Can we just delete this 4.4 section? - Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums



3.0L Powerstroke Diesel Discuss the forthcoming 3.0L V6 Ford diesel in the F150

Can we just delete this 4.4 section?

Reply
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 04-05-2012, 06:12 PM
parkland parkland is offline
Post Fiend
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,099
parkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud of
Can we just delete this 4.4 section?

It seems like this was intended for a 4.4 l diesel for the f150 or SUV's but it just never happened.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-05-2012, 10:17 PM
Tom's Avatar
Tom Tom is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Braham, MN
Posts: 21,357
Tom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputation
I tried a couple weeks ago, and the decision was made to keep it around for a future small diesel.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-09-2012, 10:39 AM
03 SVT VERT 03 SVT VERT is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 451
03 SVT VERT has a good reputation on FTE.03 SVT VERT has a good reputation on FTE.03 SVT VERT has a good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by parkland View Post
It seems like this was intended for a 4.4 l diesel for the f150 or SUV's but it just never happened.
Technically, it did happen. Land Rover is using Ford's 4.4L diesel in the Range Rover in Europe. Unfortunately, we don't get it stateside. Kind of a shame since it's supposedly a very nice engine. It makes 308hp and 516ft-lbs of tq in Range Rover trim.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-02-2012, 07:24 PM
FORDF250HDXLT's Avatar
FORDF250HDXLT FORDF250HDXLT is online now
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Maine/Oklahoma
Posts: 15,144
FORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant future
holy crap.that would actually make a good optional diesel engine for the f250/350 trucks imho.
ford is payed by big oil not to offer it here in the states no doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-02-2012, 09:41 PM
Tom's Avatar
Tom Tom is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Braham, MN
Posts: 21,357
Tom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputationTom has a superb reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by FORDF250HDXLT View Post
ford is payed by big oil not to offer it here in the states no doubt.




I love conspiracy theories.

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-03-2012, 01:34 AM
MisterCMK's Avatar
MisterCMK MisterCMK is online now
Avid Winter Hater
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Maple Grove, MN
Posts: 23,200
MisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazy001 View Post


I love conspiracy theories.

And bad spelling. Lol
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-03-2012, 08:28 AM
seventyseven250's Avatar
seventyseven250 seventyseven250 is online now
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 4,793
seventyseven250 has much to be proud ofseventyseven250 has much to be proud ofseventyseven250 has much to be proud ofseventyseven250 has much to be proud ofseventyseven250 has much to be proud ofseventyseven250 has much to be proud ofseventyseven250 has much to be proud ofseventyseven250 has much to be proud ofseventyseven250 has much to be proud of
I work for "big oil" and we're doing everything we can to encourage fleet users to switch to Natural gas. Trust me, the oil companies aren't worried about oil demand.

These days now that gasoline engines are available with turbo and direct injection, the economy gap with diesel is pretty small. Why buy a 4.4 diesel for an F150 when you can have the ecoboost?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-04-2012, 05:44 PM
03 SVT VERT 03 SVT VERT is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 451
03 SVT VERT has a good reputation on FTE.03 SVT VERT has a good reputation on FTE.03 SVT VERT has a good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by seventyseven250 View Post
Why buy a 4.4 diesel for an F150 when you can have the ecoboost?
Lots of reasons. It would be nice if we had the choice of a diesel or ecoboost, instead of the choice being made for us.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-06-2012, 06:35 PM
arizonasuperduty007 arizonasuperduty007 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 15
arizonasuperduty007 is starting off with a positive reputation.
While gas is now direct injection in many vehicles, it still is young and still requires spark plugs. I really like my V10 and it would be better if it were direct injection. The fact is Diesel has more BTU's per gallon than does gasoline, that's where the economy is. I know this is rather direct from a new username, but diesel engines are getting better with time as well.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-06-2012, 06:37 PM
arizonasuperduty007 arizonasuperduty007 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 15
arizonasuperduty007 is starting off with a positive reputation.
I would love for smaller trucks to have a diesel in them. I was hoping for it a few years back. I would probably buy an f150 if it had a diesel.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-06-2012, 08:43 PM
parkland parkland is offline
Post Fiend
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,099
parkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by arizonasuperduty007 View Post
The fact is Diesel has more BTU's per gallon than does gasoline, that's where the economy is.

