Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > EcoBoost (all engine sizes)
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


EcoBoost (all engine sizes) 3.5L Twin Turbo EcoBoost V6, 2.7 Twin Turbo EcoBoost V6, 2.3l/2.0L I4 EcoBoost Engines

Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 01-10-2012, 12:24 AM
Nimbus Nimbus is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 11
Nimbus is starting off with a positive reputation.
2012 Ecoboost vs 2012 Tundra - have both

My title may sound confusing but here's the story.

Two days ago my wife chose a 2012 Double cab Tundra as her personal "car". Of course, I insisted she get an SR-5 & The off-road package. She picked a Pyrite Mica color. She totaled her 2006 Mercedes a few weeks back & was trying to decide between a new Mercedes E350 or the Tundra. Short story, we drove the Tundra home & I saved over $25,000.00! We traded in my 2008 F350 diesel with 220,000 miles - my work truck.

The company decided to supply me with a new 2012 F-150 with an Ecoboost engine. It's a 4 x 4 extended cab XLT so it will be interesting to compare the two trucks. I'll get my new F-150 around the 10th of January so until then I can't compare the two rigs.

I promise to keep the forum updated on impressions, mileage, etc on the two new trucks. Of course, I'll put on 40,000+ miles a year, while she puts on 6,000 or so miles per year. So from the begining the Tundra has that advantage.

Also note; I am a die hard Ford man at heart.

Cheers!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-10-2012, 12:25 AM
Nimbus Nimbus is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 11
Nimbus is starting off with a positive reputation.
Got the Ecoboost!

I've been out of state on business for 8 days so my 2012 Tundra sat at home in the garage. I've only driven it around 40 miles so I still don't know the truck very well yet. So far I really like it.

Today, I was handed the key to my company supplied 2012 F150 Ecoboost. It had 115 total miles. I drove it home the 50 miles after work so I have equal time in both rigs. Some quick observations:

The Ford has a 36 gallon tank as opposed to the Tundra's 24.
The Ford provides much more info to the driver. Miles to empty, miles per gallon, etc.
The Ford seemed real quiet driving home tonight but again, I haven't driven the Tundra for over 9 days.
I like the feel of the steering & input from the road better on the Tundra.
The Ford has about a 5" hump on the floor in front of the seat...that bugged me tonight.

In comparing the way the trucks are equipped was interesting. I bought the Tundra off of the lot & my company ordered the F150 but they are quite similar. The sticker prices were only a few hundred dollars apart hovering right around $38,000.00.
Both have tow packages, power rear windows, syncing, cloth seats. My Tundra has four doors, the Ford has suicide doors. When its just me, I prefer the suicide doors. The Tundra has true bucket seats, the Ford has what they call a "60,40,60" seat.

Btw, the Ford showed my average fuel consumption on the way home at 17.9. My speed was 62 MPH on level ground with no passing. I'm taking the Ford on a 1,200 mile trip starting Sunday so I'll do some manual MPG's.

The Ford will get driven 40,000 miles a year, the Tundra probably around 8,000 so that will be the biggest discrepancy.

I'll keep driving & posting!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-10-2012, 07:31 AM
96sherm's Avatar
96sherm 96sherm is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Yorkton Sask
Posts: 19,422
96sherm has much to be proud of96sherm has much to be proud of96sherm has much to be proud of96sherm has much to be proud of96sherm has much to be proud of96sherm has much to be proud of96sherm has much to be proud of96sherm has much to be proud of96sherm has much to be proud of96sherm has much to be proud of
should be interesting to hear your thoughts after driving them both for a while!
__________________
Canada

2014 F350/6.7/4x4/CC/SWB/Lariat
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-19-2012, 10:59 PM
Nimbus Nimbus is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 11
Nimbus is starting off with a positive reputation.
I just returned from a 1,300 mile trip with the F-150. We averaged 75 MPH on the way down to Southern Idaho but averaged much slower coming home through Montana due to blizzard conditions & icy, slick roads. The Ecoboost averaged 17.3...not bad. It also handled the slick roads great. With the traction control I hardly ever went into 4X4.

Side note; It was my wife's first ride in the F-150 & she really, really liked it. She even took it shopping one day while I was in meetings. Her impression was that the F-150 was smaller & more car-like than the Tundra. She asked; Why did we buy a Tundra again? Remember, we've been traveling a lot this month & have only racked up 400 miles on the Tundra. I looking forward to driving it more after the four days in the F-150.

I shot a quick pix before we left for credibility reasons!
Click the image to open in full size.[/IMG]
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-20-2012, 06:41 AM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins tseekins is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hampton, Virginia
Posts: 20,037
tseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputation
This is going to be the beginning of decent thread. I'm not certain if the Tundra has Electric power assisted steering or not, but it's a huge contributor to it's nimble feel.

When I jump into my '04 Expy after driving my truck. I feel like I'm driving a truck even though it's smaller.
__________________
Tim
SCPO United States Coast Guard Retired
2011 F-150 XLT 4x4 Ecoboost
2010 Ford Focus
2004 Expedition XLT 4x2

FTE Guidelines
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-23-2012, 07:49 AM
senix's Avatar
senix senix is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 21,012
senix has a superb reputationsenix has a superb reputationsenix has a superb reputationsenix has a superb reputationsenix has a superb reputationsenix has a superb reputationsenix has a superb reputationsenix has a superb reputationsenix has a superb reputationsenix has a superb reputationsenix has a superb reputation
My impressions of the Tundra's that I have had for rentals was pretty poor.

Ill fitting seats, mirrors set too far back to be useful and guages blocked by the steering wheel.

Last one that I used was probaby an 09.
__________________
Scott-2013 F350 with a lot of tires.
2013 40' 4-slider stoneridge 5th wheel coming in at 15,400; 2015 Lincoln MKC
http://www.ford-trucks.com/guidelines.html

Previous Truck 2008 F250 6.4 with lots of upgrades and a suspension upgrade from Torklift International StableLoads
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-29-2012, 08:44 PM
1badfish's Avatar
1badfish 1badfish is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 15
1badfish is starting off with a positive reputation.
EB vs. Tundra

MORE, MORE, MORE!!!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-29-2012, 09:50 PM
Nimbus Nimbus is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 11
Nimbus is starting off with a positive reputation.
Okay, it appears time to write un update.

Ford mileage 3,300. Tundra 1,070.

I have practically lived in the Ford this month & thus haven't hardly driven the garage queen Tundra. But yesterday, I did take a personal outing to Seattle area & back & logged another 600 miles on the Tundra.

The Tundra mileage seems stuck at 14.9 while the Ecoboost seems to hover around 17.3.

My father-in-law who owns a Raptor drove the Tundra yesterday for about 25 miles & was really impressed. This surprised me! We drove on a hilly, pot-holed road that he travels weekly. He felt the Tundra has more get up & go then his Raptor but rode a bit harsher. The Tundra felt like a 3/4 ton to him compared to his Raptor.

My impressions? Well, the Tundra seemed larger to me too. You ride higher in the Tundra & the leg & headroom are much more spacious than the F-150. I liked the Tundra's orange display instrument lights at night & found them much more soothing than the blue display in my F-150 which I have to turn to it's lowest setting at night. The F-150 gives a lot of display data in the information center most of it I really don't need. I also like the way my arms seem to fit the door & center armrest while driving. The Tundra's telescoping steering wheel is nice too.

I drove the F-150 again today to run a few errands in town. It did seem much smaller & more agile than the Tundra. But again, yesterday I was in a very tight parking lot at a major mall & the Tundra navigated around all the idiots & tight parking just great. I think it's more of a perception of largeness than reality. Remember, I traded in a 2008 F350 Screw that I drove 230,000 miles...now it was a bear to park in tight places.

Three things I hate about the Ford. The sun visor only seems to want to stay in two different positions - neither where I want it to stay. The lower storage under the center seat is a pain to get to & the upper on is too small. Third; the controls on the steering wheel especially the cruise seems to be poorly thought out. Maybe because it's different than my F350 & perhaps I'll get used to it.

All in all, after my wife spent some time driving the F-150 she thought maybe we'd made a mistake in buying a Tundra for our personal driver. But after spending yesterday in the Tundra the jury is still out. Overall, the Tundra was great to travel in yesterday!

Gosh, to think I've always professed to be a Ford man!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-31-2012, 05:58 PM
SpoolinF150 SpoolinF150 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 4
SpoolinF150 is starting off with a positive reputation.
I totally agree with you on the sun visor - I'm not sure what Ford was thinking! Once you go past about 40% open, it flips all the way open, and won't stay anywhere inbetween.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-02-2012, 12:12 AM
dukie1877's Avatar
dukie1877 dukie1877 is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: mckenna wa
Posts: 862
dukie1877 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.dukie1877 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Duke Averill
subscribing been looking at the ecoboost and have been impressed it might end up being my second truck Thank you for the great description on both vehicles I can tell you are trying your best to not be a ford man when comparing the two and your doing a good job keep it up
__________________
Duke Averill
2003 F250 xlt 4x4 6.5"lift, 37"tires, sinister egr delete, New oil cooler,new oem head gaskets, ARP head studs, 4" down pipe,
WTB=Powermax turbo, sct 8900 touch,4:56 gears, Blue fuel spring,fuel guage, winch, fender flares,
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-08-2012, 06:18 PM
Dim Sum's Avatar
Dim Sum Dim Sum is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 961
Dim Sum has a great reputation on FTE.Dim Sum has a great reputation on FTE.Dim Sum has a great reputation on FTE.Dim Sum has a great reputation on FTE.Dim Sum has a great reputation on FTE.
Is her Tundra the 4.6 or the 5.7?

I owned an 07 Tundra 5.7 Crewmax Limited and I really liked that truck. I'd buy another one in a heartbeat if I was looking for a 1/2 ton that is used for tow duty.

