Look out ford, gm, and dodge, international is entering the HD sector!!!!
#106
I thought there were more similarities to the Powerstroke flavor as well.
The EGR only technology isn't going to cut it. It sounds like Navistar doesn't want to admit defeat so they are calling their solution ICT+. Navistar
I don't understand why they are so hell bent on sticking with an EGR only solution. The availability of DEF is not an issue and the complexity argument is pretty weak. Nevermind the fact that an EGR only solution just plain wasn't cutting it!
The EGR only technology isn't going to cut it. It sounds like Navistar doesn't want to admit defeat so they are calling their solution ICT+. Navistar
I don't understand why they are so hell bent on sticking with an EGR only solution. The availability of DEF is not an issue and the complexity argument is pretty weak. Nevermind the fact that an EGR only solution just plain wasn't cutting it!
Haha. yeah it's funny how after all that time pushing to not use DEF, now they are going to have to, and they call they're solution things like
"unique", and still complement themselves on in cylinder management of NOX.
It might be possible that they will need less DEF than other guys, who knows?
International wasn't the only ones that didn't want to run DEF urea treatment, CAT is running "advanced EGR" designed with navistar, cummins was also the same, don't know what they're doing now though.
Yes it did seem stupid in hindsight, in my mind, that 1900$ penalty per engine they had to pay, could have gone towards the urea system, and mileage would have been a little better.
#108
#109
Certainly they keep updating it in an apparently futile attempt to meet emissions targets, but I'm having a tough time believing that it's a whole lot better. The 6.0L was updated several times along it's much maligned history and some of those made things worse.
#110
The F650 may have the V10 option, but from what I hear it is pretty out of place in the F650 and has very limited uses. I kind of think of it as the 5.4 in the superdutys. It is a great motor, and will get the job done, but there is another option that is better suited for the truck. The V10 should stick to (and be made available again) in F250-F550s IMO.
As for the larger cab on the small chassis, there is no reason not to, plus I'm sure it shares most if not all of the parts from the larger trucks, making the up front cost of making a new line of truck much more cost effective.
As for the larger cab on the small chassis, there is no reason not to, plus I'm sure it shares most if not all of the parts from the larger trucks, making the up front cost of making a new line of truck much more cost effective.
A gas engine has a place in a 650 sized chassis, most people just do not have enough experience in that market area to understand where the place is and why.
#111
The Terrastar is like a an F-650 body on an F-550 chassis.(kind of like GMs big bulbous fugly C4500, but at least it had a higher GVWR) I don't see the reason to put such a big body on a smaller chassis. The F-550 is proportioned much nicer IMO. Want a larger cab and a heavier duty truck than the F-550, buy an F-650. The F-650 has both gas and diesel options and will make a great tow rig.
In my opinion the International cab is far superior to the Super Duty cab. I'll probably sound like an International salesman here, but this is coming from someone who drives both a Super Duty and an International on a daily basis.
With the International's large windshield and the way you are positioned in the cab, you have MUCH better visibility of the road. Plus, the International has REAL truck mirrors, where the F-550 has the same mirrors as the pickups. Better visibility makes accidents less likely.
These pics don't really show the true difference in visibility, but they give a little idea. To get the real picture, you need to actually drive both trucks.
View of road from Super Duty cab:
View of road from International cab:
The interior of the International cab is simply HUGE compared to the Super Duty. It's taller and wider, plus it has a completely flat floor which makes even more space. It has more headroom even though it also has overhead storage bins, which the Super Duty does not have. The standard seating configuration is a single air ride seat for the driver, and a 2 seat bench for passengers. This will comfortably seat 3 people. You can squeeze 3 people in a Super Duty cab, but it's not very comfortable. There is also a large space under the bench that can be used for storage. I keep all kinds of stuff under there...moving blankets, rain suit, tow strap, emergency triangles, extra fluids, etc.
We used to have a Chevy Kodiak 6500 that I drove for a while. Just like the F-650, it just had a pickup cab on it. After driving that thing all day, I couldn't wait to get the hell out of it. However, with the International, I'm more comfortable driving it than I am when I'm driving my own Super Duty.
The full tilt hood is also much better for a truck that's going to be used daily as a work vehicle. Not only are things easier to access for service, but it makes things much easier when you go to do your daily vehicle inspection. You can easily check all fluids standing right next to the drivers side tire. The Super Duty requires you to climb up into the engine compartment to check fluids. Suspension and steering components are easily inspected with the hood open. On a Super Duty, you have to get on the ground crawl under the truck to inspect those things. Should you need to access anything at the rear of the engine, the International has a "doghouse" cover that you can remove and access the rear of the engine. Not the case on a Super Duty. IIRC, the Super Duty's entire cab may have to be lifted off the chassis to access many things.
