1982 4.9l auto gas mileage?
#1
#2
You will lose 1 to 2 mpg gallon with the automatic(torque converter slip) and your rearend ratio may be different. Look for a tag on each rearend or look at the rearend codes on the door jamb of each truck. Write back in with the codes and we can look them up and tell you the ratio. If the 13mpg truck has a higher number in the rearend, that's where the other mpg is going.
#3
#4
#7
I know they liked throwing the codes around with the change over to the 8.8" but since he said he had two 1982's I already knew the codes from memory and didn't list one of the many exceptions to thse trucks .
If he said he had an 83-86 I wouldn't be sure about the codes, because I have seen 9" rear ends factory installed in 1986 F150/Broncos.
If he said he had an 83-86 I wouldn't be sure about the codes, because I have seen 9" rear ends factory installed in 1986 F150/Broncos.
Trending Topics
#8
No biggie, it gave me an excuse to go post all those pages.
I look at it from the point of who is going to be looking in these threads in the future (perhaps via Google) while researching their own truck.
While your post may be true, it's only in the context of, in this case, 1982, whereas the forum covers 80-86.
Just wanting to keep things as accurate as can reasonably be....
I look at it from the point of who is going to be looking in these threads in the future (perhaps via Google) while researching their own truck.
While your post may be true, it's only in the context of, in this case, 1982, whereas the forum covers 80-86.
Just wanting to keep things as accurate as can reasonably be....
#9
I'm not saying yours has either of those problems, but it could and either of them will kill your mileage. Yes, plugs, wires, caps, and rotors can hurt the mileage, but usually not kill it the way timing will because timing works on all cylinders and only the rotor of the other stuff does.
#10
My truck is a '86 with the 4.9 and a T-18 4 speed trans. The rear axle has 3.55 gears (code 19)
During the summer when I drove it everyday running a lawn service business, which included highway, city, and everything in between I got a steady 13 mpg. On long highway trips I can get close to 15 mpg but I have to keep it between 55 and 60 mph (So getting passed by big rigs on the interstate is normal )
I'm not sure what the factory mpg ratings were for these but I know that the numbers they got in the 80's were VERY optimistic. I've heard that they did the test on dyno's which did not simulate real driving and the strain that is put on the engine.
During the summer when I drove it everyday running a lawn service business, which included highway, city, and everything in between I got a steady 13 mpg. On long highway trips I can get close to 15 mpg but I have to keep it between 55 and 60 mph (So getting passed by big rigs on the interstate is normal )
I'm not sure what the factory mpg ratings were for these but I know that the numbers they got in the 80's were VERY optimistic. I've heard that they did the test on dyno's which did not simulate real driving and the strain that is put on the engine.
#11
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern California
Posts: 8,786
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
17 Posts
The EPA did their tests on dynos with an average speed of 48 MPH.
It is quite possible to get the estimated EPA in your vehicle though with the right gearing and tires combination, and driving at 55 MPH. This is with a stock engine with stock cylinder bores.
The EPA rating for a 1982 4.9L with auto tranny was an average of 18 MPG back in 1982.
It is quite possible to get the estimated EPA in your vehicle though with the right gearing and tires combination, and driving at 55 MPH. This is with a stock engine with stock cylinder bores.
The EPA rating for a 1982 4.9L with auto tranny was an average of 18 MPG back in 1982.
#12
Hmmmm, I got 10.7 MPG this last fill-up with the 1984 300 I6 with a 3-speed manual gearbox and a 2.47 axle. That was with a pint of seafoam in the tank, though, so hopefully that's what made it so bad.
I was figuring it probably got about 10 mpg when I bought it, but after finding out it had that low-ratio axle, I was hoping it would get better mpgs.......... :<
I was figuring it probably got about 10 mpg when I bought it, but after finding out it had that low-ratio axle, I was hoping it would get better mpgs.......... :<
#13
#14
#15
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern California
Posts: 8,786
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
17 Posts
Mine averages 21 MPG at 55 MPH. 300-6, T-18 4-speed, 2.75 gears with 225/75R15 tires. Completely stock except for one size larger tires.
If you haven't done so yet, I would read this thread here. It's got some great information that might help boost your mileage.
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...hing-else.html
If you haven't done so yet, I would read this thread here. It's got some great information that might help boost your mileage.
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...hing-else.html