1957 - 1960 F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Box Style Ford Trucks

351 Cleveland vs 302

  #1  
Old 06-30-2012, 12:52 PM
The Truck Whisperer's Avatar
The Truck Whisperer
The Truck Whisperer is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post 351 Cleveland vs 302

My son has a 1960 F100 with a 351 cleveland and 4 barrel holley carb, it is too much engine adn he cannot afford to drive it. I spoke with someone that is interested in trading a 302 with a 2 barrel carb for the 351 and 4 barrel. Both are complete engines and in solid running order, what are the values of the two engines. Since he would be doing the labor to swap them out, would it be too much to ask that he also pick up the cost of the flywheel and possibly new clutch depending on the sizes?
 
  #2  
Old 06-30-2012, 04:42 PM
spurredon's Avatar
spurredon
spurredon is offline
Fleet Owner

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 25,207
Received 584 Likes on 524 Posts
Condition of the engine is most important. If you will be getting the engine you want and having the work done for you, you are making out well. What tranny are you running. Going from big block to small might bring a few expense items that you didn't plan on.
 
  #3  
Old 07-01-2012, 12:11 PM
52 Merc's Avatar
52 Merc
52 Merc is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Burbank, WA
Posts: 13,885
Received 2,417 Likes on 1,374 Posts
Originally Posted by The Truck Whisperer
My son has a 1960 F100 with a 351 cleveland and 4 barrel holley carb, it is too much engine adn he cannot afford to drive it. I spoke with someone that is interested in trading a 302 with a 2 barrel carb for the 351 and 4 barrel. Both are complete engines and in solid running order, what are the values of the two engines. Since he would be doing the labor to swap them out, would it be too much to ask that he also pick up the cost of the flywheel and possibly new clutch depending on the sizes?
The one part that does interchange between the Cleveland and Windsor series engines is the flywheel. If your current setup is required for the operation of the trans, be sure to keep it. You need the correct flywheel to work with your bellhousing and starter.

If you're getting a good running 302 plus installation in exchange for the 351, that's a fair deal, as long as he does a good job and it's in good running order when he's done. All things being equal, the 351C would be worth around $200-400 more than a comparable 302. It will be a relatively easy swap as the bellhousing and motor mounts will work for either. But it's still work.

Just to clarify on what spurredon said, the Cleveland is not a big block, just a different small block. It only looks big because of the head design. The 351C block itself is actually smaller than the 351W. Changing the exhaust will be the biggest hassle in doing the job.
 
  #4  
Old 07-01-2012, 01:15 PM
spurredon's Avatar
spurredon
spurredon is offline
Fleet Owner

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 25,207
Received 584 Likes on 524 Posts
Thanks for the clarification there 52 Merc!
 
  #5  
Old 07-01-2012, 01:28 PM
jacks61ford's Avatar
jacks61ford
jacks61ford is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: pahrump nv
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
according to my hollander interchange book early 289 302 with the 28oz imbalance is the same as 351c as long as its not a 351m motor
 
  #6  
Old 07-01-2012, 02:06 PM
81ChopTop's Avatar
81ChopTop
81ChopTop is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Wausau, WI
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
I'm surprised nobody has asked, does the Cleveland have 2v or 4v heads?

Look for the mark at the top corner of the heads, it'll either be a 2 or a 4.

That's going to be the major price difference. If it has the 4v heads, it's not a fair exchange at all. Just the heads and intake are worth over $500 now days.

Even if the clevor is a 2v motor, I feel the other guy is getting the better end of the deal. Try to get more out of the trade.

Go to any scrapyard and look for a 302, they're everywhere. Now look for a Cleveland, good luck.


.
 
  #7  
Old 07-01-2012, 04:18 PM
jacks61ford's Avatar
jacks61ford
jacks61ford is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: pahrump nv
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
in this neck of the woods no one wants Cleveland anything hardly any more it's all 302ho or gt40p heads forged pistons cobra stuff don't even hardly see big block stuff
 
  #8  
Old 07-01-2012, 09:17 PM
The Truck Whisperer's Avatar
The Truck Whisperer
The Truck Whisperer is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks everyone for the replies this is helping me a lot. I will definitely look to see if it is a 4v or 2v head.
 
  #9  
Old 07-01-2012, 11:28 PM
85e150's Avatar
85e150
85e150 is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 31,837
Received 1,583 Likes on 1,291 Posts
Originally Posted by The Truck Whisperer
My son has a 1960 F100 with a 351 cleveland and 4 barrel holley carb, it is too much engine adn he cannot afford to drive it. I spoke with someone that is interested in trading a 302 with a 2 barrel carb for the 351 and 4 barrel. Both are complete engines and in solid running order, what are the values of the two engines. Since he would be doing the labor to swap them out, would it be too much to ask that he also pick up the cost of the flywheel and possibly new clutch depending on the sizes?
This may be a silly suggestion, but first a question: Does that 351c have a lumpy cam or anything else besides the 4bbl that makes it "too much engine"? And what axle ratio is in the truck?

My suggestion: Rather than change motors with all that entails, put a SMALL 2bbl on the 351c, and dial the timing back for regular fuel, if it will take it. Now depending on the cam and axle this may be a worthless idea....

BUT, if you have some lumpy cam in there and short gears to match, the 302 is going to suck gas like a drunk as well, on top of straining to run at those revs.

Maybe.

Good luck with it whichever way you decide.
 
  #10  
Old 07-02-2012, 09:44 AM
gtilton.as's Avatar
gtilton.as
gtilton.as is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How bad is the gas mileage now and how much do you expect it to change dropping from a 351 to a 302? What is the ratio on the rear end of the existing truck and how hard are we stepping on the gas? I had a truck with a 460 a few years back and if I didn't kick the carb wide open it did pretty decent, if the secondaries were open all bets were off.
 
  #11  
Old 07-02-2012, 11:42 AM
Beechkid's Avatar
Beechkid
Beechkid is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,775
Received 207 Likes on 159 Posts
Originally Posted by The Truck Whisperer
My son has a 1960 F100 with a 351 cleveland and 4 barrel holley carb, it is too much engine adn he cannot afford to drive it. I spoke with someone that is interested in trading a 302 with a 2 barrel carb for the 351 and 4 barrel. Both are complete engines and in solid running order, what are the values of the two engines. Since he would be doing the labor to swap them out, would it be too much to ask that he also pick up the cost of the flywheel and possibly new clutch depending on the sizes?
TW- let me offer some help here....as back in the 80's I had a Ranchero GT 390 4V and gas prices shot up through the roof at that time......

Swaping out for the 302 is really not going to gain much at all...the 302 in trucks was under-powered so in reality, most used more throttle to get it going- end result, less MPG than rated at.

holley use to make (and I'm sure they still do) a 2V Economaster carb.....inexpensive and with a 4v to 2V adapter will bolt right up....i put one on my Ranchero and I can tell you this.....I gained 3-4 mpg city & hwy (IIRR- I went from 10/11 mpg city to 15/16 city), throttle response below 40 mph was better than the 4V, 40-60 mph was about the same, 60+ is started falling off a little and by 75+- well, it was all out of gas at 80 mph.....

IMHO, this would be the best solution.....
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
21411
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
5
04-18-2011 08:42 AM
1986FordF150I300
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
41
05-17-2009 12:20 PM
smokey-2
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
8
12-30-2003 10:25 AM
Frank 373
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
30
06-01-2003 05:39 PM
joe53051
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
11-11-2002 12:10 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 351 Cleveland vs 302



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:02 AM.