7.3 non turbo over 351 ????? - Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums



Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L) Diesel Topics Only

7.3 non turbo over 351 ?????

Reply
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 03-09-2012, 09:34 PM
664x4drvr's Avatar
664x4drvr 664x4drvr is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Blue Ridge Mtn Va
Posts: 231
664x4drvr is starting off with a positive reputation.
7.3 non turbo over 351 ?????

I currently own a 1990 250 ext cab with a 351 auto, I'm looking at a 1989 Reg cab non turbo 7.3. 5 spd. Is it worth a trade to a non turbo ?????
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-09-2012, 09:47 PM
therifleman556's Avatar
therifleman556 therifleman556 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: From the bushes
Posts: 1,813
therifleman556 has a superb reputationtherifleman556 has a superb reputationtherifleman556 has a superb reputationtherifleman556 has a superb reputationtherifleman556 has a superb reputationtherifleman556 has a superb reputationtherifleman556 has a superb reputationtherifleman556 has a superb reputationtherifleman556 has a superb reputationtherifleman556 has a superb reputationtherifleman556 has a superb reputation
Given equal condition theres no question the diesel is better, but you asked in the diesel forum so what answer were you expecting? Especially in a 3/4 ton! The best description anyone here has used regarding the 351 is that it "pulls like a 302 and sucks gas like a 460" what do you get for mileage anyway? Most of us get 15 to 18 mpg, some are doing better but that 15 ish is no problem for just about anyone. That 7.3 will pull the axles out from under a 351, put a turbo on it someday and you'll out-run it too.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-09-2012, 10:00 PM
FORDF250HDXLT's Avatar
FORDF250HDXLT FORDF250HDXLT is online now
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Maine/Oklahoma
Posts: 15,158
FORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant future
how do you use your truck?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-09-2012, 10:13 PM
664x4drvr's Avatar
664x4drvr 664x4drvr is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Blue Ridge Mtn Va
Posts: 231
664x4drvr is starting off with a positive reputation.
Within 75 miles , pulling a goose neck cattle trailer. within 3 or so miles hauling round bales on a goose neck 1 per cent on the interstate. Do ing farm work.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-09-2012, 10:16 PM
FORDF250HDXLT's Avatar
FORDF250HDXLT FORDF250HDXLT is online now
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Maine/Oklahoma
Posts: 15,158
FORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant futureFORDF250HDXLT has a brilliant future
trade trucks.you'll be pleased.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-09-2012, 10:32 PM
mlouritt's Avatar
mlouritt mlouritt is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 69
mlouritt is starting off with a positive reputation.
I have a 90 7.3 F350 with an ATS turbo, and an 89 F150 with the 351. Both have automatic transmissions and extended cabs. I live at almost 9000 feet in the Colorado Rockies. The 7.3 diesel is far superior in both pulling a load and fuel economy. The diesel averages around 16 MPG where the 351 will average around 11 MPG. With what you are hauling, I think you would be very happy with the diesel truck trade.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-09-2012, 10:48 PM
therifleman556's Avatar
therifleman556 therifleman556 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: From the bushes
Posts: 1,813
therifleman556 has a superb reputationtherifleman556 has a superb reputationtherifleman556 has a superb reputationtherifleman556 has a superb reputationtherifleman556 has a superb reputationtherifleman556 has a superb reputationtherifleman556 has a superb reputationtherifleman556 has a superb reputationtherifleman556 has a superb reputationtherifleman556 has a superb reputationtherifleman556 has a superb reputation
Just for grins; go ask the guys in the small block forum. See what they say...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-09-2012, 10:51 PM
therifleman556's Avatar
therifleman556 therifleman556 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: From the bushes
Posts: 1,813
therifleman556 has a superb reputationtherifleman556 has a superb reputationtherifleman556 has a superb reputationtherifleman556 has a superb reputationtherifleman556 has a superb reputationtherifleman556 has a superb reputationtherifleman556 has a superb reputationtherifleman556 has a superb reputationtherifleman556 has a superb reputationtherifleman556 has a superb reputationtherifleman556 has a superb reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by FORDF250HDXLT View Post
trade trucks.you'll be pleased.
As subtle as a handgrenade aint ya?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-09-2012, 11:34 PM
RCrawler's Avatar
RCrawler RCrawler is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Southern Oregon USA
Posts: 3,594
RCrawler is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.RCrawler is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Stock for stock, I'd pick the 7.3. I personally think the 351 will pull harder, but you're running at higher rpms to do so, and mileage will suffer. The 7.3 will lug along all day and not break a sweat.

