1957 - 1960 F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Box Style Ford Trucks

59 F100 with a 79 Engine?

  #1  
Old 12-28-2011, 09:23 AM
leewiffen's Avatar
leewiffen
leewiffen is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
59 F100 with a 79 Engine?

I bought this 59 F100 pickup from Florida in June and was told it had a 351 engine fitted around 1985. When I got it here it would not run. It had a Rochester Quadrajet Carb fitted which was all gunged up so I fitted a new Holley 600cfm carb. It ran good, even though a friend of mine said it sounded as if it was missing, it started and ran down the road well.
I've used it a few times since with no problems, as long as I let it warm up, it would run and idle fine
Xmas day I got it out the garage and it would not run continuously...it would start, run for a while then die. I called the breakdown service out who said electonically it was fine, getting a spark, but the points / contact breakers were not great and suggested I fit an electronic ignition.
He fiddled with the points but said it seemed fuel related. I managed to limp it home but it ran really rough...I think he messed the timing up by adjusting the gap on the points
It came with two fuel pumps, and AC delco electronic pump pushing to the lift pump
Well up to now I've never checked the engine number but it starts D9AE...I cannot see the rest it is behind the starter motor. Well it seems this is either a marine engine ( possible with the Quadrajet carb ) or an emission era type 351M
I'm stumped...which engine do I have and which is the correct fuel delivery syste? why two pumps? Could this be a cause of it cutting out, not getting the correct fuel pressure......if so any suggestions?
Also I'd like to fit an electronic ignition, but which distributor do I have fitted and what would be a good system to improve what I have
As usual, budget is always an issue!!
leewiffen's photosets on Flickr
 
  #2  
Old 12-28-2011, 10:58 AM
1960fordf350's Avatar
1960fordf350
1960fordf350 is offline
More Turbo
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: parma
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Shouldn't need 2 fuel pumps for that truck. The manual pump on the engine should pull fuel just fine. Sounds like your tank is full of crap and is plugging up the system. I'd disconnect the line going to the manual pump on the engine and try the electric pump 1st to see if you have any fuel flow. If the the tank has a sock filter on the pickup, it could be plugged up too. Did you change the fuel filter? fuel, air, and fire make it run, if you have air and fire, only one thing left to check.
 
  #3  
Old 12-28-2011, 11:07 AM
leewiffen's Avatar
leewiffen
leewiffen is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fuel filter

When we fitted the new carburettor I fitted an inline fuel filter...would I still need to check for crap coming from the tank into the line or would this collect anything being pumped from the tank?
 
  #4  
Old 12-28-2011, 12:09 PM
85e150's Avatar
85e150
85e150 is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 31,837
Received 1,583 Likes on 1,291 Posts
The horizontal fuel pump mounting points to 351w. Are your valve covers trapazoid shaped and held by 6 bolts? ( /==\ is what the valve covers look like)
 
  #5  
Old 12-28-2011, 05:31 PM
spurredon's Avatar
spurredon
spurredon is offline
Fleet Owner

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 25,207
Received 584 Likes on 524 Posts
My first thought is that the mechanical pump failed and someone has just thrown an electric pump on it instead of fixing it correctly.


That is a nice looking truck you have there. Sure looks like a '60 to me though, and not a '59!


Post up some pics of your engine and folks will be able to give you more info.
 
  #6  
Old 12-29-2011, 06:37 AM
3414's Avatar
3414
3414 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: N E Ohio
Posts: 693
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Hard to really tell what engine from the limited areas shown on your pictures. My guess is a 351W. But what puzzles me is that if it is a 79 engine it should already have had the DuraSpark II electronic ignition. This is true for both 351W and 351M. Someone must have put on the old points style distributor at some time. If you want electronic ignition, the OEM setup on these engines is pretty good and very reliable. If you can find a distributor, coil, control box, and wiring from a similar engine at a junkyard that is a good start. If you want stronger spark, the DuraSpark II works well with the MSD 6A.
On the fuel system, look at the filter you installed, if it is clean you have no debris issues. You do not need both fuel pumps, I myself would stay with the mechanical pump, but whichever one you like, keep it and remove the other. If you stay with the electric, make sure it has a safety switch in the power circuit so it does not keep running when the engine stalls or otherwise stops running with the key on.
 
  #7  
Old 12-29-2011, 07:17 AM
leewiffen's Avatar
leewiffen
leewiffen is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
59 with a 79 engine

I've posted some more pictures on Flickr under F100 Fuel and ignition. I'm pretty sure it's a 351W but still not sure which distributor is has fitted

F100 fuel and ignition - a set on Flickr
 
  #8  
Old 12-29-2011, 07:49 AM
HOTWRENCH's Avatar
HOTWRENCH
HOTWRENCH is offline
Elder User

Join Date: May 2004
Location: saxton pa.
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Talking 351 W

It looks like you have a 351 Windsor, the distributor looks like a factory style points distributor.

Have A Great Day ----- Hotwrench
 
  #9  
Old 12-29-2011, 08:55 AM
leewiffen's Avatar
leewiffen
leewiffen is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
59 with a 79 engine

I've found this distributor...not a great quality photograph, but does this look the one?
distributor | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
 
  #10  
Old 12-30-2011, 08:27 PM
cparks's Avatar
cparks
cparks is offline
More Turbo
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Linden USA
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Yes that is a 351W Windsor engine. The mechanical pump on the motor should be good by itself. Maybe there was a problem with the pump, or the eccentric on the end of the cam which drives that pump.
 
  #11  
Old 12-31-2011, 04:31 AM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 88,826
Received 646 Likes on 541 Posts
Originally Posted by leewiffen
I've found this distributor...not a great quality photograph, but does this look the one?
distributor | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
Dizzy cap with male ends introduced in all FoMoCo vehicles in 1977. Besides the cap, there is a plastic adapter below that has the clips that retain the cap to the dizzy.

Whether this is a 351W dizzy or not...I cannot say. No Ford ever came with a red dizzy cap.
 
  #12  
Old 01-01-2012, 11:18 AM
leewiffen's Avatar
leewiffen
leewiffen is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
59 with a 79 engine

This distributor question is still playing on my mind.

I've been thinking I should upgrade to a newer distributor, even an HEI as shown in my flickr post.

Alternatively should I upgrade to a later Dizzy with the Pertronix electronic ignition installed
How about just sticking with teh existing points system, after all it worked really well until I started to get the fuel starvation problem.

These expensive HEI set ups seem more designed for performance than for my sedate type of driving here in the UK

I'm only driving around 2000 miles per year
 
  #13  
Old 01-02-2012, 01:37 AM
58 F 100's Avatar
58 F 100
58 F 100 is offline
New User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Laveen , AZ
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i have the hei in my truck and its much better
 
  #14  
Old 01-02-2012, 08:20 PM
FBNengr's Avatar
FBNengr
FBNengr is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Smile

Originally Posted by leewiffen
Alternatively should I upgrade to a later Dizzy with the Pertronix electronic ignition installed?
How about just sticking with the existing points system, after all it worked really well until I started to get the fuel starvation problem.

I'm only driving around 2000 miles per year
Nothing really wrong with points-type ignition, in my opinion. As long as you (or someone) knows how to set & adjust the points and timing, and keep the rest of the ignition system in good shape. And if you only drive 2000 miles a year, gosh I would think you could go at least 2 ~ 3 years easily, and maybe even more, between ignition tune-ups.

You wouldn't need a later distributor for a Pertronix unit. The Pertronix is just a simple swap-out for your existing points, condenser, and rotor. You still keep the same rotor cap. Super simple to do, it can take as little as a few minutes to do the swap. And the only giveaway that you've done something different, is that TWO wires that run to the coil, instead of just one!
Note: Also make sure your coil has the recommended resistance for the particular Pertronix unit - if not, or you can't verify, then you may wish to get a coil that does have the correct resistance.

For what it's worth, several months ago I swapped out my points and condensor for a Pertronix ignition,along with a coil. And although my truck was running pretty darned good before, I still noticed an improvement with the Pertronix - it starts faster, idles smoother, and purrs down the road like nobody's business.
 
  #15  
Old 01-11-2012, 02:27 PM
fast58's Avatar
fast58
fast58 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a '79 351 W in my '58 and I am using a Proform HEI one wire distributor. It is set up just like a GM distributor with the coil on top of the Distributor cap. It works great plus it's simple to install and relatively cheap. AND you can get it with a blue cap so it looks more Fordish.
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 59 F100 with a 79 Engine?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:38 AM.