1999 to 2016 Super Duty 1999 to 2016 Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty with diesel V8 and gas V8 and V10 engines
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

FORD TRUCK QUESTION

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-27-2012, 11:18 AM
waystro's Avatar
waystro
waystro is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FORD TRUCK QUESTION

is the newer ford diesel's better than the old 1986's to 1996 just wondering because i have a 2011 chevy duramax diesel and thinking about buying a newer ford truck
 
  #2  
Old 02-27-2012, 11:26 AM
texastech_diesel's Avatar
texastech_diesel
texastech_diesel is offline
Token Redneck

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Breckenridge, TX
Posts: 9,089
Received 89 Likes on 48 Posts
More power with better efficiency, in a more functional overall package.

If you have a 2011 Chevy than you can already tell the difference between it and a truck made 25 years ago. Comparing the 6.7L to an IDI is like comparing a Porsche 911 with a Model T, there's just so much different with it that drawing direct comparisons is difficult.
 
  #3  
Old 02-27-2012, 08:44 PM
BrockwayMT's Avatar
BrockwayMT
BrockwayMT is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No the new Ford Diesel is not like the 6.9 and 7.3 because they were manufactured in Indianapolis or Huntsville. Your Duramax was made in Moraine, OH. The 6.7 is made my low dollar labor in Chihuaha.
 
  #4  
Old 02-28-2012, 01:40 PM
ccerniglia's Avatar
ccerniglia
ccerniglia is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Bristol, CT
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by BrockwayMT
No the new Ford Diesel is not like the 6.9 and 7.3 because they were manufactured in Indianapolis or Huntsville. Your Duramax was made in Moraine, OH. The 6.7 is made my low dollar labor in Chihuaha.

So it's made by mexicans, and is the most powerful engine to ever go into a Ford production truck.
 

Last edited by TigerDan; 02-28-2012 at 08:39 PM. Reason: Removed racist comment
  #5  
Old 02-28-2012, 01:51 PM
dkf's Avatar
dkf
dkf is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pa
Posts: 10,101
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
It depends what you consider "better". A lot more power but as far as reliability goes I wouldn't consider the new ones "better".
 
  #6  
Old 02-28-2012, 03:21 PM
ccerniglia's Avatar
ccerniglia
ccerniglia is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Bristol, CT
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by dkf
It depends what you consider "better". A lot more power but as far as reliability goes I wouldn't consider the new ones "better".

The 6.7L has already surpassed the Blue Diamond engines in reliability. Ford did a great job building their own.
 
  #7  
Old 03-01-2012, 07:35 PM
BrockwayMT's Avatar
BrockwayMT
BrockwayMT is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ccerniglia
So it's made by mexicans, and is the most powerful engine to ever go into a Ford production truck.

As for the reliability comment, what's the source? In the short term I think a newer diesel is a good choice. After warranty I'm not sure. When these newer SCR trucks get to be 5-10 years I think repair cost could be terrible. DPFs, DEF nozzles, DEF heaters, level sensors, all that stuff is going to be very costly. One could surmise that the SCR engines will have less EGR related issues than high EGR engines (6.4, 6.7 Cummins) but that could be offset by the aforementioned SCR related hardware.

I'm a Ford fan but if you have a 2011 Duramax I don't see a compelling reason to switch to Ford. If you had a 2010 or older and have a plow or heavy front end I'd recommend the Ford but the front suspension on the GM truck got beefed up well for 2011.
 
  #8  
Old 03-01-2012, 09:39 PM
A/Ox4's Avatar
A/Ox4
A/Ox4 is offline
9 ECHO 1

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 12,449
Received 35 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by BrockwayMT
No the new Ford Diesel is not like the 6.9 and 7.3 because they were manufactured in Indianapolis or Huntsville. Your Duramax was made in Moraine, OH. The 6.7 is made my low dollar labor in Chihuaha.
The Duramax is made by isuzu. I dont care where it's made.. its made by isuzu.
 
  #9  
Old 03-02-2012, 07:07 AM
Snowseeker's Avatar
Snowseeker
Snowseeker is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Stevens Point, WI
Posts: 13,471
Received 26 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by waystro
is the newer ford diesel's better than the old 1986's to 1996 just wondering because i have a 2011 chevy duramax diesel and thinking about buying a newer ford truck


NO. Everything after the 2003 7.3 is unreliable. The early 86-96 diesels that you are talking about were very reliable but just a little underpowered. IMO the 01-03 7.3 was the very best diesel ever offered in any truck! After saying this someone always chimes in and claims cummins is best but I like being able to talk to my passengers while driving.
 
  #10  
Old 03-02-2012, 07:09 AM
Snowseeker's Avatar
Snowseeker
Snowseeker is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Stevens Point, WI
Posts: 13,471
Received 26 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by BrockwayMT
As for the reliability comment, what's the source? In the short term I think a newer diesel is a good choice. After warranty I'm not sure.

Ford doesn't honer their warranties on diesels anymore.
 