Economy? What economy? Diesel has been consistently costing more than gas, and a diesel trucks costs a ton more to buy and look after ?!?
Would you buy an f150 for a family vehicle with DPF, urea, EGR, etc ? I wouldn't.

I would consider swapping a pre-emissions diesel into an f150, but this new technology is insane, and not cost effective unless you drive a ton of miles.

IMHO, for diesel trucks to become a huge asset again, they either need to get more reliable, cheaper, or the price of diesel needs to go way down. Do any of those things sound like reality?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-06-2012, 11:54 PM
arizonasuperduty007 arizonasuperduty007 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 15
arizonasuperduty007 is starting off with a positive reputation.
I agree that diesel is a whole lot more and regulations are killing it. Wow, I think the only way it could seem like you hate diesel any more would be if you typed all caps.

There is a reason that diesel (when you compare the same size gas and diesel engines) get better fuel mileage, it is because of the btu's per gallon of diesel versus per gallon of gasoline. It's basically the same with gasoline and methanol (or other alcoholic fuels). You are correct in your summation that the economy of diesel has been eroded with all the new reg's and equipment combined with the higher price for diesel. That is why my dad hasn't been taking his boat out as often (he has the 6.0 powerstroke in his F250) and when he does, it's not as far.

When you look at towing, diesel engines have the advantage over gasoline engines with the amount of torque they produce (again the btu's per gallon). For most American's, diesel is of no real advantage unless you are looking at bio diesel. However, for myself a diesel would be better for me because I have been towing a lot. I wasn't towing much last year, however in the last couple of months business has picked up to where I actually use the capabilities of my truck. I currently have a V10, and a 7.3 diesel would really help getting up those hills with a full load. When I do buy my next truck, it will probably be a 2001 or older truck, mainly because the 7.3 is a more reliable engine (imo).

Sorry for the length of my post.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-07-2012, 10:44 AM
JIM_C's Avatar
JIM_C JIM_C is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Tucker, GA
Posts: 586
JIM_C is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.JIM_C is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I see that the military is prototyping the 4.4.
FED Bravo is a hybrid vision of the next Humvee | Fox News
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-17-2012, 09:14 AM
ruschejj's Avatar
ruschejj ruschejj is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Greenwood, SC
Posts: 6,309
ruschejj has a spectacular reputation.ruschejj has a spectacular reputation.ruschejj has a spectacular reputation.ruschejj has a spectacular reputation.ruschejj has a spectacular reputation.ruschejj has a spectacular reputation.ruschejj has a spectacular reputation.ruschejj has a spectacular reputation.ruschejj has a spectacular reputation.ruschejj has a spectacular reputation.ruschejj has a spectacular reputation.
Give me a 4.10 rear end and an 8 speed manual in my 2013 F350SRW and I would order it Monday.

Literally, we don't NEED more power. We need economy, reliability, clean diesels. Gimme max boost in every gear at 1400 rpm and I will be just fine. Smaller engine, work it easy with gearing, makes better longevity and economy. (at least I think it would)
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-17-2012, 02:23 PM
parkland parkland is offline
Post Fiend
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,099
parkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud ofparkland has much to be proud of
Maybe a 4.4l in an f250, not a SD, but just an f250.
Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
factory dana 44/60 hub color? NMFirstF2504X4 1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks 0 09-07-2016 08:57 AM
Dana 44HD only on 4x4? landers0440 1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks 38 07-05-2014 10:00 AM
BG 44K Anyone tried it? ukexplorer Explorer, Sport Trac, Mountaineer & Aviator 1 09-21-2011 07:35 AM
What tie rods for SAS d44 cyclospot Offroad & 4x4 20 01-09-2010 09:45 PM
How much lift will i need to run 44's on a 2002 excursion excursion's4fatmatt Excursion - King of SUVs 7 10-14-2003 04:49 PM


Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums >

Tags
2001, 2012, 44, diesel, f150, ford, gas, mileage, power, range, rover, sport, trac

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:25 PM.


This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.