I like my 6.7 better, but then again, the truck costs another 20k.
__________________
-Steve
2014 F-250 SB CC Platinum 6.7 4x4: FX4, sunroof, Ruby Red Metallic, REV Tonneau cover, bedrug, under steps LED lights, LED interior lights, Husky Floor Mats and mud flaps, Rancho 9000XL shocks, Bilstien 5100 steering damper, bed mat bed liner, cab lights
2012 VW Golf TDI 6MT 4Dr Tech
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-08-2012, 08:28 PM
TRENT310's Avatar
TRENT310 TRENT310 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Whitecourt AB, Canada
Posts: 1,596
TRENT310 has a spectacular reputation.TRENT310 has a spectacular reputation.TRENT310 has a spectacular reputation.TRENT310 has a spectacular reputation.TRENT310 has a spectacular reputation.TRENT310 has a spectacular reputation.TRENT310 has a spectacular reputation.TRENT310 has a spectacular reputation.TRENT310 has a spectacular reputation.TRENT310 has a spectacular reputation.TRENT310 has a spectacular reputation.
TRENT310
Same thread, same OP posts, different responses! Love it.
__________________
2011 F-350SD - SRW XLT FX4 CCLB: 6.7L PSD, 6R140, 3.55:1 EL, Job 2 (Daily Driver)
With BDS 6" 4-Link & Rear Leafs, Fox 2.0 IFP, Toyo MT 38x13.50R18 on 18x9 Fuel D525, Bulletproof Prerunner Bumper, EGR/DPF/SCR delete.

1994 RAM 2500 - SLT Laramie 4x4 RCLB 5.9L 6BT NV4500 (Project)
2009 Tundra - SR5 4x2 RCLB 5.7L 4.30:1 (Sold)
Others: 1995 F-350HD DRW 4x2 CCFB 7.3L-T444E PSD // 2004 F-350SD SRW 4x4 CCLB 6.0L-VT365 PSD.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-08-2012, 11:23 PM
Nimbus Nimbus is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 11
Nimbus is starting off with a positive reputation.
Her Tundra has the 5.7L. We purchased it with the idea of pulling boat, horse trailer, & camping trailer.

I came from a 6.4L F350 which I drove for 232,000 miles. Relatively trouble free. It was the fourth Ford Diesel I had owned. They were all good & somehow I missed the pleasure of owning a 6.0L diesel. I'm not too fond of that engine.

Our campany has a dozen or so 6.7L engines. Most are in F550 service trucks but we have a few F250/350 pickups too. Other than the exhaust fluid hassle the guys all seem to like them.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-11-2012, 10:38 PM
amascio's Avatar
amascio amascio is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 30
amascio is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Your EB mileage pretty much jives with mine - 17.5 is my average over the last 12,000 miles. It seems that if you drive sedately or hyper mile the EB engine it'll adapt to that, then when you need it to crank to and punch it, it has problems.
Best thing is to keep it blown out regularly (like every time you drive it). If this is done, it'll always run fine.

How do I know? I got mesmerized trying to get the best mpg possible and actually got my FX4 up 19.9 mpg just taking it easy. But while all this was going on I noticed that the truck just didn't feel "crisp" any more and then, finally, while merging into traffic one day she got short winded on me when I opened her up. For several days I was perplexed over all this.

Then while out in the Texas hill country, I decided to blow off mpg's and just flog the truck to have some fun. Every grade I had to climb was done in passing gear, full bore until I had to let off. I caned my truck for 45 miles like that and when I parked, I had my old truck back. All those bad habits GONE!

Now, I just drive it without regard to mpg's and the truck has settled in around 17.5 - exactly what she used to do before my hyper mile madness. Enjoy your EB truck, just remember, baby loves the whip.... a lot!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-29-2012, 11:42 PM
PrinceValium's Avatar
PrinceValium PrinceValium is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Northern California
Posts: 2,305
PrinceValium has a great reputation on FTE.PrinceValium has a great reputation on FTE.PrinceValium has a great reputation on FTE.PrinceValium has a great reputation on FTE.PrinceValium has a great reputation on FTE.
This is a good thread...I have the F150 in the back of my head...I have been hanging out in the 6.7 forum because I was convinced that was what I want and need...but lately I am revisiting my decisions.

Any more updates??
Reply With Quote
Old 02-29-2012, 11:42 PM
 
 
 
Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ford F150 EB (or 5.0) vs Toyota Tundra MacDug 2009 - 2014 F150 87 11-25-2014 03:49 PM
Tell me why F150 and not Tundra mudshack 2009 - 2014 F150 89 04-23-2014 01:46 PM
Tundra 5.7 vs F250 6.2 leghorn95 6.2L V8 15 07-11-2013 05:46 PM
WHY DOES FORD NOT INCLUDE THE 5.7 TUNDRA IN ANY TOWING TESTS? AB328 2009 - 2014 F150 18 02-27-2012 09:22 PM
Drove A Tundra RocketScience Ford vs The Competition 94 03-20-2008 07:33 PM


Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > EcoBoost (all engine sizes)

Tags
150, 2012, boost, diesel, eco, ecoboost, engines, f150, ford, mileage, mpg, supercharger, truck, tundra, vs

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


Participate In The Forums

Create new posts and participate in discussions. It's free!

Sign Up »





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup