Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Older, Classic & Antique Trucks > 1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 06-14-2012, 01:41 PM
fordCOE fordCOE is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Panttila-Finland
Posts: 28
fordCOE is starting off with a positive reputation.
-51 F5 COE project

Hello again from Finland.
I have been trying to work on my new project every chance (not too many) I got last winter. And I thought that I might share some of it. If someone has good ideas etc. Anyway this is what it looked like when I got it home from Michigan. I bought the car from Eaton Rapids, MI. If somenone knows anything about this cars history, I would be very happy. I bought this car from brothers, whose father bought this car as a project for himself. Father has passed away and the sons decided to sell the project.
Click the image to open in full size.

First I had to figure out what kind of driveline I was going to use. The original flathead six was out of the question, cause gas is about 1.6 euros/litre ( about 8 bucks for gallon). That is why I decided to use a diesel. the next problem was to find a small potential diesel that would have some power, good torgue ang good mileage.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-14-2012, 02:14 PM
fordCOE fordCOE is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Panttila-Finland
Posts: 28
fordCOE is starting off with a positive reputation.
After several candidates I decided to use Mitsubishi`s 3.3TD from a light truck that has about the same total weight 14000lbs. The engine is quite small 4 cylinder turbodiesel, 117 horsepower and 279Nm torque (about 206ft/lbs I think) Smal numbers for V8 guys but this is a good choice I think, cause I would like to drive this truck with a reasonable cost all year. So I ended up byuing a whole truck that I had chop to get the parts I needed.
Click the image to open in full size.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-14-2012, 02:25 PM
fordCOE fordCOE is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Panttila-Finland
Posts: 28
fordCOE is starting off with a positive reputation.
Click the image to open in full size.



Some of you might think that why not use the -88 Mitsubishi`s frame and driveline and just change the COE cab to it. That came to my mind but I did not like the idea that my title says -88 Mitsubishi. And one reason is finnish legislation, that would make it hard to use a 50`s cab in late 80`s vehicle. Safety issues etc. Other reason is that these Mitsu frames are often rusted badly, so they would need a lot of work. So I decided to go with the original frame and cab and change/ modify the following:
- Engine and transmission
- Front axle that has power steering
- Rear axle
- All the suspension
- All the brakes of course
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-14-2012, 02:36 PM
fordCOE fordCOE is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Panttila-Finland
Posts: 28
fordCOE is starting off with a positive reputation.
Taking things apart is allways fun and fast to do First came of the engine and then I took off the front axle.



Click the image to open in full size.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-14-2012, 02:40 PM
fordCOE fordCOE is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Panttila-Finland
Posts: 28
fordCOE is starting off with a positive reputation.
Then I had to make some new attachments to join the new front axle to the COE frame:
The rear shackles come to these
Click the image to open in full size.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-14-2012, 02:49 PM
fordCOE fordCOE is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Panttila-Finland
Posts: 28
fordCOE is starting off with a positive reputation.
With these "modern" axles I can now use 16" wheels, that are much easier to get good tyres, I got rid off the 20" widowmakers, and the whole car came much closer to ground, which is important for the looks


Click the image to open in full size.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-14-2012, 03:39 PM
fordCOE fordCOE is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Panttila-Finland
Posts: 28
fordCOE is starting off with a positive reputation.
Next job was to squeeze in the new engine and tranny. It was suppose to be a small engine but somehow there is newer enough room to just bolt it in there!!! No room for the turbo, generator, fuel filters, fan, and many other things. They all have to be relocated or modified. But of course when you use entirely different drivetrain, there is lot of modifying to do.


Click the image to open in full size.

The whole middle floor has to be made a little bit higher, cause I wanted to leave some room for the suspension trave. I do not want to be hitting the oilpan with the front axle.

Click the image to open in full size.

I will post some more pics when I get a change to sit on the computer again.

Sami
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-14-2012, 04:09 PM
arctic y block's Avatar
arctic y block arctic y block is offline
Old School
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Island Southeast Alaska
Posts: 12,764
arctic y block has a superb reputationarctic y block has a superb reputationarctic y block has a superb reputationarctic y block has a superb reputationarctic y block has a superb reputationarctic y block has a superb reputationarctic y block has a superb reputationarctic y block has a superb reputationarctic y block has a superb reputationarctic y block has a superb reputationarctic y block has a superb reputation
Wow!! Cool project. This will be fun to watch.
__________________

85 XLT Bronco 351W HO 4V Dual Pipes 33X12.5 BFG's
62 Uni 390 C6 Custom Cab Sold for 9.5K
Don't just Modify it Fordify it
A Side Arm Is Like A Parachute, Tis Better To Have One An Never Need It, Than To Need One And Not Have It

