6.0L Power Stroke Diesel 2003 - 2007 F250, F350 pickup and F350+ Cab Chassis, 2003 - 2005 Excursion and 2003 - 2009 van

Victor-Reinz/Black-Onyx Headgaskets, possible reasons why they fail

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 06-01-2012, 10:20 PM
Fulthrotl's Avatar
Fulthrotl
Fulthrotl is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by ljutic ss
Can anybody come up with facts that actually show a thicker gasket has more clamping force? The torque applied to the fasteners (bolts, studs, screws) is what creates clamping force and everyone of those 14mm bolts is putting approx. 16,000 lbs. of force on the gasket.
the pressure band around the cylinder is made up of a slightly thicker
layer, so that this band squishes more, and has a higher pressure than
the rest of the gasket. this is the primary sealing ridge.

if the gasket were uniform all the way across, then the clamping,
theoretically, would be the same all the way across. that isn't a good
situation here.

the sealant applied to the gaskets, the "secret sauce", is crucial
to the gasket mating with the deck and head surfaces.

i've not bothered to look and see what the specification for surface
finish is for this engine, in microinches, but glass smooth isn't where
it's at usually. you need a very fine amount of tooth on the surface.
what is critical is the consistency of the scratch pattern. i'm guessing
something in the area of 8 microinches would be ideal.

personally, my favorite surface, both in terms of flatness, and
scratch pattern, is blanchard grinding. for cylindrical finishing,
the standard for decades has been a sunnen hone.

a rough guide... (pun intended) can be found here:

Surface Roughness (Texture) Review - Engineers Edge

i am surprised that none of the specialty gasket makers have introduced a product line
to address this problem, other than BO. seems that and OEM are the only choices available.
these folks make annealed copper gaskets for top fuel and whatnot, and i'd bet they could
come up with an interesting product.....

https://www.flatoutgroup.com/Default.aspx
 
  #17  
Old 06-02-2012, 10:44 AM
ljutic ss's Avatar
ljutic ss
ljutic ss is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Green Lane, Pa.
Posts: 2,392
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by cheezit
iirc the bolts are 12mm on a 6.0 and 14mm on a 6.4. also I dont know were your getting a spec of 150ftlb as that is wrong too.

Get your micrometers or borrow one from someone who has and check the diameter of a 6.0 head bolt you will find it's not 12mm like you claim. 12mm equals .472 14mm= .551 and the 6.4 bolts are 16mm which is .630 dia. Anybody have a used 6.0 bolt laying around that you can measure?
 
  #18  
Old 06-02-2012, 10:46 AM
ljutic ss's Avatar
ljutic ss
ljutic ss is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Green Lane, Pa.
Posts: 2,392
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by bismic
LOL - why would you even install a fire ring if it wasn't going to have more force exerted on it than the bulk of the gasket material ............. doesn't make sense.

You might as well also be asking for proof of the materials of construction used by each manufacturer to verify the physical properties of the metals and the soft goods?? They play just as important of a role ..................

Anyway - fact is that there are "structural differences" in the two gaskets and the BO/VR have a higher failure rate. Nuff said IMO.


LOL the fire ring is to prevent burnout.
 
  #19  
Old 06-02-2012, 07:37 PM
bismic's Avatar
bismic
bismic is offline
Fleet Owner
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 26,008
Received 2,460 Likes on 1,702 Posts
......... and it does it with compressive force (sealing) and proper materials of construction (as stated)

I would like for you to prove your point .... lets try that approach.

Better yet, call BPD and discuss it with him. IMO the evidence of a weaker design in the BO gaskets is quite conclusive (in the fire ring dimension AND the metal layers) - which was the intent of the post.
 
  #20  
Old 06-02-2012, 08:33 PM
UGA33's Avatar
UGA33
UGA33 is offline
Lead Driver

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Cartersville, Ga
Posts: 5,647
Received 128 Likes on 65 Posts
6.0s are 14mm and 6.4s are 16mm
 
  #21  
Old 06-02-2012, 10:05 PM
BobbyB's Avatar
BobbyB
BobbyB is offline
Senior User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Ethridge, TN
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does anyone have experience with Cometic's MLX diesel head gasket? I know Cometic has a good reputation with the performance crowd.
 