  #11  
Old 03-02-2012, 09:33 PM
Powerstrokin_350's Avatar
Powerstrokin_350
Powerstrokin_350 is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 243
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ive had a 2003 6.0, Loved it!!! 1 injector and 1 turbo service/cleaning after 190,000km.

I had a 2003 7.3 in a crew truck, it was a machine to be reckoned with!!

My grandpa has a 97 7.3, 290,000 km, only work ever done was 1 valve and a piston after he revved it to 4200rpm trying to get unstuck with a stock trailer.

I have also had a 1994 and a 2001 5.9 Cummins, I loved them too, although the 2001 gave me more issues than my 6L did. All great engines.

Uncle has a Duramax, 2003, Never touched it after 250,000km

Long story short, It does not matter where they are made, It doesnt matter what you hear, they all are good depending what you are asking from it. And to quote user dkf sig from a few posts previous to mine (With the wrong tires and the right idiot any truck can get stuck... ) I would say, with any diesel truck, and the right idiot, any diesel can blow and be a pos!!

Just my opinion...
 
  #12  
Old 03-03-2012, 01:59 AM
kbuchheit's Avatar
kbuchheit
kbuchheit is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My 99 7.3 is nearly flawless. Have only replaced a camshaft position sensor and glow plug harness.

My 2004 6.0 has a few more issues but I love the power it has and has been fairly easy to work on. (especially with the help of the guys on the 6.0 forum!)

Bottom line, my father in law works at Ford and I get A-Plan pricing. Kinda hard to buy something else!
 
  #13  
Old 03-03-2012, 08:13 AM
Snowseeker's Avatar
Snowseeker
Snowseeker is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Stevens Point, WI
Posts: 13,471
Received 26 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by Powerstrokin_350
Ive had a 2003 6.0, Loved it!!! 1 injector and 1 turbo service/cleaning after 190,000km.

I had a 2003 7.3 in a crew truck, it was a machine to be reckoned with!!

My grandpa has a 97 7.3, 290,000 km, only work ever done was 1 valve and a piston after he revved it to 4200rpm trying to get unstuck with a stock trailer.

I have also had a 1994 and a 2001 5.9 Cummins, I loved them too, although the 2001 gave me more issues than my 6L did. All great engines.

Uncle has a Duramax, 2003, Never touched it after 250,000km

Long story short, It does not matter where they are made, It doesnt matter what you hear, they all are good depending what you are asking from it. And to quote user dkf sig from a few posts previous to mine (With the wrong tires and the right idiot any truck can get stuck... ) I would say, with any diesel truck, and the right idiot, any diesel can blow and be a pos!!

Just my opinion...

What is 190,000km in miles?

When I talk about reliable I am talking about 200,000 - 300,000 miles or more without problems. Pre 100,000 miles you shouldn't have to worry about anything but gas and oil with any vehicle.

ALL of our ford work trucks have over 300,000 on the clocks. A couple over 400,000 miles. On our 400K+ 6.9 and 7.3 diesels all we had to ever put in was a high pressure fuel pump in each and a lifter in the 7.3 at 375,000 miles. THAT is reliable.
 
  #14  
Old 03-03-2012, 08:22 AM
jmiley's Avatar
jmiley
jmiley is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ccerniglia
The 6.7L has already surpassed the Blue Diamond engines in reliability. Ford did a great job building their own.
It is too soon to tell if the 6.7 is a good engine, it has been out for less than 2 years.
 
  #15  
Old 03-03-2012, 08:33 AM
jmiley's Avatar
jmiley
jmiley is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Snowseeker
What is 190,000km in miles?

When I talk about reliable I am talking about 200,000 - 300,000 miles or more without problems. Pre 100,000 miles you shouldn't have to worry about anything but gas and oil with any vehicle.

ALL of our ford work trucks have over 300,000 on the clocks. A couple over 400,000 miles. On our 400K+ 6.9 and 7.3 diesels all we had to ever put in was a high pressure fuel pump in each and a lifter in the 7.3 at 375,000 miles. THAT is reliable.
I have 242,000 miles on a 2000 5.4 gas engine, no engine problems at all, still one original spark plug.

The only parts other than oil changes, brakes and tires that I have replaced is

Alternator
Starter (I think, can't be certain)
Fuel pump
Serpentine belt
Battery
Light bulb in dash panel
Flushed transmisson once
Changed engine coolant once or twice.

It is a 8,800 GVWR truck, the way it was loaded for everyday use it weighed 9,000 lbs, I would sometimes put another 2-3,000 lbs in the bed and would tow a 4,000 lb trailer with a load up to about 20,000 lbs.

It has a 4.10 LS rear end, 2wd, people say the 5.4 was underpowered and anemic, I never had an issue with where I felt it was underpowered.

I was surprised to find the old 7.3 had 265 hp and 500 ft lbs of torque, my 6.2 has 385 hp and 405 ft lbs of torque, it seems like Ford has made some substantial improvements to their gas engines, I just hope the 6.2 is as good as the old 5.4.
 


Quick Reply: FORD TRUCK QUESTION



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:45 PM.