Who Wants Sterling 10.25 disk breaks w/ GOOD ebrake? - Page 3 - Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums



1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks

View Poll Results: What rear brake system would you like for your Sterling 10.25?
Bolt-on using E350 Disk/Drums 26 54.17%
Weld-on using E350 Disk/Drums 0 0%
Don't care which as long as there is a good kit with good ebrake set up! 14 29.17%
Don't want/need sterling 10.25 disk breaks so I don't care. 8 16.67%
Voters: 48. You may not vote on this poll

Who Wants Sterling 10.25 disk breaks w/ GOOD ebrake?

Reply
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #31  
Old 09-25-2012, 09:55 AM
Spktyr Spktyr is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Dallas, TX, USA
Posts: 1,037
Spktyr is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.Spktyr is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diesel_Brad View Post
Well if they are so good and have to stop a truck in 250' then why are drums even offered? BECAUSE THEY WORK

EDIT: I see the discs are an option as of 2011
Read the Bendix white paper - standard as of 2010. And it's been optional on Kenworths since 2004.

They work, sure. So do stock 4 wheel drums on older Fords. It's just that discs work better, and not just in the sense of "can lock a wheel" either. Drums fade like hell, discs don't, and that's just one advantage.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 09-25-2012, 10:35 AM
Diesel_Brad's Avatar
Diesel_Brad Diesel_Brad is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Gilbert, PA
Posts: 18,760
Diesel_Brad has much to be proud ofDiesel_Brad has much to be proud ofDiesel_Brad has much to be proud ofDiesel_Brad has much to be proud ofDiesel_Brad has much to be proud ofDiesel_Brad has much to be proud ofDiesel_Brad has much to be proud ofDiesel_Brad has much to be proud ofDiesel_Brad has much to be proud ofDiesel_Brad has much to be proud of
If disc brakes were so good, drums wouldnt even be an option
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 09-25-2012, 03:46 PM
joshh joshh is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: near charlotte nc
Posts: 276
joshh is starting off with a positive reputation.
disk brakes have been optional on freightliner since the 90's and i see hundreds of new trucks every year mostly freightliner but some volvo and have a few petes now disk brakes are getting very common now ( i only work on new trucks straight from the factorys and spent 2.5 years at freightliner building chassis)
Also they seem to stop smoother unloaded with very light pedal pressure im sure under load they would also work better
that being said unless my drums just go to **** totally they will stay under my truck
but my toy has 4 wheel disk and stops much better than the old stock drum stuff did
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 09-25-2012, 03:52 PM
mpc07005's Avatar
mpc07005 mpc07005 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 383
mpc07005 is starting off with a positive reputation.
By that logic, unhealthy food would not exist either. You can not use that kinda of logic for your argument. Sales decisions are based on what the company believes people would prefer to buy, within the limits of the law. Having a better option does not mean people will select it, and they may pay more to have what they are familiar with, not what is best. And, as I'm sure you know, there are many other requirements of large trucks other than simple stopping power, such as service life, which may not be as important to us. And for some like myself, the drum system is shot, and will require full replacement soon. A disk kit may be easier to service, provide better response, and has a number of small advantages which have already been mentioned, at a lower overall cost.

-Mike

Also, I believe we are getting away from the intent of this thread.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 09-25-2012, 03:55 PM
joshh joshh is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: near charlotte nc
Posts: 276
joshh is starting off with a positive reputation.
and one other thing those big sandy runaway ramps coming down the mountain were started because of brake fade which drums are alot more prone to do than disk due to the cooling design
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 09-25-2012, 05:40 PM
strokin'_tatsch's Avatar
strokin'_tatsch strokin'_tatsch is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,861
strokin'_tatsch has much to be proud ofstrokin'_tatsch has much to be proud ofstrokin'_tatsch has much to be proud ofstrokin'_tatsch has much to be proud ofstrokin'_tatsch has much to be proud ofstrokin'_tatsch has much to be proud ofstrokin'_tatsch has much to be proud ofstrokin'_tatsch has much to be proud of
I can say one thing. I'm really glad I did my rear disc conversion. I don't care what anyone says about the conversion being unnecessary. My truck DOES stop better and the biggest reason I did it, I don't have to worry about my drums being filled with mud and water.. Anyone who has tried to stop with mud and water in their drum brakes knows that it doesn't work very well.

When i do my F-250, i will be running the 10.5, but I'm doing a complete '05+ swap, so I will be keeping the 8x170 lug pattern. If I was keeping the stock lug pattern, I would just machine the 10.5 hubs to work.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 09-25-2012, 06:51 PM
FORDF250HDXLT's Avatar
FORDF250HDXLT FORDF250HDXLT is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Maine/Oklahoma
Posts: 15,157
FORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant future
Quote:
Originally Posted by strokin'_tatsch View Post
I can say one thing. I'm really glad I did my rear disc conversion. I don't care what anyone says about the conversion being unnecessary. My truck DOES stop better and the biggest reason I did it, I don't have to worry about my drums being filled with mud and water.. Anyone who has tried to stop with mud and water in their drum brakes knows that it doesn't work very well.

Personally, if I was to do it on my truck, I would do a 10.5. I am actually doing it this way, but I'm doing a complete '05+ swap, so I will be keeping the 8x170 lug pattern.
you have me as confused as the NFL does.
the ruling on the field stands uh?
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 09-25-2012, 08:22 PM
strokin'_tatsch's Avatar
strokin'_tatsch strokin'_tatsch is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,861
strokin'_tatsch has much to be proud ofstrokin'_tatsch has much to be proud ofstrokin'_tatsch has much to be proud ofstrokin'_tatsch has much to be proud ofstrokin'_tatsch has much to be proud ofstrokin'_tatsch has much to be proud ofstrokin'_tatsch has much to be proud ofstrokin'_tatsch has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by FORDF250HDXLT View Post
you have me as confused as the NFL does.
the ruling on the field stands uh?
Oops. The second paragraph should have said my F-250. I did a rear disk conversion on my F-150, but it weighs a lot less and doesn't pull anything, so I'm running El Dorado calipers with hawk pads on the back, EBC pads up front.. On my F-250 I would go to the 10.5 and have better calipers than the El Dorado calipers. They work fine on my half ton, but I'm not sure I'd like them on a bigger truck. LOL I'm way too tired for forums today. I edited my original post.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 09-25-2012, 11:30 PM
donnor donnor is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Missouri - Lake of the Oz
Posts: 554
donnor is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Back where we started...

So, after going around in this circle for the past couple of days I would still be interested in such a kit. If one is not soon in the offing I may proceed on my own, but am still wondering if someone who has already been down this path can tell me if the E-250 semi-floating axle brake components would work on our full-floater 10.25 Sterlings.

dn.
Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Has anybody used the Sterling 10.5 in a dentside? Highboy74 1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks 4 12-31-2014 12:12 AM
Rear disk swap UNTAMND 1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 58 01-17-2012 12:11 AM
Dodge dual piston rear disc (e-brake) conversion Goliath1975 1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks 24 09-16-2011 09:59 AM
Sterling 10.25 axle shafts in a 10.5? moosebrew Clutch, Transmission, Differential, Axle & Transfer Case 3 07-06-2010 10:04 PM
Disk brakes 10.25? 88bronco351 Offroad & 4x4 5 08-22-2006 09:00 PM


Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums >

Tags
1025, axle, brake, brakes, bronco, clutches, disc, disk, drums, ford, line, rear, ruff, sterling, stuff, tee

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:16 AM.


This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.