  #22  
Old 06-03-2012, 09:36 AM
ljutic ss's Avatar
ljutic ss
ljutic ss is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Green Lane, Pa.
Posts: 2,392
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by UGA33
6.0s are 14mm and 6.4s are 16mm


I am glad the bolt size is cleared up, maybe some posters will remember what size Navistar 6.0 and 6.4 head bolts are used. As for BPD, they can't even determine what material the head gaskets are made of (stainless?) just a bunch of thickness layer dimensions. Very informitive.
 
  #23  
Old 06-03-2012, 11:23 AM
Fulthrotl's Avatar
Fulthrotl
Fulthrotl is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by ljutic ss
As for BPD, they can't even determine what material the head gaskets are made of (stainless?) just a bunch of thickness layer dimensions. Very informitive.
you seem to be informed about metallurgy, mechanical engineering,
and related areas. i'm sure that with all the people on here, we could
get a dead headgasket for you to dissect, and then you'd be able to clarify
this for us.

i don't have the skills to disassemble a 5 layer cladded metal, and accurately
analyze the composition, but i do have the skills necessary to get a specimen
in the mail to you tomorrow. send my your contact information in a private
message, and i'll have one in the mail to you tomorrow afternoon.
 
  #24  
Old 06-03-2012, 11:35 AM
Fulthrotl's Avatar
Fulthrotl
Fulthrotl is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by bismic
......... and it does it with compressive force (sealing) and proper materials of construction (as stated)

I would like for you to prove your point .... lets try that approach.

Better yet, call BPD and discuss it with him. IMO the evidence is quite conclusive - which was the intent of the post.
"bismic has exceeded their stored private messages quota and cannot accept further messages until they clear some space."

somebody didn't take out the garbage......
 
  #25  
Old 06-03-2012, 12:50 PM
bismic's Avatar
bismic
bismic is offline
Fleet Owner
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 26,008
Received 2,460 Likes on 1,702 Posts
Originally Posted by Fulthrotl
somebody didn't take out the garbage......
not you too ....................
 
  #26  
Old 06-03-2012, 12:59 PM
bismic's Avatar
bismic
bismic is offline
Fleet Owner
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 26,008
Received 2,460 Likes on 1,702 Posts
Originally Posted by Fulthrotl
you seem to be informed about metallurgy, mechanical engineering,
and related areas. i'm sure that with all the people on here, we could
get a dead headgasket for you to dissect, and then you'd be able to clarify
this for us.

i don't have the skills to disassemble a 5 layer cladded metal, and accurately
analyze the composition, but i do have the skills necessary to get a specimen
in the mail to you tomorrow. send my your contact information in a private
message, and i'll have one in the mail to you tomorrow afternoon.
exactly!!

That is the way to add value, rather than detract. I am glad to have the thickness information. Makes sense to me. I would love to have the PMI info also. If someone wants to send me the samples of each, I should be able to have the material identified. PM me if you have samples (hopefully my inbox will be clear - at least I am clear for the moment!).

For me, it seems very easy to accept that if a fire ring dimension is greater on the OEM gasket, that the contact the head makes on it as it is tightened down will occur sooner than it would on the BO gasket. Initially, all the force applied to the heads will be exerted on the surface area it first contacts and the force on that area will remain higher throughout the tightening process (the amount depends on the deformation properties of the material), even though the force will distribute itself as contact is made in other areas. Again - I like having information and will not complain about it just because I would like to have more .........
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
creator
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel
30
10-24-2012 12:23 PM
rlandrum
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel
5
09-29-2011 01:42 PM
fordfan1976
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)
3
05-16-2010 01:20 AM
csramsey640
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)
4
11-12-2006 01:27 PM
ExplicitHP
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
2
01-15-2002 01:47 AM



Quick Reply: Victor-Reinz/Black-Onyx Headgaskets, possible reasons why they fail



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:05 AM.