow for your bed. Running duals it would be too wide without added on fenders. Either way, you'd have to tub the rear fender wells. When all is said and done, you'd have a 1/2 ton frame with massive axles and springs. I agree it would look cool though........
__________________
'92 F350 4x4 dual wheel service truck. 7.3 with headers and glass packs. 5 sp man tran. 255 85 16 Toyos. 110,000 miles. '59 F350 9' flareside new project, cummins 6at turbo diesel, sm 465 4 spd. 255 85 16s again, 37 ford 1 1/2 ton stake with 53 flathead V8. 65 toyota landcruiser fj 45 longbed pickup. 54 GMC 3/4 ton flatbed w/ cummins 6at, '68 BSA 441 Victor Special, bone stock, Antique tractors and one lung flywheel engines .....
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-2012, 11:52 PM
willowbilly3 willowbilly3 is offline
Postmaster
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,893
willowbilly3 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I want this F100 to be my main daily driver. I don't need it to be a truck, have plenty of those. I would like it to be the replacement for my dorky Aerostar.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-22-2012, 12:04 AM
chetspencer's Avatar
chetspencer chetspencer is online now
Elder User
2005 Ford Excursion
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Fairfield, CA
Posts: 721
chetspencer is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB SISSON View Post
I would venture a guess that those ten lug axles are twice as good as those five lug ones you have on there. Without running it as a dually, the track width would be too narrow for your bed. Running duals it would be too wide without added on fenders. Either way, you'd have to tub the rear fender wells. When all is said and done, you'd have a 1/2 ton frame with massive axles and springs. I agree it would look cool though........
Thanks for the feedback, I'll just stick with trying to get this truck drivable for now. sorry for the hijack.
Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2012, 12:04 AM
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Older, Classic & Antique Trucks > 1957 - 1960 F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.5.2 ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.



 
vbulletin Admin Backup