1957 - 1960 F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Box Style Ford Trucks

Would you consider this as a good swap option for my 59 F100?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-12-2012, 12:50 AM
bobyunker's Avatar
bobyunker
bobyunker is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Burns
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would you consider this as a good swap option for my 59 F100?

Found this ad....
THIS IS A COMPLETE 82 FORD 1 TON VAN WITH A GOOD FORD 351 WINDSOR V8 AND C6 AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION.... I BOUGHT THE VAN AND DROVE IT HOME TO USE THE 351W AND C6 IN MY RESTORED 56 FORD F100.... THE VAN IS COMPLETE WITH GOOD TIRES AND BODY WHICH COULD BE SOLD.... THE MOTOR AND TRANSMISSION WERE EXCELLENT WHEN I DROVE IT HOME. I PLANNED ON MAKING THE SWAP WITHOUT REBUILDING EITHER AS I FELT THE MOTOR WAS FINE AS IS BASED ON MY INSPECTION AND WHEN I DROVE IT AND BOUGHT IT.... SELLERS INFORMATION WAS THAT THIS COMBINATION HAD BEEN INSTALLED IN THE VAN IN THE RECENT PAST BY HIS FATHER.... I HAVE REMOVED THE GRILL, FRONT BUMPER, RADIATOR, ETC FOR ACCESS TO THE ENGINE BUT ALL PARTS ARE IN THE CARGO PORTION OF THE VAN....I HAVE DECIDED THAT I MAY JUST REBUILD THE 312V8 Y BLOCK AND KEEP THE 56 F-100 STOCK AS ORIGINAL. THE ROLLING CHASSIS COULD ALSO BE SOLD, IF FOR NOTHING MORE THAN SCRAP AFTER REMOVING THE ENGINE....

VAN COULD BE PUT BACK TOGETHER AND DRIVEN AS EVERY PART IS THERE....I MAY JUST DO THAT WHEN IT WARMS UP. ...ORIGINALLY I WAS THIS IS A COMPLETE 82 FORD 1 TON VAN WITH A GOOD FORD 351 WINDSOR V8 AND C6 AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION.... I BOUGHT THE VAN AND DROVE IT HOME TO USE THE 351W AND C6 IN MY RESTORED 56 FORD F100.... THE VAN IS COMPLETE WITH GOOD TIRES AND BODY WHICH COULD BE SOLD.... THE MOTOR AND TRANSMISSION WERE EXCELLENT WHEN I DROVE IT HOME. I PLANNED ON MAKING THE SWAP WITHOUT REBUILDING EITHER AS I FELT THE MOTOR WAS FINE AS IS BASED ON MY INSPECTION AND WHEN I DROVE IT AND BOUGHT IT.... SELLERS INFORMATION WAS THAT THIS COMBINATION HAD BEEN INSTALLED IN THE VAN IN THE RECENT PAST BY HIS FATHER.... I HAVE REMOVED THE GRILL, FRONT BUMPER, RADIATOR, ETC FOR ACCESS TO 1982 THE ENGINE BUT ALL PARTS ARE IN THE CARGO PORTION OF THE VAN....I HAVE DECIDED THAT I MAY JUST REBUILD THE 312V8 Y BLOCK AND KEEP THE 56 F-100 STOCK AS ORIGINAL. THE ROLLING CHASSIS COULD ALSO BE SOLD, IF FOR NOTHING MORE THAN SCRAP AFTER REMOVING THE ENGINE....

ONLY INTERESTED IN THE MOTOR AND TRANSMISSION BUT IT IS AN EXTENDED FORD E 350 VAN AND COULD BE USED AS A WORK VAN. IF IT SELLS I WILL JUST REBUILD THE 312 V8 IN THE 56 AND KEEP IT STOCK. IF IT DOESN'T I MAY GO AHEAD WITH THE MOTOR SWAP. I HAVE SEVERAL CLASSIC CARS SO THERE IS NO HURRY EITHER WAY AND CLASSIC CARS ALWAYS TEND TO BE ONGOING.
 

Last edited by bobyunker; 02-12-2012 at 12:52 AM. Reason: Forgot to mention something
  #2  
Old 02-12-2012, 05:09 PM
GreatNorthWoods's Avatar
GreatNorthWoods
GreatNorthWoods is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Littleton, New Hampshire
Posts: 8,808
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
The 351W and C6 would give you good power but gas mileage isn't going to be great. Expect about 10-12 MPG. I'd also be leary of an engine I had not personally heard run unless you plan to rebuild it...
 
  #3  
Old 02-12-2012, 06:30 PM
bobyunker's Avatar
bobyunker
bobyunker is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Burns
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GreatNorthWoods
The 351W and C6 would give you good power but gas mileage isn't going to be great. Expect about 10-12 MPG. I'd also be leary of an engine I had not personally heard run unless you plan to rebuild it...
Re: MPG would it be any worse than a 390?
 
  #4  
Old 02-12-2012, 07:52 PM
GreatNorthWoods's Avatar
GreatNorthWoods
GreatNorthWoods is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Littleton, New Hampshire
Posts: 8,808
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by bobyunker
Re: MPG would it be any worse than a 390?
Probably not...
 
  #5  
Old 02-12-2012, 08:41 PM
spurredon's Avatar
spurredon
spurredon is offline
Fleet Owner

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 25,265
Received 613 Likes on 550 Posts
Hey Boby, are you already running an auto?
 
  #6  
Old 02-12-2012, 11:11 PM
bobyunker's Avatar
bobyunker
bobyunker is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Burns
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by spurredon
Hey Boby, are you already running an auto?
No, in fact my 3 speed with OD tranny is going out. My engine & granny is from 78 Granada straight six.
 
  #7  
Old 02-13-2012, 08:07 PM
spurredon's Avatar
spurredon
spurredon is offline
Fleet Owner

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 25,265
Received 613 Likes on 550 Posts
Originally Posted by bobyunker
Re: MPG would it be any worse than a 390?
I have a carburated 351W/C6 in my '86. 10-12 mpg is just about right. I don't have a 390 now but have a 352/C6 in my '66, and it is about the same. I can make the mpg's worse if I enjoy take-offs on a continual basis.

GreatNorthWoods is right on with his mpg estimate. I don't drive very far so mpg's don't get me too excited. I will attest to the reliability of the C6 though. Do you know how long it has been sitting idle. Definately a fluid and filter change to start with.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
old farm truck
General Automotive Discussion
2
06-03-2016 08:55 PM
NFLDFORD
1968-Present E-Series Van/Cutaway/Chassis
80
06-06-2015 07:35 PM
mos68x
1968-Present E-Series Van/Cutaway/Chassis
19
05-04-2015 11:59 AM
tugboat
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
11-21-2002 10:38 PM
curti
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
5
05-09-2001 09:27 AM



Quick Reply: Would you consider this as a good swap option for my 59 F100?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:49 PM.