Bw 1356, np205, clocking, and strength questions
#1
Bw 1356, np205, clocking, and strength questions
Hey guys, i got a 94 f250 4x4, 7.3, factory zf5 and 1356. 4.10 gears. I did the dana 60 swap in the front, and lincoln locked it. Im running 38in xml's. 7.3 is putting 400ft lbs at idle. I do a lot of low speed crawling, but tough stuff. My front driveline is eating ujoints like crazy, shaft to case is way over angled. So i have to clock it, but im wondering if i should swap in a np205? So my questions are, is the 1356 really a weak link? Will the np205 meet straight to my zf5? I dont wanna do any divorced crap.. I already read about supporting the np205 with crossmembers. And what has to be done for hooking up the orig 4x4 in the cab? Its a manual shifter.
Has anyone broke the 1356? What can it withstand?
Thanks
Has anyone broke the 1356? What can it withstand?
Thanks
#2
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Marlboro Mental Hospital.
Posts: 60,973
Received 3,101 Likes
on
2,163 Posts
#3
I deal with both cases a lot. The chain cases should really get a new chain at about 125K-150K, and they have a pump that rides the shaft, and has a steel stop that rides in the aluminum/magnesium, and is famous for breaking loose and spinning instead of pumping and also destroying internal parts. I have repaired a few of those also. If maintained, the 1356 is a beast of a chain case with a nice and low gear ratio (2.7:1) that you would find useful whether you think so or not. And contrary to what some may think, it can be modded for 2wd low. The 1356 is much longer than the NP205, and usually slip yoke rear output, unless you get one from a Big Bronco. Watch out for problematic electric shift versions.
NP205 is famous for being bomb-proof, partially due to its chainless helical gear setup, and partially because it has a somewhat protective low gear ratio (1.96:1). Unlike the BW, it can easily be modified to give you front wheel drive only, Hi and Lo, and 2wd Low.
In your truck, you would install the NP205 and find that the front driveshaft is too long, and would mount a few inches closer to the center of driveline. This may or may not be a crossmember/exhaust problem for you. You also have to knotch out your transmission 4x4 tailhousing for the rear axle's shift rail, and its about 250 LBS. vs. about 80 LBS. BW, so adding another support at the NP205 is a must.
With either case, it is possible, and sounds needed, to clock the front output location downward to help with angles. Clocking it downward would also help any crossmember/exhaust/driveshaft clearance issues.
Hope that helps.
NP205 is famous for being bomb-proof, partially due to its chainless helical gear setup, and partially because it has a somewhat protective low gear ratio (1.96:1). Unlike the BW, it can easily be modified to give you front wheel drive only, Hi and Lo, and 2wd Low.
In your truck, you would install the NP205 and find that the front driveshaft is too long, and would mount a few inches closer to the center of driveline. This may or may not be a crossmember/exhaust problem for you. You also have to knotch out your transmission 4x4 tailhousing for the rear axle's shift rail, and its about 250 LBS. vs. about 80 LBS. BW, so adding another support at the NP205 is a must.
With either case, it is possible, and sounds needed, to clock the front output location downward to help with angles. Clocking it downward would also help any crossmember/exhaust/driveshaft clearance issues.
Hope that helps.
#4
What's wrong with the electric shift versions? Just curious cause I have one
I deal with both cases a lot. The chain cases should really get a new chain at about 125K-150K, and they have a pump that rides the shaft, and has a steel stop that rides in the aluminum/magnesium, and is famous for breaking loose and spinning instead of pumping and also destroying internal parts. I have repaired a few of those also. If maintained, the 1356 is a beast of a chain case with a nice and low gear ratio (2.7:1) that you would find useful whether you think so or not. And contrary to what some may think, it can be modded for 2wd low. The 1356 is much longer than the NP205, and usually slip yoke rear output, unless you get one from a Big Bronco. Watch out for problematic electric shift versions.
NP205 is famous for being bomb-proof, partially due to its chainless helical gear setup, and partially because it has a somewhat protective low gear ratio (1.96:1). Unlike the BW, it can easily be modified to give you front wheel drive only, Hi and Lo, and 2wd Low.
In your truck, you would install the NP205 and find that the front driveshaft is too long, and would mount a few inches closer to the center of driveline. This may or may not be a crossmember/exhaust problem for you. You also have to knotch out your transmission 4x4 tailhousing for the rear axle's shift rail, and its about 250 LBS. vs. about 80 LBS. BW, so adding another support at the NP205 is a must.
With either case, it is possible, and sounds needed, to clock the front output location downward to help with angles. Clocking it downward would also help any crossmember/exhaust/driveshaft clearance issues.
Hope that helps.
NP205 is famous for being bomb-proof, partially due to its chainless helical gear setup, and partially because it has a somewhat protective low gear ratio (1.96:1). Unlike the BW, it can easily be modified to give you front wheel drive only, Hi and Lo, and 2wd Low.
In your truck, you would install the NP205 and find that the front driveshaft is too long, and would mount a few inches closer to the center of driveline. This may or may not be a crossmember/exhaust problem for you. You also have to knotch out your transmission 4x4 tailhousing for the rear axle's shift rail, and its about 250 LBS. vs. about 80 LBS. BW, so adding another support at the NP205 is a must.
With either case, it is possible, and sounds needed, to clock the front output location downward to help with angles. Clocking it downward would also help any crossmember/exhaust/driveshaft clearance issues.
Hope that helps.
#5
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Marlboro Mental Hospital.
Posts: 60,973
Received 3,101 Likes
on
2,163 Posts
#6
Agreed , I replaced mine once haven't had a problem with engagement yet , although currently the 2 lights for the push button do not work , and the plastic brackets that holds it to the dash snapped a few weeks ago, I tried to post on the parts section here to see if anyone has the full assembly but is says i am not allowed to
#7
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Marlboro Mental Hospital.
Posts: 60,973
Received 3,101 Likes
on
2,163 Posts
Trending Topics
#8
#10
#12
which you conveniently sell......did you ever get the "prototype doublers" out to the guys on pirate that paid you? :stirspot:
truf! if it were my junk i'd go cheap and tough. married 205 to a divorced 200 clocked down.
truf! if it were my junk i'd go cheap and tough. married 205 to a divorced 200 clocked down.
#13
The problem with a doubler is I already have little space to work with being a single cab short bed. I am going to put a SCS 23" drop transfer case once I have the nerve to spend 4grand for it. But currently the tc works and when it breaks I will more than likely try a junkyard 205 first I should just do it right the first time but I have a wife that constantly nags about spending my hard earned $ on my toys so when we break down in the middle of a pond and she gets to get her new shoes all muddy then ill get my way : D
#15
damn, didn't even notice your truck was a shorty in your avatar. 4k is crazy dumb money for one simple part. i'd look into a 2x trans with a divorced np200. should be somewhere pretty close in length compared to a married 205, and the 200 has a little more drop and can be clocked as much as you want. hell a divorced 205 would probably work just as good.