Offroad & 4x4
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

ranger lifting question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-13-2012, 07:04 PM
mbxmitch's Avatar
mbxmitch
mbxmitch is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ranger lifting question

Hey guys I own a 93 ranger 5 speed with thru 4.0 L

If I were to add at 4 inch lift and run 33s with the stock gearing of
373 ls in my 8.8 rear what type of driving issues and differences might I run into?
Assuming I did not do the drive shaft swap?
 
  #2  
Old 05-13-2012, 10:32 PM
alpha/omega's Avatar
alpha/omega
alpha/omega is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 7,669
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Sucky at best

I had 33s and stock 4.10 in my 96 4.0 Ranger and it really made a noticeable drag on performance. I would expect 33s with 3.73s to be damn near undriveable unless you wind every gear
 
  #3  
Old 05-13-2012, 10:42 PM
critterf1's Avatar
critterf1
critterf1 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Newport, N.C.
Posts: 2,057
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
SUPER-POOCH!
 
  #4  
Old 05-14-2012, 06:11 AM
77mud's Avatar
77mud
77mud is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 7,005
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
even putting 33's on my 351 made a little performance difference...
 
  #5  
Old 05-14-2012, 07:44 AM
mbxmitch's Avatar
mbxmitch
mbxmitch is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by alpha/omega
Sucky at best

I had 33s and stock 4.10 in my 96 4.0 Ranger and it really made a noticeable drag on performance. I would expect 33s with 3.73s to be damn near undriveable unless you wind every gear

Its hard just to get into first , and shifting to soon leads to that rumbling low end vibration I was just hoping some one had the answers, also what type of fuel mileage differences with the 4.10? I can easily swap a 4.10 rear in it and get the front rebuilt
 
  #6  
Old 05-14-2012, 07:47 AM
mbxmitch's Avatar
mbxmitch
mbxmitch is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would 4.56 gears work out ? I dont know a lot about gearing I know thats low but the put them in explorers I think?
 
  #7  
Old 05-14-2012, 12:04 PM
77mud's Avatar
77mud
77mud is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 7,005
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Guessing it had 235/75/15's on it stock? which is a 27" tire 4.56's would put your cruise RPM real close to stock with 33's
 
  #8  
Old 05-14-2012, 06:40 PM
alpha/omega's Avatar
alpha/omega
alpha/omega is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 7,669
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I got like 13-15mpg with 33x12.50 swampers. 4.56 would be good but dont expect mileage to be any better.

By "wind out" i dont mean shift at 2500 rpm. Im talking 4k+

I also broke pretty much every part inside the d35 with 33s
 
  #9  
Old 05-14-2012, 07:10 PM
mbxmitch's Avatar
mbxmitch
mbxmitch is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So 4.10s with some mild performance upgrades sounds like the way to go.

Any ideas on toughening up the front diff or any replacements other then SAS?

Thans for all the answers guys
 
  #10  
Old 05-14-2012, 07:12 PM
mbxmitch's Avatar
mbxmitch
mbxmitch is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 77mud
Guessing it had 235/75/15's on it stock? which is a 27" tire 4.56's would put your cruise RPM real close to stock with 33's
That is correct. I have a brand new engine so I dont mind building it up a tad for extra hp
 
  #11  
Old 05-14-2012, 07:34 PM
alpha/omega's Avatar
alpha/omega
alpha/omega is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 7,669
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Stock the 4.0s made like 150hp at the crank and last i checked there isnt a lot available in the performance department. Someone sold a supercharger deal but it was around $2500 and made a total of about 250hp.

I think with the od manual trans id go 4.56 and forget about dumping a bunch of money into the engine.
 
  #12  
Old 05-14-2012, 07:36 PM
alpha/omega's Avatar
alpha/omega
alpha/omega is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 7,669
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Also, there isnt much you can do to a 35ttb
 
  #13  
Old 05-14-2012, 08:26 PM
mbxmitch's Avatar
mbxmitch
mbxmitch is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thats unfortunate .I saw that guys supercharger lol wish I had the money. I was just thinking a nice exhaust intake and remap or chip what ever can be done there . Well I guess I'll be hitting the salvage yard thanks guys
 
  #14  
Old 05-15-2012, 11:42 AM
captain p4's Avatar
captain p4
captain p4 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Joppa, Maryland
Posts: 8,147
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think when they started throwing them in the mustang (WHY DID THEY DO THAT?) the peformance market opened up a little, but... put a 302 in it.
 
  #15  
Old 05-15-2012, 05:13 PM
77mud's Avatar
77mud
77mud is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 7,005
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Critter has/is doing some work on one.......
 


Quick Reply: ranger lifting question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:23 AM.