289 V8 - Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums



1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks

289 V8

Reply
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 01-24-2012, 10:00 PM
Ole' gray's Avatar
Ole' gray Ole' gray is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Missouri
Posts: 122
Ole' gray is starting off with a positive reputation.
289 V8

So i just recently found out that sitting in our shed is a 289 V8 from a Fairlane. Dad says these are really hard to come by, but were good motors.
Ive been curious to see how you guys think this would do in a ford pickup, and, if worth it, how hard would it be to swap it into my 90 f250
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-24-2012, 10:08 PM
blkF250HD's Avatar
blkF250HD blkF250HD is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Hartland, WI
Posts: 1,119
blkF250HD is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.blkF250HD is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
It was a fairly common engine, especially in Mustangs. It's part of the Windsor family, but I'm not sure if the bellhousings were all the same (doubt it). IMO something like that would be better in a period correct (mid 60's) truck, or a car from that time. Not sure if you'd be satisfied with the power output in a heavy truck.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-24-2012, 10:09 PM
SCRebel's Avatar
SCRebel SCRebel is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Conway, South Carolina
Posts: 1,293
SCRebel is starting off with a positive reputation.
I imagine it would be like a 302. Great in a small car, or truck. But suck in a full size pickup.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-24-2012, 10:37 PM
critterf1's Avatar
critterf1 critterf1 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Newport, N.C.
Posts: 2,057
critterf1 has a good reputation on FTE.critterf1 has a good reputation on FTE.critterf1 has a good reputation on FTE.
Bell-housings are the same except for the early 289 with only 5 bolts.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-25-2012, 10:45 AM
Ole' gray's Avatar
Ole' gray Ole' gray is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Missouri
Posts: 122
Ole' gray is starting off with a positive reputation.
well the problem is my current 5.8 runs like crap, and id prefer to have a lower power (which is still probably more than i got now) but more reliable engine. also perhaps get some better milage
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-25-2012, 10:50 AM
andym's Avatar
andym andym is online now
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Where the road leads, USA
Posts: 17,137
andym has a superb reputationandym has a superb reputationandym has a superb reputationandym has a superb reputationandym has a superb reputationandym has a superb reputationandym has a superb reputationandym has a superb reputationandym has a superb reputationandym has a superb reputationandym has a superb reputation
Why would you want less power? That makes no sense. It won't be any more reliable, and I really doubt it will get any better mileage, unless you count the times you'll have to get out and push it up the hill.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-25-2012, 11:09 AM
Ole' gray's Avatar
Ole' gray Ole' gray is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Missouri
Posts: 122
Ole' gray is starting off with a positive reputation.
no, u mis read, id prefer to have a lower power motor compared to one that runs crappy
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-25-2012, 11:20 AM
andym's Avatar
andym andym is online now
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Where the road leads, USA
Posts: 17,137
andym has a superb reputationandym has a superb reputationandym has a superb reputationandym has a superb reputationandym has a superb reputationandym has a superb reputationandym has a superb reputationandym has a superb reputationandym has a superb reputationandym has a superb reputationandym has a superb reputation
I did misread that. But, ideally, wouldn't you like to have a powerful motor that runs smooth? Why not fix the 351w and have that?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-25-2012, 11:46 AM
SCRebel's Avatar
SCRebel SCRebel is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Conway, South Carolina
Posts: 1,293
SCRebel is starting off with a positive reputation.
I second rebuilding, or fixing the 351w.

Keep the 289. Stick it in a old mustang, small ranger, bronco2, ect.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-25-2012, 11:54 AM
White 97 xlt's Avatar
White 97 xlt White 97 xlt is online now
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cleveland, TN
Posts: 4,400
White 97 xlt has a superb reputationWhite 97 xlt has a superb reputationWhite 97 xlt has a superb reputationWhite 97 xlt has a superb reputationWhite 97 xlt has a superb reputationWhite 97 xlt has a superb reputationWhite 97 xlt has a superb reputationWhite 97 xlt has a superb reputationWhite 97 xlt has a superb reputationWhite 97 xlt has a superb reputationWhite 97 xlt has a superb reputation
Just repair the 351, when and if you get the 289 COBBLED into the truck, you will have a lower horsepower engine that still runs like crap .. Even if you got it to run well your fuel mileage will be terrible since the smaller engine will be working it's self to death trying to keep up.. And, if you have an OD transmission just FORGET about overdrive, the 289 won't have enough torque at a low RPM to make it useful..

I'm not trying to pee on your parade, just pointing out reality..
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-25-2012, 03:28 PM
tbirdscott's Avatar
tbirdscott tbirdscott is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Willow River B.C.
Posts: 561
tbirdscott is starting off with a positive reputation.
289 is a destroked 302. The crank and rods are the difference between the two. Use the same pistons, heads, and intakes.

I would never give up a 351W for a 289/302.

Didn't it occur to you that fixing your 351 would be easier than rebuilding and swapping in a different engine?

Scott
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-25-2012, 07:22 PM
Ole' gray's Avatar
Ole' gray Ole' gray is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Missouri
Posts: 122
Ole' gray is starting off with a positive reputation.
I know your all right about fixing my current engine..... its just frustrating as all hell just cause i dont know whats wrong, and neither does anyone else, and i dont have the money to fix it even if i did know what was wrong
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-25-2012, 07:31 PM
86F150302's Avatar
86F150302 86F150302 is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 3,052
86F150302 has a very good reputation on FTE.86F150302 has a very good reputation on FTE.86F150302 has a very good reputation on FTE.
Have you tried pulling the codes???
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-25-2012, 07:39 PM
Ole' gray's Avatar
Ole' gray Ole' gray is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Missouri
Posts: 122
Ole' gray is starting off with a positive reputation.
If i say yes will you believe me?, no i havent as im not getting a check engine light, and yes the light works.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-25-2012, 08:25 PM
White 97 xlt's Avatar
White 97 xlt White 97 xlt is online now
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cleveland, TN
Posts: 4,400
White 97 xlt has a superb reputationWhite 97 xlt has a superb reputationWhite 97 xlt has a superb reputationWhite 97 xlt has a superb reputationWhite 97 xlt has a superb reputationWhite 97 xlt has a superb reputationWhite 97 xlt has a superb reputationWhite 97 xlt has a superb reputationWhite 97 xlt has a superb reputationWhite 97 xlt has a superb reputationWhite 97 xlt has a superb reputation
There could be stored codes in the continuous memory without a light being on...

If you don't have the money to fix this engine, where do you plan to get the money to do a swap???
Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need some advice D Wing 1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks 15 06-24-2012 08:43 PM
289 in F-150? znewman2012 1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 8 07-28-2011 07:36 PM
How do you know if a 66 289 is a HI PO or not? bigwin56f100 Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W) 8 05-19-2009 05:46 PM
289 to 300 swap Billy Zoom Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300 46 04-30-2009 01:46 PM
lower gearing Orange Crush Offroad & 4x4 5 04-19-2004 11:09 PM


Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums >

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:48 PM.


This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.