There's nothing wrong with the Windsor and there is lots of potential for horsepower and useable torque with them. But you will never get the fuel mileage that you can with the diesel.

Jason
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-10-2012, 12:04 AM
IDIDieselJohn's Avatar
IDIDieselJohn IDIDieselJohn is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 7,949
IDIDieselJohn has a great reputation on FTE.IDIDieselJohn has a great reputation on FTE.IDIDieselJohn has a great reputation on FTE.IDIDieselJohn has a great reputation on FTE.IDIDieselJohn has a great reputation on FTE.
And the 7.3 will outlive the 351 by a long shot in pulling conditions......
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-10-2012, 12:42 AM
Aune163rd's Avatar
Aune163rd Aune163rd is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Missoula, Montana
Posts: 4,397
Aune163rd has a very good reputation on FTE.Aune163rd has a very good reputation on FTE.Aune163rd has a very good reputation on FTE.
7.3 will also outpower the 351 in the long run....
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-10-2012, 01:37 AM
Ford_Six's Avatar
Ford_Six Ford_Six is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Big, Oregon
Posts: 18,022
Ford_Six has a superb reputationFord_Six has a superb reputationFord_Six has a superb reputationFord_Six has a superb reputationFord_Six has a superb reputationFord_Six has a superb reputationFord_Six has a superb reputationFord_Six has a superb reputationFord_Six has a superb reputationFord_Six has a superb reputationFord_Six has a superb reputation
Loaded with the diesel you will see the same mileage as empty with the 351, and the torque is way lower.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-10-2012, 01:44 AM
Aune163rd's Avatar
Aune163rd Aune163rd is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Missoula, Montana
Posts: 4,397
Aune163rd has a very good reputation on FTE.Aune163rd has a very good reputation on FTE.Aune163rd has a very good reputation on FTE.
x2 with what Ford_Six is saying....
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-10-2012, 02:49 AM
David85's Avatar
David85 David85 is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Campbell River, B.C.
Posts: 6,900
David85 has a good reputation on FTE.David85 has a good reputation on FTE.
Peak for peak, the horsepower is higher in the 351, but unless you spend all your time over 4000 RPM its not going to feel that way.

If diesel wasn't an option, I simply wouldn't be driving a 3/4 ton pickup. Even the cost of LPG is such that its not worth burning anymore.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-10-2012, 11:38 AM
664x4drvr's Avatar
664x4drvr 664x4drvr is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Blue Ridge Mtn Va
Posts: 231
664x4drvr is starting off with a positive reputation.
Thanks guys, I like those 94.half 95,96,97. I have a long '' I wanna '' list, to go with my 40% pay cut.
Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
non turbo powerstroke therigwelder 1994.5 - 1997 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel 12 12-26-2015 01:12 PM
I have a 1993 f250 7.3 idi turbo Cody Tatman Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L) 5 11-13-2015 07:02 PM
93 7.3l idi non turbo wanting turbo diesellife941 Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L) 49 01-12-2015 02:00 PM
#2 Injector line for 93 idi non turbo Markiv Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L) 3 03-10-2014 11:55 PM
Non-Turbo 6.9 & 7.3 timb1776 Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L) 12 05-28-2012 11:40 PM


Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums >

Tags
73, 73l, 92, block, chevy, duty, f250, good, info, mpg, small, specs, super, trucks, turbo

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:15 PM.


This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.