EcoBoost (all engine sizes) 3.5L Twin Turbo EcoBoost V6, 2.7 Twin Turbo EcoBoost V6, 2.3l/2.0L I4 EcoBoost Engines

2.0L ecoboost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #31  
Old 11-20-2014, 01:20 PM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
tseekins is offline
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 38,156
Received 1,221 Likes on 803 Posts
Originally Posted by SHOpar
I have the 2.0 EcoBoost in my Stage 3 tuned 2013 Focus ST and love it. The motor is a beast stock, but throw on a larger intercooler, turbo-back exhaust, intake, and a tune, and it really screams.

I keep throwing around the idea of selling my 7.3 Powerstroke for a EcoBoost F150, but, with rumors of the Focus RS coming out next year with the 2.3 EcoBoost, I might be selling my ST much sooner than planned for the RS and holding on to the 7.3 to keep the car payments at a reasonable level.

It's hard not going out and jumping on a 2014 F150 Ecoboost right now though with the sales they are running. There's a Sterling Gray XLT 4x4 SCAB SB with MaxTow, offroad package, leather, and HIDs on one of the local lots advertised for 33K right now that is very tempting...
I'd hold out for a 2015 F-150, 700+ pounds lighter and the 3.5L EB will really come alive, as if it doesn't already.
 
  #32  
Old 11-23-2014, 06:17 PM
FalcoDog's Avatar
FalcoDog
FalcoDog is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Up State NY
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SHOpar
I have the 2.0 EcoBoost in my Stage 3 tuned 2013 Focus ST and love it. The motor is a beast stock, but throw on a larger intercooler, turbo-back exhaust, intake, and a tune, and it really screams.

I keep throwing around the idea of selling my 7.3 Powerstroke for a EcoBoost F150, but, with rumors of the Focus RS coming out next year with the 2.3 EcoBoost, I might be selling my ST much sooner than planned for the RS and holding on to the 7.3 to keep the car payments at a reasonable level.

It's hard not going out and jumping on a 2014 F150 Ecoboost right now though with the sales they are running. There's a Sterling Gray XLT 4x4 SCAB SB with MaxTow, offroad package, leather, and HIDs on one of the local lots advertised for 33K right now that is very tempting...
Oh Man! Buy it now! I think my Gray F150 and Silver ST look good together. You can always get the RS later........
 
  #33  
Old 11-24-2014, 12:56 AM
PartsPaul62's Avatar
PartsPaul62
PartsPaul62 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Shawnee, Kansas
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Turquia Loco
I have a 2013 Expy EB and love it. It is not a power wagon, but I love the 24 MPG city and 30 MPG back roads. I get 25-26 MPG on the interstate.
I'm right here with you. I have a 2013 Edge v2.0 and with only 8500 on the odo and I'm seeing the same numbers. I am hoping the numbers will come up with a few more miles. We bought this on a lease deal, but if it proves to be a good one I will roll the lease into a u/c loan after 3 years.
 
  #34  
Old 03-01-2015, 08:34 PM
FordBlueHeart's Avatar
FordBlueHeart
FordBlueHeart is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Mesick
Posts: 3,551
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
My wife and I leased a 2014 Titanium Escape 4x4 in October of 2013. She is the sole driver and NEVER gets better than 22mpg. Right now we are averaging less than 17mpg. Our 09 Edge was head and shoulders above the Escape. After reading these posts, I'm even more disgusted.
 
  #35  
Old 03-06-2015, 08:05 PM
mefast's Avatar
mefast
mefast is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Southwestern, Ontario
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Think the 2.0l would have enough grunt to haul my 1995 F150 around? Thinking of doing a engine swap using the Ford Racing control pack.
 
  #36  
Old 03-07-2015, 09:00 AM
fellro86's Avatar
fellro86
fellro86 is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Marengo, Iowa
Posts: 11,697
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I would think you would need to keep it wound up, which will make the fuel efficiency suffer, along with likely heating the transmission that was unlikely to be ever intended to handle that much weight. I would definitely defer to the tow ratings and make a judgement from there, as brakes are also another factor to consider.
 
  #37  
Old 03-08-2015, 06:33 AM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
tseekins is offline
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 38,156
Received 1,221 Likes on 803 Posts
The base curb weight of the Lincoln MKZ Ecoboost is 3687 lbs. My old 1988 f-150 4x4 with the V-8 and M5OD weighed about 3800 lbs.

This could actually be a sweet conversion as long as no towing or truck like work was intended as I echo the above comments from Fellro. You'll cook the transmission.
 
  #38  
Old 03-08-2015, 09:39 AM
j.grif's Avatar
j.grif
j.grif is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: plymouth mi
Posts: 730
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by mefast
Think the 2.0l would have enough grunt to haul my 1995 F150 around? Thinking of doing a engine swap using the Ford Racing control pack.
I would use the 2.3, at 300 hp, this engine is no slouch with a lot of torque as well. Also see project ugly horse....Project Ugly Horse News and Information - Autoblog I would use the 2.3 if for no other reason than aero drag that you get with a pickup truck that large is substantial, I think the extra torque would help. I do not think these engines will have to rev or use any more rpms than a period engine like the old 302 pushrod engine with their broad flat torque curves, definitely an interesting swap with loads of room to spare in the engine compartment!
 
  #39  
Old 03-08-2015, 01:40 PM
wbrook_ford's Avatar
wbrook_ford
wbrook_ford is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Burnett WI
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mefast
Think the 2.0l would have enough grunt to haul my 1995 F150 around? Thinking of doing a engine swap using the Ford Racing control pack.
http://www.focusst.org/forum/attachments/focus-st-performance/34411d1392437764-cobb-ap-v3-fswrks-tune-verses-ford-racing-pluses-minuses-2i3k.png.jpg

^Link to FRPP Controls Pack torque graph.

The way they built this motor, it makes awesome torque down low, almost too much to handle if not for traction control in some cases. The FRPP Controls Pack comes with revised tuning that gives even more low end torque (+90ft/lbs) and maintains the engine warranty. You can go nuts with aftermarket tuning and parts and get even more, if that's not enough.

I'd say with the 2.0EB being available and very compact, it would make a great swap into any truck needing more grunt. Concerned with fuel economy? It would be better than any v6 or v8 swap with comparable torque per dollar.
 

Last edited by wbrook_ford; 03-08-2015 at 01:41 PM. Reason: link
  #40  
Old 06-04-2015, 03:06 PM
mefast's Avatar
mefast
mefast is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Southwestern, Ontario
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the thoughts everyone! Sorry if I've changed the OP's idea for this thread.

Having done more research, I found a bell housing that will mount this engine to a Tremec Magnum 6-speed. I don't need to carry heavy loads in my old truck any more since my fiance has a 2014 FX4 F150 (with the 3.5L Ecoboost), so it would be my weekend errand runner or beach cruiser. If the mileage turned out to be decent (high 20 MPG would do), it might even make a good daily driver since current commute is about 140-160 kms (~85-100 mile) round trip. For good fuel economy, the key would to gear it so that it sits perfectly in the power band and try to drop as much weight from the truck as I can. I might even consider lowering the truck a little to help smooth out some of the aerodynamics.

The other engine option would be the 5.0L Coyote, but there's a part of me that wants to drive a 4 cylinder, turbo'd F150. I bet there's not many of those out there.

How's this engine been holding up for people? Any major concerns or warranty repairs? With an engine swap, I wouldn't be able to go to the dealer for a free fix.
 
  #41  
Old 06-04-2015, 04:00 PM
2ndStroke's Avatar
2ndStroke
2ndStroke is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 9,545
Received 42 Likes on 23 Posts
My 2.0t escape hasn't been back to the dealer since we bought it, about 2 years ago now. Zero issues with anything. Reminds me, was supposed to get a re flash for airbags or something, lol
 
  #42  
Old 06-15-2015, 03:02 PM
Scurv's Avatar
Scurv
Scurv is offline
Senior User
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Belleville
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My 2012 Edge Ecoboost TT has been back twice for an oil leak from what I believe is the intercooler air tube and intake housing? From the underside I can see a housing of some sort and four bolt thread ends. Each bolt end has dripping oil. Not happy at all with low speed shifting, highway noise from the rear wheels, gas mileage, and this oil leak. Heard Ford was getting rid of the 2.0. Read a post about nasty stuff getting sucked into the intake depositing water and crud. Something about a poorly designed crankcase and pcv system? I'm going to trade it in for a JKU.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sarge261
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel
8
07-17-2012 11:54 AM
94WhiteF250
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
3
11-13-2011 07:58 PM
pgjeepster
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel
7
02-18-2009 09:43 PM
triton185
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
12
05-01-2007 12:25 AM
Iron Jaw
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel
5
01-14-2004 07:52 AM



Quick Reply: 2.0L ecoboost



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:37 AM.