Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Older, Classic & Antique Trucks > 1957 - 1960 F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


1957 - 1960 F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Box Style Ford Trucks

Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 02-12-2012, 01:50 AM
bobyunker bobyunker is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Burns
Posts: 13
bobyunker is starting off with a positive reputation.
Would you consider this as a good swap option for my 59 F100?

Found this ad....
THIS IS A COMPLETE 82 FORD 1 TON VAN WITH A GOOD FORD 351 WINDSOR V8 AND C6 AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION.... I BOUGHT THE VAN AND DROVE IT HOME TO USE THE 351W AND C6 IN MY RESTORED 56 FORD F100.... THE VAN IS COMPLETE WITH GOOD TIRES AND BODY WHICH COULD BE SOLD.... THE MOTOR AND TRANSMISSION WERE EXCELLENT WHEN I DROVE IT HOME. I PLANNED ON MAKING THE SWAP WITHOUT REBUILDING EITHER AS I FELT THE MOTOR WAS FINE AS IS BASED ON MY INSPECTION AND WHEN I DROVE IT AND BOUGHT IT.... SELLERS INFORMATION WAS THAT THIS COMBINATION HAD BEEN INSTALLED IN THE VAN IN THE RECENT PAST BY HIS FATHER.... I HAVE REMOVED THE GRILL, FRONT BUMPER, RADIATOR, ETC FOR ACCESS TO THE ENGINE BUT ALL PARTS ARE IN THE CARGO PORTION OF THE VAN....I HAVE DECIDED THAT I MAY JUST REBUILD THE 312V8 Y BLOCK AND KEEP THE 56 F-100 STOCK AS ORIGINAL. THE ROLLING CHASSIS COULD ALSO BE SOLD, IF FOR NOTHING MORE THAN SCRAP AFTER REMOVING THE ENGINE....

VAN COULD BE PUT BACK TOGETHER AND DRIVEN AS EVERY PART IS THERE....I MAY JUST DO THAT WHEN IT WARMS UP. ...ORIGINALLY I WAS THIS IS A COMPLETE 82 FORD 1 TON VAN WITH A GOOD FORD 351 WINDSOR V8 AND C6 AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION.... I BOUGHT THE VAN AND DROVE IT HOME TO USE THE 351W AND C6 IN MY RESTORED 56 FORD F100.... THE VAN IS COMPLETE WITH GOOD TIRES AND BODY WHICH COULD BE SOLD.... THE MOTOR AND TRANSMISSION WERE EXCELLENT WHEN I DROVE IT HOME. I PLANNED ON MAKING THE SWAP WITHOUT REBUILDING EITHER AS I FELT THE MOTOR WAS FINE AS IS BASED ON MY INSPECTION AND WHEN I DROVE IT AND BOUGHT IT.... SELLERS INFORMATION WAS THAT THIS COMBINATION HAD BEEN INSTALLED IN THE VAN IN THE RECENT PAST BY HIS FATHER.... I HAVE REMOVED THE GRILL, FRONT BUMPER, RADIATOR, ETC FOR ACCESS TO 1982 THE ENGINE BUT ALL PARTS ARE IN THE CARGO PORTION OF THE VAN....I HAVE DECIDED THAT I MAY JUST REBUILD THE 312V8 Y BLOCK AND KEEP THE 56 F-100 STOCK AS ORIGINAL. THE ROLLING CHASSIS COULD ALSO BE SOLD, IF FOR NOTHING MORE THAN SCRAP AFTER REMOVING THE ENGINE....

ONLY INTERESTED IN THE MOTOR AND TRANSMISSION BUT IT IS AN EXTENDED FORD E 350 VAN AND COULD BE USED AS A WORK VAN. IF IT SELLS I WILL JUST REBUILD THE 312 V8 IN THE 56 AND KEEP IT STOCK. IF IT DOESN'T I MAY GO AHEAD WITH THE MOTOR SWAP. I HAVE SEVERAL CLASSIC CARS SO THERE IS NO HURRY EITHER WAY AND CLASSIC CARS ALWAYS TEND TO BE ONGOING.

