Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L) Diesel Topics Only

7.3 non turbo over 351 ?????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-09-2012, 08:34 PM
664x4drvr's Avatar
664x4drvr
664x4drvr is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Blue Ridge Mtn Va
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
7.3 non turbo over 351 ?????

I currently own a 1990 250 ext cab with a 351 auto, I'm looking at a 1989 Reg cab non turbo 7.3. 5 spd. Is it worth a trade to a non turbo ?????
 
  #2  
Old 03-09-2012, 08:47 PM
therifleman556's Avatar
therifleman556
therifleman556 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On the prairie
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Given equal condition theres no question the diesel is better, but you asked in the diesel forum so what answer were you expecting? Especially in a 3/4 ton! The best description anyone here has used regarding the 351 is that it "pulls like a 302 and sucks gas like a 460" what do you get for mileage anyway? Most of us get 15 to 18 mpg, some are doing better but that 15 ish is no problem for just about anyone. That 7.3 will pull the axles out from under a 351, put a turbo on it someday and you'll out-run it too.
 
  #3  
Old 03-09-2012, 09:00 PM
FORDF250HDXLT's Avatar
FORDF250HDXLT
FORDF250HDXLT is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Wabanaki Indian Territory
Posts: 18,724
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 31 Posts
how do you use your truck?
 
  #4  
Old 03-09-2012, 09:13 PM
664x4drvr's Avatar
664x4drvr
664x4drvr is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Blue Ridge Mtn Va
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Within 75 miles , pulling a goose neck cattle trailer. within 3 or so miles hauling round bales on a goose neck 1 per cent on the interstate. Do ing farm work.
 
  #5  
Old 03-09-2012, 09:16 PM
FORDF250HDXLT's Avatar
FORDF250HDXLT
FORDF250HDXLT is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Wabanaki Indian Territory
Posts: 18,724
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 31 Posts
trade trucks.you'll be pleased.
 
  #6  
Old 03-09-2012, 09:32 PM
mlouritt's Avatar
mlouritt
mlouritt is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a 90 7.3 F350 with an ATS turbo, and an 89 F150 with the 351. Both have automatic transmissions and extended cabs. I live at almost 9000 feet in the Colorado Rockies. The 7.3 diesel is far superior in both pulling a load and fuel economy. The diesel averages around 16 MPG where the 351 will average around 11 MPG. With what you are hauling, I think you would be very happy with the diesel truck trade.
 
  #7  
Old 03-09-2012, 09:48 PM
therifleman556's Avatar
therifleman556
therifleman556 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On the prairie
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just for grins; go ask the guys in the small block forum. See what they say...
 
  #8  
Old 03-09-2012, 09:51 PM
therifleman556's Avatar
therifleman556
therifleman556 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On the prairie
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FORDF250HDXLT
trade trucks.you'll be pleased.
As subtle as a handgrenade aint ya?
 
  #9  
Old 03-09-2012, 10:34 PM
RCrawler's Avatar
RCrawler
RCrawler is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Southern Oregon USA
Posts: 3,594
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Stock for stock, I'd pick the 7.3. I personally think the 351 will pull harder, but you're running at higher rpms to do so, and mileage will suffer. The 7.3 will lug along all day and not break a sweat.

There's nothing wrong with the Windsor and there is lots of potential for horsepower and useable torque with them. But you will never get the fuel mileage that you can with the diesel.

Jason
 
  #10  
Old 03-09-2012, 11:04 PM
IDIDieselJohn's Avatar
IDIDieselJohn
IDIDieselJohn is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 8,005
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
And the 7.3 will outlive the 351 by a long shot in pulling conditions......
 
  #11  
Old 03-09-2012, 11:42 PM
Aune163rd's Avatar
Aune163rd
Aune163rd is offline
Postmaster

Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Missoula, Montana
Posts: 4,410
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
7.3 will also outpower the 351 in the long run....
 
  #12  
Old 03-10-2012, 12:37 AM
Ford_Six's Avatar
Ford_Six
Ford_Six is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Big, Oregon
Posts: 18,488
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
Loaded with the diesel you will see the same mileage as empty with the 351, and the torque is way lower.
 
  #13  
Old 03-10-2012, 12:44 AM
Aune163rd's Avatar
Aune163rd
Aune163rd is offline
Postmaster

Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Missoula, Montana
Posts: 4,410
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
x2 with what Ford_Six is saying....
 
  #14  
Old 03-10-2012, 01:49 AM
David85's Avatar
David85
David85 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Campbell River, B.C.
Posts: 6,900
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Peak for peak, the horsepower is higher in the 351, but unless you spend all your time over 4000 RPM its not going to feel that way.

If diesel wasn't an option, I simply wouldn't be driving a 3/4 ton pickup. Even the cost of LPG is such that its not worth burning anymore.
 
  #15  
Old 03-10-2012, 10:38 AM
664x4drvr's Avatar
664x4drvr
664x4drvr is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Blue Ridge Mtn Va
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks guys, I like those 94.half 95,96,97. I have a long '' I wanna '' list, to go with my 40% pay cut.
 


Quick Reply: 7.3 non turbo over 351 ?????



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:32 AM.