Excursion - King of SUVs 2000 - 2005 Ford Excursion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Better mileage with bigger tires???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-26-2012, 11:10 AM
CPTMidnight's Avatar
CPTMidnight
CPTMidnight is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Minnetonka, MN
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Better mileage with bigger tires???

I have a 2005 EB 6.0 and just moved from the stock 265/75 R16s to 285/75 R16s which have added an inch or two to the overall height of the truck. My mileage on the lie-o-meter appears to have gotten worse by a mile or two based on the last few months.

The thing is that I just towed my camper out of storage - 32 foot Jayco BHS. Usually I get horrible mileage towing it. On a calm day (wind) it looks like I may have added 1-2 mph overall. It was on level ground and I was using the stock tow program. I am not counting on just a half day of driving to figure this out but it looks promising. Does this seem possible?

Did the tires push the engine/rpm's into a sweetspot?

I have not thought about it much - final drive ratio, how bigger tires impact the lie-o-meter, how those things might be fooling me... The tires did move my speedometer from being 2 mph slow to now being dead on.
 
  #2  
Old 03-26-2012, 11:49 AM
planehunter's Avatar
planehunter
planehunter is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm guessing it's a math error.
 
  #3  
Old 03-26-2012, 05:44 PM
Jmatthews's Avatar
Jmatthews
Jmatthews is offline
is a BAAAD MAN

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Winston Salem NC
Posts: 3,738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a Jayco 32bhds I tow with my 7.3. My mileage varies alot from trip to trip. I think there are many variables involved so I wouldn't count on getting better mileage from here out.
 
  #4  
Old 03-26-2012, 06:57 PM
gr8scott72's Avatar
gr8scott72
gr8scott72 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Summit, MS
Posts: 2,332
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by CPTMidnight
I have a 2005 EB 6.0 and just moved from the stock 265/75 R16s to 285/75 R16s which have added an inch or two to the overall height of the truck. My mileage on the lie-o-meter appears to have gotten worse by a mile or two based on the last few months.

The thing is that I just towed my camper out of storage - 32 foot Jayco BHS. Usually I get horrible mileage towing it. On a calm day (wind) it looks like I may have added 1-2 mph overall. It was on level ground and I was using the stock tow program. I am not counting on just a half day of driving to figure this out but it looks promising. Does this seem possible?

Did the tires push the engine/rpm's into a sweetspot?

I have not thought about it much - final drive ratio, how bigger tires impact the lie-o-meter, how those things might be fooling me... The tires did move my speedometer from being 2 mph slow to now being dead on.
Throw the lie-o-meter calculations out and do some real hand calculations. I would bet that you will find that your mileage has actually dropped.

The taller gear ratio won't overcome the added rolling resistance of the wider tire.

(I lost 1 mpg going to 285/75/16 tires.)
 
  #5  
Old 03-26-2012, 07:24 PM
wpnaes's Avatar
wpnaes
wpnaes is online now
FTE Chapter Leader

Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: N. IL
Posts: 30,011
Received 931 Likes on 679 Posts
Don't forget revolutions/mile change as you change tire size. Thus, your odometer is now undermeasuring your distance travelled.
 
  #6  
Old 03-26-2012, 08:31 PM
Curt's05's Avatar
Curt's05
Curt's05 is offline
Wiser by FTE

Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,826
Received 42 Likes on 33 Posts
Use your gps to determine how far off your odometer is, mine was off 1%...
 

Last edited by Curt's05; 03-26-2012 at 09:25 PM. Reason: add line
  #7  
Old 03-26-2012, 08:43 PM
Jmatthews's Avatar
Jmatthews
Jmatthews is offline
is a BAAAD MAN

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Winston Salem NC
Posts: 3,738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On my truck the gps showed my speedometer was more accurate with the 285's. Don' think it's a huge difference but 285's were closer.
 
  #8  
Old 03-26-2012, 09:44 PM
njneer1's Avatar
njneer1
njneer1 is offline
Posting Guru

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Southwest VA
Posts: 1,540
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know i will get crucified......but I know my trip mileage increased with bigger tires....not in town ....but highway put me under 2k rpm.......which is sweet spot for a 7.3L
 
  #9  
Old 03-26-2012, 09:47 PM
wpnaes's Avatar
wpnaes
wpnaes is online now
FTE Chapter Leader

Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: N. IL
Posts: 30,011
Received 931 Likes on 679 Posts
No worries mate, you look good up there!

now where's that 'burb?
 
Attached Images  
  #10  
Old 03-26-2012, 10:11 PM
njneer1's Avatar
njneer1
njneer1 is offline
Posting Guru

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Southwest VA
Posts: 1,540
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I knew I would get crucifed !!....the burban was not as advertised.....still dealin for a lower price......aparently "runs and drives" means something different to some folks.....
 
  #11  
Old 03-26-2012, 11:06 PM
WilPower's Avatar
WilPower
WilPower is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have 285/75s on my 02 X 7.3. ive found that my best FREEWAY miles are at 57mph on my speedo,about 1700rpms' or lower puts me right around 19 mpg, not by the lie-o-meter, basic math and i round down, otherwise it comes out as 19.7. all stock X with Stanadyne mixed with fuel, Diesil 911 hurt my mpg by 3 to 4 mpg, delo 400le every 2000 miles. had an edge evo turner....... hahahahahah HAD one!
 
  #12  
Old 03-26-2012, 11:58 PM
gr8scott72's Avatar
gr8scott72
gr8scott72 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Summit, MS
Posts: 2,332
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by WilPower
I have 285/75s on my 02 X 7.3. ive found that my best FREEWAY miles are at 57mph on my speedo,about 1700rpms' or lower puts me right around 19 mpg, not by the lie-o-meter, basic math and i round down, otherwise it comes out as 19.7. all stock X with Stanadyne mixed with fuel, Diesil 911 hurt my mpg by 3 to 4 mpg, delo 400le every 2000 miles. had an edge evo turner....... hahahahahah HAD one!
Who drive 57 on the highway?
 
  #13  
Old 03-27-2012, 12:02 AM
EXv10's Avatar
EXv10
EXv10 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Mt. Shasta California
Posts: 11,798
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by gr8scott72
Who drive 57 on the highway?
me do
 
  #14  
Old 03-27-2012, 02:19 AM
LWW's Avatar
LWW
LWW is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: NorCal
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by EXv10
me do
I'd cause a 100 car pile up on the I5 if I drove 57mph there!
 
  #15  
Old 03-27-2012, 09:19 AM
CPTMidnight's Avatar
CPTMidnight
CPTMidnight is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Minnetonka, MN
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gr8scott72
Throw the lie-o-meter calculations out and do some real hand calculations. I would bet that you will find that your mileage has actually dropped.

The taller gear ratio won't overcome the added rolling resistance of the wider tire.

(I lost 1 mpg going to 285/75/16 tires.)

Keep in mind I am using the Lie-o-meter for both calculations. I estimate its about 1.5 difference for both calculations only in the OPPOSITE direction.

All are relatively level ground (I live in MN) and driving around 63mph on average.

265 tires
Non towing freeway - ~17.5 mph
Towing Freeway - ~12 mph

285 tires (bigger)
Non towing freeway - ~16 mph
Towing Freeway - 14 mph

Difference in moving from 265 to 285
Non towing freeway - ~1.5mph worse mileage
Towing Freeway - ~2 mph better mileage

My understanding is that trucks are geared for alot of things but ultimately the cruising speed for the freeway tries to find the optimal engine revolutions with the least amount of fuel. There is a sweet spot where the amount of fuel burned reaches the bottom of the curve based on the amount of resistence on the engine. It makes sense to me that not only does the MPH change when there is more resistence - but the curve may also change meaning that the sweet spot may change. Tire size also changes the curve.

Think about it this way. If the truck were geared perfectly for towing a 32 foot travel trailer (its like pushing a garage door down the road) then it may not get optimal mileage when it is not towing. Since vehicles are sold based on optimal mph when not towing this is what they gear it for.

Not sure if this is correct thinking though.
 


Quick Reply: Better mileage with bigger tires???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:25 PM.