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-14-2012, 04:26 PM
48fordcoe's Avatar
48fordcoe 48fordcoe is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 947
48fordcoe has a good reputation on FTE.48fordcoe has a good reputation on FTE.
Keep us posted your coe will be nice
__________________
1948 COE pickup,1948 COE 4 door ,1949 F-3 stake truck ,1952 F-7 ? to what it will be, unicycle and streel legal bumper car that Ford was going to build but he didn't have the time
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-14-2012, 11:11 PM
tinman52's Avatar
tinman52 tinman52 is offline
Welder User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: northwest MT
Posts: 3,012
tinman52 is a splendid one to beholdtinman52 is a splendid one to beholdtinman52 is a splendid one to beholdtinman52 is a splendid one to beholdtinman52 is a splendid one to beholdtinman52 is a splendid one to beholdtinman52 is a splendid one to behold
Great to see another COE project......have fun building!
__________________
Scott
'99 F250 SD 4x4, '62 F100 4x4, '52 F-1
My COE build thread;
http://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/11...uck-build.html
"you can call a pig a duck, but that won't make it quack!"
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-15-2012, 12:23 AM
52 Merc's Avatar
52 Merc 52 Merc is online now
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Kennewick, WA
Posts: 5,501
52 Merc is a name known to all52 Merc is a name known to all52 Merc is a name known to all52 Merc is a name known to all52 Merc is a name known to all52 Merc is a name known to all
Quote:
Originally Posted by fordCOE View Post
After several candidates I decided to use Mitsubishi`s 3.3TD from a light truck that has about the same total weight 14000lbs. The engine is quite small 4 cylinder turbodiesel, 117 horsepower and 279Nm torque (about 206ft/lbs I think) Smal numbers for V8 guys but this is a good choice I think,
That is a fantastic project and it looks like you are having a great time with it. Well done! I think your engine choice is a very good one, too. While you may think the power is low, it's far more than the stock 6 cylinder engine had, at 95 hp and 180 ft. lbs. torque. It'll be good for what you're going to be doing with it. And besides, you can always increase the turbo boost.
__________________

Wayne
52 Mercury M-1
among other things.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-15-2012, 12:51 AM
Cody_1948's Avatar
Cody_1948 Cody_1948 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Lansing Mi
Posts: 253
Cody_1948 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Eaton rapids michigan, I live 10mins away from there, and the cole you have ive seen in person... Wow such a very small world....
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-15-2012, 07:12 AM
raytasch's Avatar
raytasch raytasch is online now
Old guy with old toys
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: S.E. TN
Posts: 3,602
raytasch is a splendid one to beholdraytasch is a splendid one to beholdraytasch is a splendid one to beholdraytasch is a splendid one to beholdraytasch is a splendid one to beholdraytasch is a splendid one to behold
Following this one. Very interesting build, and engine choice. What body will the truck run? How will the truck be used?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-15-2012, 06:21 PM
fordCOE fordCOE is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Panttila-Finland
Posts: 28
fordCOE is starting off with a positive reputation.
I have a vision that it is going to be a open bed car hauler with a tilting bed. I have a drawing somewhere that I could show...hot rod flatz rust brown and beige grill...and mostly I am going to use the truck for hauling my own stuff from a to b and to go to work etc. but the idea of a car hauler came from my friend who needed a transportation for this:

Click the image to open in full size.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-15-2012, 06:35 PM
fordCOE fordCOE is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Panttila-Finland
Posts: 28
fordCOE is starting off with a positive reputation.
After getting the front axle in place it was time to get rid off the rear axle and line the new rear leafs with the front. I bought a laser liner to help the job and I think I got it in a few millimetres accuracy. I think that it is important to get the rear axle lined up with the front kingpins as well as possible, and the rest is adjusted with the 4 wheel alignment. Click the image to open in full size.
Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2012, 06:35 PM
 
 
 
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Older, Classic & Antique Trucks > 1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks

Tags
1947, 410, aligner, axles, build, change, coe, fit, ford, frame, front, suspension, truck, wa, wheel

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Has anyone used 2" lift shackles? Linne Super Duty & Heavy Duty 59 03-11-2014 07:29 AM
Long Time Lurker, First Time Poster wreckedis300 Michigan Chapter 17 11-05-2013 12:16 PM
10.25 Sterling Diff Question old blue beast 1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 3 04-12-2013 06:23 PM
Cargo box length vs. Wheelbase asunpe Super Duty & Heavy Duty 2 12-15-2012 04:52 PM
1938 COE 101" wheelbase with Marmon Herrington jmadsen 1947 and Older Ford Trucks 27 10-19-2012 12:11 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup