7.3 idi w/banks sidewinder
#1
02-07-2012, 08:19 AM
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Denton, NC
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#2
02-07-2012, 08:49 AM
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Wabanaki Indian Territory
Posts: 18,724
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes
on
31 Posts
without head studs, running normal boost of around 9-12, approximately 180-190 hp at the rear wheels.
may not sound all that impressive,but when your going from approximately 120-130 hp out back as n/a,your gunna know it.
this will help you decide:
Banks Power | Banks Sidewinder Turbo
they're dyno results (running basic boost) seems to be on the high side,then again so does their n/a recordings as well,compared to most members dyno's over the years.
though the difference between n/a and turbocharged is still closely related,so it does appear to be pretty dang accurate.
may not sound all that impressive,but when your going from approximately 120-130 hp out back as n/a,your gunna know it.
this will help you decide:
Banks Power | Banks Sidewinder Turbo
they're dyno results (running basic boost) seems to be on the high side,then again so does their n/a recordings as well,compared to most members dyno's over the years.
though the difference between n/a and turbocharged is still closely related,so it does appear to be pretty dang accurate.
#3
02-07-2012, 10:18 AM
Postmaster
without head studs, running normal boost of around 9-12, approximately 180-190 hp at the rear wheels.
may not sound all that impressive,but when your going from approximately 120-130 hp out back as n/a,your gunna know it.
this will help you decide:
Banks Power | Banks Sidewinder Turbo
they're dyno results (running basic boost) seems to be on the high side,then again so does their n/a recordings as well,compared to most members dyno's over the years.
though the difference between n/a and turbocharged is still closely related,so it does appear to be pretty dang accurate.
may not sound all that impressive,but when your going from approximately 120-130 hp out back as n/a,your gunna know it.
this will help you decide:
Banks Power | Banks Sidewinder Turbo
they're dyno results (running basic boost) seems to be on the high side,then again so does their n/a recordings as well,compared to most members dyno's over the years.
though the difference between n/a and turbocharged is still closely related,so it does appear to be pretty dang accurate.
#4
02-07-2012, 02:04 PM
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Wabanaki Indian Territory
Posts: 18,724
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes
on
31 Posts
"Performance
dyno test results
We checked the test truck's horsepower at the rear wheels with a Clayton 400-hp chassis dynamometer"
..................
oh,hey.i'll have them xlt mirrors shipped out to ya here in a few days.
#5
02-07-2012, 02:12 PM
Postmaster
no you silly Broncs to Giants (once they wont the SB lol) fan.
"Performance
dyno test results
We checked the test truck's horsepower at the rear wheels with a Clayton 400-hp chassis dynamometer"
..................
oh,hey.i'll have them xlt mirrors shipped out to ya here in a few days.
"Performance
dyno test results
We checked the test truck's horsepower at the rear wheels with a Clayton 400-hp chassis dynamometer"
..................
oh,hey.i'll have them xlt mirrors shipped out to ya here in a few days.
No, no, no you silly patriots fan.
"According to Banks, during development testing the Sidewinder-turbocharged Ford produced a peak power rating of 264 hp at 3300 rpm and a peak torque of 503 lb-ft at 1600 rpm, measured at the engine's flywheel, as manufacturers do."
I am a new yorker so I always liked the giants. But I like tebow on the broncos for what he stands up for(against abortion).
Thanks about the mirrors.
#6
02-07-2012, 02:25 PM
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Wabanaki Indian Territory
Posts: 18,724
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes
on
31 Posts
just one more sentence down from that snapon and you got it.
"According to Banks, during development testing the Sidewinder-turbocharged Ford produced a peak power rating of 264 hp at 3300 rpm and a peak torque of 503 lb-ft at 1600 rpm, measured at the engine's flywheel, as manufacturers do."
"We tested power output at the rear wheels, which is where it counts for the truck owner."
bottom line anyway is; if you add a banks,she's gunna move.
now i just need to get it done like you did once i get my truck back from the paint shop.
then iv got to copy your intercooler setup!
i got to get this pig up from 14.5 mpg closer to 20 before spring hits!
"According to Banks, during development testing the Sidewinder-turbocharged Ford produced a peak power rating of 264 hp at 3300 rpm and a peak torque of 503 lb-ft at 1600 rpm, measured at the engine's flywheel, as manufacturers do."
"We tested power output at the rear wheels, which is where it counts for the truck owner."
bottom line anyway is; if you add a banks,she's gunna move.
now i just need to get it done like you did once i get my truck back from the paint shop.
then iv got to copy your intercooler setup!
i got to get this pig up from 14.5 mpg closer to 20 before spring hits!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
zachbrown0413
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)
6
05-30-2016 02:49 AM
