Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > General > Ford vs The Competition
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


Ford vs The Competition Technical discussion and comparison ONLY. Trolls will not be tolerated.

Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 12-22-2011, 04:30 PM
mictro mictro is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 12
mictro is starting off with a positive reputation.
f150 vs gm

I have read alot of past posts but wanted to toss this out there again regarding fuel economy of a 2009 or 10 f150 ext cab 5.4 4x4 vs equiv in a gm with active fuel managment. Dont have the cash for newer eco or 5.0l
trucks and not going the lifted route with larger tires as well . Looking for hard honest real world stock fuel economy figures from those who have these trucks. Sorry for bringing it up again. Merry Christmas to all.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-22-2011, 04:44 PM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins tseekins is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hampton, Virginia
Posts: 19,280
tseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputation
There are too many things to consider before starting a war over MPG's.

1. Cab configuration
2. Gear ratio
3. driving habits

This will likely get kicked to "ford Vs the competition".
__________________
Tim
SCPO United States Coast Guard Retired
2011 F-150 XLT 4x4 Ecoboost
2010 Ford Focus
2004 Expedition XLT 4x2

FTE Guidelines
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-22-2011, 09:19 PM
efx4's Avatar
efx4 efx4 is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 982
efx4 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
2010 Super Crew 6.5' bed FX4 and 3.73 rear. Right now avg. 13.7 mpg mostly stop and go driving. During the warmer months avg. is around mid 14's. The lieometer (mpg read out) on the highway below 2000 rpm's is around 18, and between 8-9 towing my 6000 lbs. plus camper.
__________________
2013 Keystone Outback 33' Travel Trailer
2013 F-150 Max Tow Ecoboost Lariat
2014 Ford Fusion SE Ecoboost
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-22-2011, 10:15 PM
NoMo's Avatar
NoMo NoMo is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: OK
Posts: 4,742
NoMo is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I have a 2007 GMC extended cab 4x5 with 5.3L and 4-speed auto. My driving isn't typical as I do a bit more idling than most folks so my mileage figures aren't as good as they 'could' be. Not sure that the 6-speed tranny in the newer models helps as much with city driving, but they're coupled with lower (numerical) gears so they can do better on the highway. Still, cylinder deactivation isn't as great as the advertising makes it sound. Many of us have found that we can get a little better mileage if we leave the transmission in "two-haul" mode as that tends to keep the engine in 4-cyl mode longer.

As noted above, make sure you're comparing similar trucks when buying... especially in terms of gear ratio.
__________________
2012 Ford Fusion SE I4
2011 F150 XLT CC 4x4 w/3.5L V6
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-22-2011, 11:21 PM
BlueOvalFitter's Avatar
BlueOvalFitter BlueOvalFitter is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cajun Country
Posts: 1,973
BlueOvalFitter is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Thumbs up

If I were to buy a new truck tomorrow it would be a GMC. I have driven Ford trucks since I was in high school (class of 82). I just want a change and think the current GMCs look and drive better then the current Ford trucks,IMHO. I have had so many hot rods in my past,98% Chevy (built or rebuilt about 35 SBC engines),but have always driven Ford trucks.
__________________
2007XL R/Cab,4.2 V6,auto,cruise control
The anticipation of death is worse then death itself!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-23-2011, 06:54 AM
parkgt parkgt is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 24
parkgt is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueOvalFitter View Post
If I were to buy a new truck tomorrow it would be a GMC. I have driven Ford trucks since I was in high school (class of 82). I just want a change and think the current GMCs look and drive better then the current Ford trucks,IMHO. I have had so many hot rods in my past,98% Chevy (built or rebuilt about 35 SBC engines),but have always driven Ford trucks.

I did just the opposite I came out of a GMC, had both a 2000 and then a 2003 5.3 SLT Quadrasteer. Both very dependable, mpg in 16.4 range.

When I decided to buy new the interior of the Ford and the 5.0L won me over. A new GMC just would not have seemed like a new truck with the same basic interior and 5.3 engine.

Only 1700 miles on my 2011 Plat, but no regrets yet.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-23-2011, 08:07 AM
Going_Going_Gone Going_Going_Gone is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 319
Going_Going_Gone is starting off with a positive reputation.
For what it's worth, our 2010 Supercrew 4X4 with 5.4 and 3.55 axles has averaged 15.7 mpg (hand calculated) over 30K miles with minimal stop-and-go driving...exactly one mpg better than my son gets in his 2006 Supercrew 4X4 with 3.73 axles, bigger off-road tires, and much heavier foot. I hoped to get better, but realistically I'm getting about the same as my other son gets in his 2011 Ecoboost with identical build configuration and axle ratios.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-23-2011, 10:22 AM
shotgunz's Avatar
shotgunz shotgunz is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 2,016
shotgunz is a name known to allshotgunz is a name known to allshotgunz is a name known to allshotgunz is a name known to allshotgunz is a name known to allshotgunz is a name known to all
Boat Puller (Ford F-150) | Fuelly

S. Crew, 5.4L, 4x4, 157" WB, 3.73LS
__________________
Charlie
"Good judgement comes from experience. Experience comes from bad judgement." - Colin Powell to new batch of 2LTs (while serving as V Corps Commander)
Factory manuals here: http://www.motorcraftservice.com

My fuel mileage: http://www.fuelly.com/driver/shotgun/f150
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-23-2011, 01:23 PM
broncobran68's Avatar
broncobran68 broncobran68 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 490
broncobran68 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by shotgunz View Post
Boat Puller (Ford F-150) | Fuelly

S. Crew, 5.4L, 4x4, 157" WB, 3.73LS
I take it you never use your boat? Just kidding but that's really good mileage. I get between 5 and 9 mpg pulling my boat which gets the overall average down to around 12mpg in a hurry.

I wouldn't worry about the fuel economy between the two brands it'll be close enough not to be the deciding factor.
__________________

'09 F150 SCREW FX4. 2.5" AS Leveling kit/3" blocks. Line-x. 35" Toyo M/Ts on 18x9 Moto Metals. Homelink mod.
'68 BRONCO. 5.5" lift, 35s, 289 EFI, rollcage, durabak interior
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-23-2011, 02:50 PM
mictro mictro is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 12
mictro is starting off with a positive reputation.
Thanks to all that replied. Just trying to gather alittle more info before i switch. Im not 100 percent brand loyal, but ive had great service and luck with every ford we have owned. (dont want to jinx myself) I can deal with mpgs that are close and it appears that they should be, but didnt want to give up 2 plus mpg though. Does the 2009 up 5.4 have a six speed auto trans? That seems like it should help a bit in mixed driveing.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-23-2011, 04:23 PM
shotgunz's Avatar
shotgunz shotgunz is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 2,016
shotgunz is a name known to allshotgunz is a name known to allshotgunz is a name known to allshotgunz is a name known to allshotgunz is a name known to allshotgunz is a name known to all
You can only get the 6-speed auto with the 5.4L.
__________________
Charlie
"Good judgement comes from experience. Experience comes from bad judgement." - Colin Powell to new batch of 2LTs (while serving as V Corps Commander)
Factory manuals here: http://www.motorcraftservice.com

My fuel mileage: http://www.fuelly.com/driver/shotgun/f150
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-25-2011, 11:31 PM
dkf's Avatar
dkf dkf is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pa
Posts: 9,211
dkf is a splendid one to beholddkf is a splendid one to beholddkf is a splendid one to beholddkf is a splendid one to beholddkf is a splendid one to beholddkf is a splendid one to beholddkf is a splendid one to behold
Cylinder deactiviation (active fuel management) is more of a farse used to sell vehicles than anything. The added complexity far outweighs the negligeable gains in fuel economy IMO. On either truck the 6 speed trans will help with mpg.
__________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." (Thomas Jefferson)
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-26-2011, 11:37 AM
mictro mictro is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 12
mictro is starting off with a positive reputation.
Right, it is extreme to shut down half of the engine in order to make up for the lack of efficiency of an engine. I am leaning towards an 09 or 10 4.6l 6spd. Will only be towing utility trailer periodicly and not putting on oversize tires. Those that have these satisfied with the combination?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-27-2011, 03:50 AM
shotgunz's Avatar
shotgunz shotgunz is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 2,016
shotgunz is a name known to allshotgunz is a name known to allshotgunz is a name known to allshotgunz is a name known to allshotgunz is a name known to allshotgunz is a name known to all
If you're concered about mileage and won't be towing or hauling any heavy loads, get the 3.31 rear end.
__________________
Charlie
"Good judgement comes from experience. Experience comes from bad judgement." - Colin Powell to new batch of 2LTs (while serving as V Corps Commander)
Factory manuals here: http://www.motorcraftservice.com

My fuel mileage: http://www.fuelly.com/driver/shotgun/f150
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-27-2011, 05:19 AM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins tseekins is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hampton, Virginia
Posts: 19,280
tseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by shotgunz View Post
If you're concered about mileage and won't be towing or hauling any heavy loads, get the 3.31 rear end.

Or if it's a 4x2, the 3.15 is available and widely used.
__________________
Tim
SCPO United States Coast Guard Retired
2011 F-150 XLT 4x4 Ecoboost
2010 Ford Focus
2004 Expedition XLT 4x2

FTE Guidelines
Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2011, 05:19 AM
 
 
 
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > General > Ford vs The Competition

Tags
55, 65, active, bed, competitor, economy, f150, ford, fuel, general, gm, management, motors, powered, vbulletin

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup