1995 F150 351W Build Thread
#31
I'm interested in this thread as I may have to rebuild my 5.8 in a while. It sounds like the 5.8 would perform more effectively with the 5.0 intake, is that correct? If so, what else would one need to do to the 5.8 in order to have the parts work together? IE: cam?
If one put the 5.0 intake on the 5.8 would it give the 5.8 more bottom end or top end power? I know that intake size can mean a huge difference in bottom end torque or high rpm power so am curious.
If one put the 5.0 intake on the 5.8 would it give the 5.8 more bottom end or top end power? I know that intake size can mean a huge difference in bottom end torque or high rpm power so am curious.
#32
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,926
Likes: 0
Received 963 Likes
on
762 Posts
No
#33
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,926
Likes: 0
Received 963 Likes
on
762 Posts
If however you just want to maximize low RPM Tq then the stock parts are fine but the cam will need to change and the complete exhaust system has to go in favor of longtubes and either a single or small dual setup.
#34
#36
I think I figured out the deal with the fan shroud. I do believe the thinner shroud is for the thicker super cooling radiator. My truck did not come with the bigger radiator, but I installed one when replacing a bad one. My friends truck has the thicker shroud with the thinner radiator and the fan sits half in and half out. I guess I'll use the shroud I got from the donor truck.
#37
It sounds like that cam will be exactly what I want.
I'd like to have the 4.10 rear like the Lightning. That would also help with the get up and go department. The 3.55 will have to do for a while.
I'm kinda surprised that Ford didn't put a better cam or even a roller cam in the Lightning.
#38
ford didnt want to go above and beond to tune the 5.8 vs the 5liter.
so choke it down and put in a smaller cam to make it run like a 5liter and there you have it
i hated ford for doing what they did. the 5.8 didnt even get a knock sensor
the 5.8 has such a short lower in take because it seems as though they wanted the 5liter and the 5.8 to fit in the same height space. If you use the van for example, the 302 and the 351 dont have any more room at the top of the intake then each other. (thats my observation and conclusion)
the 351 definatly should have gotten at least the same size runners as the 302, but again, ford seems as though they wanted to restrict the 351 for some reason.
so choke it down and put in a smaller cam to make it run like a 5liter and there you have it
i hated ford for doing what they did. the 5.8 didnt even get a knock sensor
the 5.8 has such a short lower in take because it seems as though they wanted the 5liter and the 5.8 to fit in the same height space. If you use the van for example, the 302 and the 351 dont have any more room at the top of the intake then each other. (thats my observation and conclusion)
the 351 definatly should have gotten at least the same size runners as the 302, but again, ford seems as though they wanted to restrict the 351 for some reason.
You could be right about them being intentionally choked down. I wouldn't put it past them.
#39
#40
#41
I'm fairly set on running true duals down the passenger side with the mufflers turned sideways so they can be side by side. I've always wanted to have it this way instead of a SIDO muffler.
I'm thinking the little high flow bullet cats will work, but not sure exactly which ones to get. I understand that most modern cats don't need the air injection, but prefer to do it anyway. It could help. I also think it has to be connected to pass emissions.
I'm thinking the little high flow bullet cats will work, but not sure exactly which ones to get. I understand that most modern cats don't need the air injection, but prefer to do it anyway. It could help. I also think it has to be connected to pass emissions.
#42