#112
I would suspect the V10 F650s would be more limited to things like flat bed tow trucks, and maybe covered landscape trucks, you know the ones that the chippers spit stuff in.
#113
The V-10 F-650 would be good for rental trucks since the purchase price is lower, the majority of people using it are likely not used to operating a diesel and probably don't like the noise or smell of a diesel, and they don't get that many miles put on them.
It would also be good for small companies that have deliveries to make to a handful of local customers, again because of the lower purchase price and because it wouldn't get a ton of miles put on it. Of course, many smaller companies can't justify the cost of purchasing, operating, maintaining, and insuring a truck like this, and paying someone to drive it. Many companies like this will simply use a local delivery company (like the one I work for) to deliver products to their customers.
It would also be good for small companies that have deliveries to make to a handful of local customers, again because of the lower purchase price and because it wouldn't get a ton of miles put on it. Of course, many smaller companies can't justify the cost of purchasing, operating, maintaining, and insuring a truck like this, and paying someone to drive it. Many companies like this will simply use a local delivery company (like the one I work for) to deliver products to their customers.
#114
Actually, the F-650 cab is the exact same cab as the F-250-550, it just has the full tilt hood on it instead of the regular SD front clip.
I think it was truck trend. Something like that. They tested it and said it was a little under powered and their truck was empty. Granted, they had a giant dump body and a crew cab.
I would suspect the V10 F650s would be more limited to things like flat bed tow trucks, and maybe covered landscape trucks, you know the ones that the chippers spit stuff in.
I would suspect the V10 F650s would be more limited to things like flat bed tow trucks, and maybe covered landscape trucks, you know the ones that the chippers spit stuff in.
Overall, we were impressed by the capability of this vehicle with the gas engine. It has the most available horsepower in the lineup, but the least torque, yet proved plenty powerful.
Like you mentioned for flat beds, landscape trucks, rental trucks, short haul box trucks, stake body trucks and etc the V10 is a good option to have. The gasser medium duty trucks used to be more popular prior to the 21st century. Most of them used some kind of odd displacement sub 400ci gas truck engine that you usually had issues finding parts for after several years. They were slow but the diesels were slow back then also. We are getting spoiled with the power in the trucks now. They used to move at half the speed of smell when empty.
The super duty cab is kind of a visual mind trick, from the outside it looks huge, but really the bottom 1/4 to 1/3 rd of the door panel is covering the floor and section that covers the frame.
Don't get the wrong idea, I love the fords, but they look like they have a giant cab from the outside, and they do, but not as big as it might look.
And not to hijack, but is it just me, or is the cab getting more cramped as they get newer? I swear my 02 psd had more shoulder room, but maybe I just got fatter.
Don't get the wrong idea, I love the fords, but they look like they have a giant cab from the outside, and they do, but not as big as it might look.
And not to hijack, but is it just me, or is the cab getting more cramped as they get newer? I swear my 02 psd had more shoulder room, but maybe I just got fatter.
#115
I've got to say I'm a fan of it. It really isn't a bad truck at all. I found this one on the Truck Paper site:
http://www.truckpaper.com/listingsde...?OHID=3581193&
#116
That's pretty typical for a 26K GVWR truck. The International I drive is a 26K truck, and comes in at just about 16K empty (with 26' box and liftgate) so I'm left with 10K for payload. We also have some Kenworths and they are about 1,000 lbs lighter, mainly because the cabs on those are all fiberglass rather than steel.
#117
The EGR cooler(not plural) and turbo(also not plural) were completely different on the EPA 2007 MaxxForce 7 from the Powerstroke. See below.
Certainly they keep updating it in an apparently futile attempt to meet emissions targets, but I'm having a tough time believing that it's a whole lot better. The 6.0L was updated several times along it's much maligned history and some of those made things worse.
Certainly they keep updating it in an apparently futile attempt to meet emissions targets, but I'm having a tough time believing that it's a whole lot better. The 6.0L was updated several times along it's much maligned history and some of those made things worse.
Thats an old picture, I suspect when it first came out.
Fleet operators seem to be quite happy with them. DEF is on its way for these suckers too.
#118
The terrastar cab is identical to other larger models, so it's not like it has a special cab that will be hard to find parts for.
#119
That's pretty typical for a 26K GVWR truck. The International I drive is a 26K truck, and comes in at just about 16K empty (with 26' box and liftgate) so I'm left with 10K for payload. We also have some Kenworths and they are about 1,000 lbs lighter, mainly because the cabs on those are all fiberglass rather than steel.
The terrastar cab is identical to other larger models, so it's not like it has a special cab that will be hard to find parts for.
#120
Wait several years after the model is discontinued and your at the mercy of the OEM for parts. If you can find them you will pay if you can the parts. I realize that is not a consideration for the companies that get into new trucks every couple years though. All we had the last place i worked was older used trucks.