1961 - 1963 F100 Unibody 1961, 1962 and 1963 Ford F100 Unibody trucks

unibody 4x4 ??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-25-2011, 10:59 PM
old'skewl's Avatar
old'skewl
old'skewl is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
unibody 4x4 ??

Did FORD actually produce these, were they contracted out or are they customized.
 
  #2  
Old 02-26-2011, 10:35 AM
Buzz44's Avatar
Buzz44
Buzz44 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: colbert washington
Posts: 2,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dont believe they ever built these. The unibody would not hold up to the flex and twist that would be encountered. Bill Numbers Dummy or someone more knowledgable than I may chime in on this. Ive been messing with 4x4 for a few years and have never seen a factory made one. If it is yours what does the vin tag say. If you can post it up someone may decipher it for you.
 
  #3  
Old 03-03-2011, 08:37 PM
thundersnow70's Avatar
thundersnow70
thundersnow70 is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: May 2010
Location: south east South Dakota
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
i have only seen one and it looked factory. just seen it sitting and never got a close look. if it was not made by Ford, who ever did the conversion did a good job.
 
  #4  
Old 03-04-2011, 10:00 AM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 88,826
Received 648 Likes on 543 Posts
No such thing as a Uni 4WD, all were 2WD.
 
  #5  
Old 03-04-2011, 07:49 PM
agaristo77's Avatar
agaristo77
agaristo77 is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
they don't exist?

i know a guy around my area that was selling a '62 unibody 4x4. he claimed it was factory, but odds are they just put a unibody on a 4x4 frame. i'm not sure. pictures sure looked stock, the front bumper wasn't factory, but the rest of the truck looked straight, and cool as hell. if i can find some of the pictures i'll post em. hell i almost bought the thing for 1800 bux. happy with my 65 f1 tho
 
  #6  
Old 03-05-2011, 05:01 PM
garbz2's Avatar
garbz2
garbz2 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Glendale Arizona
Posts: 6,060
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Don't need pictures. only the VIN. The Vin on a two wheel drive is F10/F20.

And on a four wheel drive it is F11/F26.

No four wheel drive or two wheel drive left the factory without the correct VIN.

And i mean the one stamped on the frame not the glove box or door.

Garbz
 
  #7  
Old 07-19-2011, 04:19 PM
deflaytedwayz's Avatar
deflaytedwayz
deflaytedwayz is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I saw one in Cheyenne WY and was wondering why on earth Ford would do that. Now I know better!
 
  #8  
Old 07-20-2011, 03:13 AM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 88,826
Received 648 Likes on 543 Posts
If a Uni has 4WD, it's a conversion. Marmon Herrington (M-H) did many 4WD conversions.

If the truck is a M-H, it will have metal instruction plates attached to the dash.
 
  #9  
Old 07-20-2011, 03:19 AM
Louisville Joe's Avatar
Louisville Joe
Louisville Joe is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,371
Received 113 Likes on 84 Posts
4X4's those years were either Flareside (step-side) or used the '57-'60 Styleside box.
 
  #10  
Old 07-20-2011, 03:29 AM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 88,826
Received 648 Likes on 543 Posts
4WD also available as a Cab & Chassis.

1961/66 F100/250 4WD's that used the 1957/60 Styleside aka wrong bed: 1961/65 F100/250, 1966 F250.
 
  #11  
Old 07-25-2011, 09:50 PM
garbz2's Avatar
garbz2
garbz2 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Glendale Arizona
Posts: 6,060
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Bill

I have seen exactly one 1964 F100 uni with four wheel drive. All the frame vins matched with the door tagand title. I scoured the truck for any discrepancy and no part was out of build range. Even then i still did not believe the truck was factory assembled but a clever replication.

Yea i know there was no 64s but it had a august of 63 build. And the title stated it was a 1964 F110. Wish i still had the pictures of it.

Garbz

This truck was sold on Ebay as Genuine Factory and one of a kind about ten years ago.
 
  #12  
Old 07-26-2011, 12:49 AM
Buzz44's Avatar
Buzz44
Buzz44 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: colbert washington
Posts: 2,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Better send the medics to Garbz house I think the heat is getting to him.
 
  #13  
Old 08-02-2011, 01:49 PM
garbz2's Avatar
garbz2
garbz2 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Glendale Arizona
Posts: 6,060
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Buzz44
Better send the medics to Garbz house I think the heat is getting to him.
Truck was in New York State.

On a side note. I can construct any ford truck 61 to 66 and make it all match a specific build range, and no one will be able to tell if it is a fake or real as there as no such thing as number matchig. ND may be able to tell but not the regular rank and file.

This is why there are about 25 percent more rangers on the road today than ford ever produced as it is easy to fake.

Garbz
 
  #14  
Old 08-06-2011, 04:34 PM
ajcal225's Avatar
ajcal225
ajcal225 is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Fullerton, CA
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The genlteman I bought my '62 uni 4x4 from in 1991 claimed to have been the second owner. He says he bought it from the US Dept of Forestry in the early 80's, and that they had special ordered them from the dealer that way (dealer conversion). It may be a M-H conversion, but did not have any instruction plates. It is an F10 vin.

I can't say that any of that is true or not, but it seemed plausable enough at the time - except that there is no hint of the forestry service green paint *anywhere*.

I daily drove the truck from 91 through about 99, and have used it almost exclusivly for offroad use since. I have spit out 1 windshield and gotten one small body crack behind the passenger door - but I'd have to say it has held up *WAY* better than people imply it would. In fact, the biggest problem I have was a rear axle housing failure caused by the stress the rear lift blocks put on it. I'm running a newer 31 spline 9" from an early f150 now. I think the wider rear axle looks better, too. *shrug*



 
  #15  
Old 08-07-2011, 12:13 PM
Buzz44's Avatar
Buzz44
Buzz44 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: colbert washington
Posts: 2,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice looking rig. To bad what you are saying about it cant be traced back. It would add more validity to your story. Just keeps the mystery about Ford and their 4x4s going. Im begining to wonder are the two Im working on true 4x4 or not. I guess Ill leave that up to whoever is interested. Looks like you are enjoying yours trying to get mine to that place sometime soon.
 


Quick Reply: unibody 4x4 ??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:12 AM.