Last edited by bobyunker; 02-12-2012 at 01:52 AM. Reason: Forgot to mention something
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-12-2012, 06:09 PM
GreatNorthWoods's Avatar
GreatNorthWoods GreatNorthWoods is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Littleton, New Hampshire
Posts: 8,073
GreatNorthWoods has a very good reputation on FTE.GreatNorthWoods has a very good reputation on FTE.GreatNorthWoods has a very good reputation on FTE.GreatNorthWoods has a very good reputation on FTE.
The 351W and C6 would give you good power but gas mileage isn't going to be great. Expect about 10-12 MPG. I'd also be leary of an engine I had not personally heard run unless you plan to rebuild it...
__________________
Vern

1949 F-1
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-12-2012, 07:30 PM
bobyunker bobyunker is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Burns
Posts: 13
bobyunker is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreatNorthWoods View Post
The 351W and C6 would give you good power but gas mileage isn't going to be great. Expect about 10-12 MPG. I'd also be leary of an engine I had not personally heard run unless you plan to rebuild it...
Re: MPG would it be any worse than a 390?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-12-2012, 08:52 PM
GreatNorthWoods's Avatar
GreatNorthWoods GreatNorthWoods is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Littleton, New Hampshire
Posts: 8,073
GreatNorthWoods has a very good reputation on FTE.GreatNorthWoods has a very good reputation on FTE.GreatNorthWoods has a very good reputation on FTE.GreatNorthWoods has a very good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobyunker View Post
Re: MPG would it be any worse than a 390?
Probably not...
__________________
Vern

1949 F-1
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-12-2012, 09:41 PM
spurredon's Avatar
spurredon spurredon is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 5,347
spurredon has a great reputation on FTE.spurredon has a great reputation on FTE.spurredon has a great reputation on FTE.spurredon has a great reputation on FTE.spurredon has a great reputation on FTE.spurredon has a great reputation on FTE.
Hey Boby, are you already running an auto?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-13-2012, 12:11 AM
bobyunker bobyunker is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Burns
Posts: 13
bobyunker is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by spurredon View Post
Hey Boby, are you already running an auto?
No, in fact my 3 speed with OD tranny is going out. My engine & granny is from 78 Granada straight six.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-13-2012, 09:07 PM
spurredon's Avatar
spurredon spurredon is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 5,347
spurredon has a great reputation on FTE.spurredon has a great reputation on FTE.spurredon has a great reputation on FTE.spurredon has a great reputation on FTE.spurredon has a great reputation on FTE.spurredon has a great reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobyunker View Post
Re: MPG would it be any worse than a 390?
I have a carburated 351W/C6 in my '86. 10-12 mpg is just about right. I don't have a 390 now but have a 352/C6 in my '66, and it is about the same. I can make the mpg's worse if I enjoy take-offs on a continual basis.

GreatNorthWoods is right on with his mpg estimate. I don't drive very far so mpg's don't get me too excited. I will attest to the reliability of the C6 though. Do you know how long it has been sitting idle. Definately a fluid and filter change to start with.
Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2012, 09:07 PM
 
 
 
Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I may have changed my Mid-Ford mind... xoloski 1968-2013 Full Size Vans 1 12-27-2012 02:52 PM
Vacuum work and Carb adj? CalebJns Alabama Chapter 0 04-13-2010 12:38 AM
New Engine For 78 F100??? CalebJns 1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks 15 03-19-2010 11:18 PM
'69 F100 - '79 E150 swap? Chad M 1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1 10-20-2006 07:31 AM
e150 Van 351 to F150 motor mounts 1965-ford Engine Swaps 1 08-08-2006 12:05 PM


Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Older, Classic & Antique Trucks > 1957 - 1960 F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


Participate In The Forums

Create new posts and participate in discussions. It's free!

Sign Up »





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup