When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
oh. No cat, but cant guarantee it left the factory like that. That is one of the first thing removed from most farm trucks (as this was) because it is a fire hazzard when parking or driving in dry fields.
anyway. they have both sizes in stock, just have to order the cables. Will deal with the shoes when I get them apart this weekend.
The emissions compliance sticker under the hood would tell you if it was NON-CATALYST.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/24183730@N03/2340584319/http://www.flickr.com/photos/24183730@N03/2340584319/ by http://www.flickr.com/people/24183730@N03/, on Flickr
If it's non catalyst then it's over 8500 gvw and takes the 3" brake shoes.
Don't bet on that Jim, mine is crew cab dually with 460 and C6. It came with 2 1/2" shoes and is the 7400 lb RGAW rating. I now have 3" shoes on the rear as that's what the 93? rear came with. BTW, mine is 10,000 GVW.
Mine states "This engine conforms to U.S. EPA regulations applicable to 1986 model year heavy-duty engines" It also says in big letters NON-CATALYST
Bill,
This is the 7400# truck? Or the 10k one?
One thing I notice is that my '87 sticker has all that non-conformance penalty legalese, that your '86 doesn't
The rear gross axle weight on the door sticker is 7400#, the gross vehicle weight rating is 10K. I suspect the legalese is due to being a 1987 model. Ford may not have had the EFI system for the 460 debugged completely in time for 1987 introduction, same for the 351 HO that year. Both applications seemed like overlaps. On the brakes, Ford may have just increased the shoe width for 87, although the 90 parts truck was an F250 with trailer tow and had 2 1/2" shoes. Maybe it's like Chrysler products, you need the old ones with you to match up?