Flathead vs. 302

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 04-15-2012, 05:26 PM
Old Iron 68X's Avatar
Old Iron 68X
Old Iron 68X is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Flathead vs. 302

Hey guys! I've noticed some posts about changing out the original flatheads for a 302/351. I wanted to know about what kind of driveablility issues anyone has experienced with the flatheads, and reasons for deciding to upgrade. I'm starting a project, and thought keeping the flathead would be kind of neat, but have never actually tried to keep one running during regular driving. Any input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!!
 
  #2  
Old 04-15-2012, 06:25 PM
BrockwayMT's Avatar
BrockwayMT
BrockwayMT is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Keep the flathead. Retro is cool.

I can't stand seeing everything (epecially Fords) with a small block chevy in it. The 302 is keeping it in the family but I think you lose some character with a newer engine. I think most people just have a horsepower inferiority complex that makes them do engine swaps. My neighbor has a nice '39 Chevy that he bought with a 305. He had to put a 350 in it just because he couldn't bear to live with a 'boat anchor' or 'truck engine.' I told him to just tell people it was a 283 or 327 and then it would be cool.

Sometimes the driveline is a concern. I have a ****** PU that still has the flathead six. I thought of putting a newer V8 or V6 in it but the driveline isn't up to it. Thus it was either a whole new 4x4 driveline or put a bigger engine in and not be able to hammer on it anyway. Of course if you have stock size tires on your '47 the hp from a 302 won't be a problem to the driveline because you won't put it to the ground anyway.
 
  #3  
Old 04-15-2012, 11:31 PM
newold46's Avatar
newold46
newold46 is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,509
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
I plan on running my flathead 6 until it spills it's guts all over the road. No, I don't plan on hauling much, nor cruising at anything resembling "speed", I want to drive it the way it is (or was). I have other vehicles for trips and hauling. This one is a project that I just couldn't refuse. Since everything that came with it from the factory was mostly there, I had to put it back together that way. I have no welding skills, so driveline changes were out and mostly, I didn't have the money to hot rod the thing. By the time I would have fooled around with all of the changes I needed to make, I could (and should) have just bought a new one and had done with it. This one has character the way it is. Besides, how many flathead 6's have you seen lately?
 
  #4  
Old 04-16-2012, 07:25 AM
19fifty4's Avatar
19fifty4
19fifty4 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,922
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Another vote for the flathead.
 
  #5  
Old 04-16-2012, 08:31 AM
46fordtruck's Avatar
46fordtruck
46fordtruck is online now
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 2,629
Received 26 Likes on 15 Posts
For me the decision was made because I want to drive my '46 as much as possible. I do a yearly road trip, usually for a week at a time, visiting several states in the western/southwestern US. For me, a later model engine is simply a matter of being able to get parts anywhere on the road and being able to easily keep up w traffic anywhere I go. Is the flathead a reliable engine? Of course it is, if it wasn't Ford wouldn't have used them for 20+ years. But for modern traffic, higher speeds, yes, its a bit limited.
 
  #6  
Old 04-16-2012, 10:15 AM
Flathead Red's Avatar
Flathead Red
Flathead Red is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Emerald Coast of Florida
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have several schools of thought on this. If you have a reasonably complete truck than go with what is in it. If reliability and driveability are an issue than modern is the way to go. In my case, my 40 was owned by my father who bought it from someone who installed 74 Nova running gear and powertrain in it. So in an effort to remove the chevy fromit, I am installing a 351W w/C4. The front end of the frame was cut so I am removing it and adding an IFS. If I had a stock or reasonably stock 40 I might not go the route. It's up to you. It's your truck.

Red
 
  #7  
Old 04-17-2012, 09:19 PM
schoo's Avatar
schoo
schoo is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: placer county usa?
Posts: 4,332
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
i agree with above if mostly stock i'd go that way as long as you can
 
  #8  
Old 04-20-2012, 03:43 AM
41inWV's Avatar
41inWV
41inWV is offline
Senior User

Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wild Wonderful WV
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I built my '41 rebuilding the Flathead bored the 221 to 239, MSD electronic ignition, C-4 tranny with ford 8" rearend and open drive shaft. I am currently swapping out the Flatty and installing a 5.0 HO Roller because I'm building the truck as more of a daily dirver, so higher reliablility etc. The Old Flatty, while toally rebuilt etc didn't produce enough vaccum to shift the C-4 AND manage the Power disc brakes so I installed an electric vacuum pump to manage the brakes....but still....for my plans now, the small block is much more suitable.
 
  #9  
Old 04-20-2012, 06:25 PM
Old Iron 68X's Avatar
Old Iron 68X
Old Iron 68X is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thanks, Steve. These issues are exactly the kind of things I'm trying to find out about. Never having driven a vehicle with a flathead, I wondered about driveability issues, etc. I won't be using it for long trips, so overheating probably won't be problem, but I wondered if low horsepower or lack of acceleration would be a problem. Not that I'm going to race it or anything, but I don't want to be a hazard in quickly moving city traffic.
A question similar to the power brake problem- does anyone know of a kit that mounts a power steering pump to the flathead? That might be an issue, too. Thanks for the input!
 
  #10  
Old 04-20-2012, 07:46 PM
GreatNorthWoods's Avatar
GreatNorthWoods
GreatNorthWoods is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Littleton, New Hampshire
Posts: 8,808
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
A stock flathead has about 100 HP. Most 4 cylinder cars these days will run circles around it. I would not consider driving it in heavily congested areas. Put the 302 in and you will be a lot happier. If you do keep the flathead you will need a rear end ratio change to drive over 55-60 MPH.
 
  #11  
Old 04-29-2012, 06:00 PM
geomechs's Avatar
geomechs
geomechs is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Coaldale, AB, Cdn
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've got a truck ('47) and a car ('54 Canadian Meteor) with the original flatheads. They both ran fine with the exception of some heating/vapor locking issues in 90+ weather. I was in a line-up at the Glacier Park gate one day when the temperature was 95. My '47 truck started getting very hot but I just opened the hood and sped it up. The needle sat on the last peg but no coolant was pushed out. Cooled right down when we got moving again. Both vehicles will cruise 55-60 without any problem, and up to 75 if needed but I'd tend to avoid the freeways where 75 is mandatory. I might add that the truck has 3.7 gears in the rearend and the car (I think) is 3.5 but has a Mercomatic trans so they both rev out the same at cruise speeds.
 
  #12  
Old 04-30-2012, 06:58 AM
Kestrel116's Avatar
Kestrel116
Kestrel116 is offline
New User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm going with a 302, but then I'm planning on driving 6 hours to reenactment events, and don't have a easy way of towing it back if it messes up. It had a replacement flathead in it, so it wasn't quite orginial to begin with. I'm also planning on being able to tow a 20' enclosed trailer, so 100hp was a bit questionable. Still not planning to drive faster than 55-65mph.
 
  #13  
Old 04-30-2012, 10:28 AM
christurney77's Avatar
christurney77
christurney77 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Neosho, MO
Posts: 777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm going with a 302/C4 in my rebuild. Maybe one day I will get the flathead rebuilt and put back into the truck. I'm leaving the motor mounts/ transmission mounts in so I can re-install them later. (other than the clutch area, which I'm still in the thought process of how to modify for power brakes)
 
  #14  
Old 04-30-2012, 03:22 PM
schoo's Avatar
schoo
schoo is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: placer county usa?
Posts: 4,332
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
ya know i have a 46' dump with the flat it's way under powered for today hiway driving but the engine is cool and went to local parts store for cap rotor and points ect well they hadem in stock
i'll kept the flatty
roy
 
  #15  
Old 05-07-2012, 08:37 PM
41phord's Avatar
41phord
41phord is offline
New User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Manchvegas
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What are you thinkin' My vote is keep it flat. With duals and glass packs they make music like no other.
 


Quick Reply: Flathead vs. 302



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:48 AM.