Mustang drivetrain into 62 Econoline pick up, need help - Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums



Mustang drivetrain into 62 Econoline pick up, need help

Reply
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 11-02-2011, 03:08 PM
62surftruck 62surftruck is offline
New User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 23
62surftruck is starting off with a positive reputation.
Mustang drivetrain into 62 Econoline pick up, need help

Gentlemen,
I have a 1962 Econoline 5 window pick up with a 170 and a 3 on the tree. I just purchased a complete drivetrain from a 1966 mustang, it has a 200 engine, c4 automatic.I want to put the entire mustang drivetrain into my truck. What do I need to do this and is the rear from the mustang compatible with the original from my truck. Any help from all you gurus will be greatly appreciated.
Thank you
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-10-2011, 07:29 PM
52 Merc's Avatar
52 Merc 52 Merc is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Kennewick, WA
Posts: 6,870
52 Merc has much to be proud of52 Merc has much to be proud of52 Merc has much to be proud of52 Merc has much to be proud of52 Merc has much to be proud of52 Merc has much to be proud of52 Merc has much to be proud of52 Merc has much to be proud of
The 170 and 200 6 cylinders should be completely interchangable as they are the same physical size. AFAIK, the auto trans was an option in the Econoline, so I would think there's room for the C4 in place of the original 3 speed. You might have to work on custom mounts, though.

For the rear end, I don't see what you'd gain by swapping that, unless your Econoline rear is junk and the Mustang isn't. They both use the same light duty 7 1/4" differential. You can measure the overall width and spring perch locations to see how they compare.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-10-2011, 09:29 PM
62surftruck 62surftruck is offline
New User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 23
62surftruck is starting off with a positive reputation.
Thanks Merc,
The 200 is being installed this week for now, I'm waiting on installing the trans and as for the rear my gears are 3.50, the mustangs is 2.83 I wanted better cruising speed at lower rpms, but the mustang rear is 50 1/2 inches and the econoline rear is 56 inches wide from inside drum to inside drum.
Thanks Again
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-09-2011, 03:16 PM
Ruffinit's Avatar
Ruffinit Ruffinit is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 150
Ruffinit is starting off with a positive reputation.
I don't recall exactly, but I believe you can just swap out the pumkins in the two rear ends.. I think they are the same, but of course you'll have to check that.

The biggest difference besides the obvious in the 170 and 200 are the hydraulic lifters in the 200.

How goes the swap? I have a '65 E100 Deluxe p'up with 170/3sp/3.50 and a '66 Falcon van with 240/3sp/8 in.
Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New from north of Atlanta fordsince1965 New Member Introductions 2 12-04-2016 01:53 PM
Edelbrock performer package willowbilly3 Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W) 1 04-20-2015 05:24 PM
Mustang II front end in my 1955 F100 Vin Man 1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks 11 05-28-2013 11:48 PM
28 Spline Yoke - Hickabilly1960 1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks 19 05-30-2010 12:09 PM
New guy on the forums ClifBrohn Big Block V8 - 385 Series (6.1/370, 7.0/429, 7.5/460) 11 09-10-2007 10:33 PM


Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums >

Tags
100, 1961, 1966, 62, 64, cylinder, econoline, end, ford, forums, link, pickup, pickups, rear, swap

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:34 PM.